Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Quasicrystal stability and nucleation kinetics from density functional theory

Abstract

The aperiodic order of quasicrystals bridges the amorphous and crystalline regime, so it has remained unclear whether quasicrystals are metastable or stable phases of matter. Density functional theory is often used to evaluate thermodynamic stability, but quasicrystals are long-range aperiodic and their energies cannot be calculated using conventional ab initio methods. Here, we perform first-principles calculations on quasicrystal nanoparticles of increasing size, from which we can directly extrapolate their bulk and surface energies. Using this technique, we determine with high confidence that the icosahedral quasicrystals ScZn7.33 and YbCd5.7 are ground-state phases, thus revealing that translational symmetry is not a necessary condition for the zero-temperature stability of inorganic solids. Although we found the ScZn7.33 quasicrystal to be thermodynamically stable, we show on a mixed thermodynamic and kinetic phase diagram that its solidification from the melt is limited by nucleation, which illustrates why even stable materials may be kinetically challenging to grow. Our techniques broadly open the door to first-principles investigations into the structure–bonding–stability relationships of aperiodic materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Bulk and surface energies of iQCs from scooped nanospheres.
Fig. 2: DFT-calculated convex hull stability of iQCs.
Fig. 3: Size-dependent stability of iQC-ScZn7.33.
Fig. 4: Mixed thermodynamic and kinetic phase diagrams of competitive nucleation in the Sc–Zn system.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw DFT-FE input and output files for the large nanoparticle clusters have been deposited on the NOMAD repository at https://nomad-lab.eu/prod/v1/gui/search/entries/entry/id/Iy5_-DeDSoejmoOw7kuJ0mGgfp_u. All other data mentioned in the text are available in the manuscript or in the Supplementary Information.

Code availability

The DFT-FE is open-source code available via https://sites.google.com/umich.edu/dftfe.

References

  1. Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. & Cahn, J. W. Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951–1953 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelton, K. F. Quasicrystals: structure and stability. Int. Mater. Rev. 38, 105–137 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steurer, W. Quasicrystals: what do we know? What do we want to know? What can we know? Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A: Found. Adv. 74, 1–11 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimasaki, T. et al. Anomalous localization in a kicked quasicrystal. Nat. Phys. 20, 409–414 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeon, S. Y., Kwon, H. & Hur, K. Intrinsic photonic wave localization in a three-dimensional icosahedral quasicrystal. Nat. Phys. 13, 363–368 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagai, Y. et al. High-Temperature atomic diffusion and specific heat in quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 196301 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghadimi, R., Sugimoto, T., Tanaka, K. & Tohyama, T. Topological superconductivity in quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 104, 144511 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Uri, A. et al. Superconductivity and strong interactions in a tunable moiré quasicrystal. Nature 620, 762–767 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Han, I. et al. Formation of a single quasicrystal upon collision of multiple grains. Nat. Commun. 12, 5790 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dyson, F. Birds and frogs. Not. AMS 56, 212–223 (2009).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Torquato, S., Zhang, G. & De Courcy-Ireland, M. Hidden multiscale order in the primes. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 135002 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Steurer, W. Twenty years of structure research on quasicrystals. Part I. Pentagonal, octagonal, decagonal, and dodecagonal quasicrystals. Z. Krist. Cryst. Mater. 219, 391–446 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mukhopadhyay, N. K. & Yadav, T. P. Quasicrystals: a new class of structurally complex intermetallics. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 102, 59–90 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun, W. et al. The thermodynamic scale of inorganic crystalline metastability. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600225 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalugin, P. Growth of entropy stabilized quasicrystals. Eur. Phys. J. B 18, 77–84 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Je, K., Lee, S., Teich, E. G., Engel, M. & Glotzer, S. C. Entropic formation of a thermodynamically stable colloidal quasicrystal with negligible phason strain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2011799118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Widom, M. & Mihalkovič, M. Quasicrystal structure prediction: a review. Isr. J. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.202300122 (2023).

  18. Fayen, E., Filion, L., Foffi, G. & Smallenburg, F. Quasicrystal of binary hard spheres on a plane stabilized by configurational entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 48202 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai, A. P., Guo, J. Q., Abe, E., Takakura, H. & Sato, T. J. A stable binary quasicrystal. Nature 408, 537–538 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Canfield, P. C. et al. Solution growth of a binary icosahedral quasicrystal of Sc12Zn88. Phys. Rev. B 81, 020201 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Henley, C. L., De Boissieu, M. & Steurer, W. Discussion on clusters, phasons and quasicrystal stabilisation. Philos. Mag. 86, 1131–1151 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai, A. P. Icosahedral clusters, icosaheral order and stability of quasicrystals—a view of metallurgy. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 9, 013008 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai, A. P. A test of Hume-Rothery rules for stable quasicrystals. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 334, 317–322 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsai, A. P. Discovery of stable icosahedral quasicrystals: progress in understanding structure and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 5352–5365 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai, A. P., Inoue, A., Bizen, Y. & Masumoto, T. Kinetics of the amorphous to icosahedral structure transition in Al-Cu-V and Al-Mn-Si alloys. Acta Metall. 37, 1443–1449 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Okumura, H., Tsai, A. P., Inoue, A. & Masumoto, T. The observation of mechanical relaxation in a quasicrystalline Al75Cu15V10 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 181, 781–784 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weisbecker, P., Bonhomme, G., Bott, G. & Dubois, J. M. The oxidation at 500 °C of AlCuFe quasicrystalline powders: a X-ray diffraction study. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351, 1630–1638 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hennig, R. G., Carlsson, A. E., Kelton, K. F. & Henley, C. L. Ab initio Ti-Zr-Ni phase diagram predicts stability of icosahedral TiZrNi quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 71, 144103 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Berns, V. M. & Fredrickson, D. C. Problem solving with pentagons: Tsai-type quasicrystal as a structural response to chemical pressure. Inorg. Chem. 52, 12875–12877 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Henley, C. L., Mihalkovič, M. & Widom, M. Total-energy-based structure prediction for d(AlNiCo). J. Alloys Compd. 342, 221–227 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Engel, M., Damasceno, P. F., Phillips, C. L. & Glotzer, S. C. Computational self-assembly of a one-component icosahedral quasicrystal. Nat. Mater. 14, 109–116 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mihalkovič, M. & Widom, M. Spontaneous formation of thermodynamically stable Al-Cu-Fe icosahedral quasicrystal from realistic atomistic simulations. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013196 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Han, I. et al. Dynamic observation of dendritic quasicrystal growth upon laser-induced solid-state transformation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 195503 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kurtuldu, G. & Bernet, M. The relation between the glass forming ability and nucleation kinetics of metastable quasicrystals in Mg–Zn–Yb liquid. J. Alloys Compd. 945, 168930 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fiorentini, V. & Methfessel, M. Extracting convergent surface energies from slab calculations. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 6525 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gavini, V., Knap, J., Bhattacharya, K. & Ortiz, M. Non-periodic finite-element formulation of orbital-free density functional theory. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 669–696 (2007).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Dreyer, C. E., Janotti, A. & Van De Walle, C. G. Absolute surface energies of polar and nonpolar planes of GaN. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 89, 081305 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Navrotsky, A. Nanoscale effects on thermodynamics and phase equilibria in oxide systems. ChemPhysChem 12, 2207–2215 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Navrotsky, A. Energetics at the nanoscale: impacts for geochemistry, the environment, and materials. MRS Bull. 41, 139–145 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Takakura, H., Gómez, C. P., Yamamoto, A., De Boissieu, M. & Tsai, A. P. Atomic structure of the binary icosahedral Yb–Cd quasicrystal. Nat. Mater. 6, 58–63 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yamada, T. et al. Atomic structure and phason modes of the Sc–Zn icosahedral quasicrystal. IUCrJ 3, 247–258 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Motamarri, P. et al. DFT-FE–A massively parallel adaptive finite-element code for large-scale density functional theory calculations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 246, 106853 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Das, S., Motamarri, P., Subramanian, V., Rogers, D. M. & Gavini, V. DFT-FE 1.0: a massively parallel hybrid CPU-GPU density functional theory code using finite-element discretization. Comput. Phys. Commun. 280, 108473 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Motamarri, P. & Gavini, V. Configurational forces in electronic structure calculations using Kohn-Sham density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 97, 165132 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Motamarri, P., Nowak, M. R., Leiter, K., Knap, J. & Gavini, V. Higher-order adaptive finite-element methods for Kohn–Sham density functional theory. J. Comput. Phys. 253, 308–343 (2013).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou, Y., Saad, Y., Tiago, M. L. & Chelikowsky, J. R. Self-consistent-field calculations using Chebyshev-filtered subspace iteration. J. Comput. Phys. 219, 172–184 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Das, S. et al. Fast, scalable, and accurate finite-element based ab initio calculations using mixed precision computing: 46 PFLOPS simulation of a metallic dislocation system. In Proc. International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis 1–11 (ACM, 2019).

  48. Hamann, D. R. Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 88, 085117 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Prandini, G., Marrazzo, A., Castelli, I. E., Mounet, N. & Marzari, N. Precision and efficiency in solid-state pseudopotential calculations. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 72 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Das, S. et al. Large-scale materials modeling at quantum accuracy: ab initio simulations of quasicrystals and interacting extended defects in metallic alloys. In Proc. International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis 1–12 (ACM, 2023).

  51. Service, R. F. Exascale computers show off emerging science. Science 382, 864–865 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Curtarolo, S., Morgan, D. & Ceder, G. Accuracy of ab initio methods in predicting the crystal structures of metals: a review of 80 binary alloys. Calphad 29, 163–211 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Brown, I. D. Chemical and steric constraints in inorganic solids. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 48, 553–572 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lalvani, H. Non-periodic space structures. Int. J. Space Struct. 2, 93–108 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Palenzona, A. & Manfrinetti, P. The phase diagram of the Sc-Zn system. J. Alloys Compd. 247, 195–197 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sun, W., Jayaraman, S., Chen, W., Persson, K. A. & Ceder, G. Nucleation of metastable aragonite CaCO3 in seawater. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3199–3204 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sun, W. & Ceder, G. Efficient creation and convergence of surface slabs. Surf. Sci. 617, 53–59 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sun, W., Kitchaev, D. A., Kramer, D. & Ceder, G. Non-equilibrium crystallization pathways of manganese oxides in aqueous solution. Nat. Commun. 10, 573 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Balluffi, R. W., Allen, S. M. & Carter, W. C. Kinetics of Materials (Wiley, 2005).

  60. Bocklund, B. et al. ESPEI for efficient thermodynamic database development, modification, and uncertainty quantification: Application to Cu-Mg. MRS Commun. 9, 618–627 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Tang, C. et al. Thermodynamic modeling of the Sc-Zn system coupled with first-principles calculation. J. Min. Metall. Sect. B: Metall. 48, 123–130 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Palenzona, A. The ytterbium-cadmium system. J. Less Common Met. 25, 367–372 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Togo, A., Chaput, L., Tadano, T. & Tanaka, I. Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35, 353001 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Carreras, A., Togo, A. & Tanaka, I. DynaPhoPy: a code for extracting phonon quasiparticles from molecular dynamics simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 221, 221–234 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Puchala, B. et al. CASM — a software package for first-principles based study of multicomponent crystalline solids. Comput. Mater. Sci. 217, 111897 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Edagawa, K., Kajiyama, K., Tamura, R. & Takeuchi, S. High-temperature specific heat of quasicrystals and a crystal approximant. Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 312, 293–298 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Maintz, S., Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. LOBSTER: a tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based DFT. J. Comput. Chem. 37, 1030–1035 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Fredrickson, D. C. DFT-chemical pressure analysis: visualizing the role of atomic size in shaping the structures of inorganic materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5991–5999 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Fredrickson, R. T. & Fredrickson, D. C. Chemical pressure-derived assembly principles for dodecagonal quasicrystal approximants and other complex Frank-Kasper phases. Inorg. Chem. 61, 17682–17691 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Jiang, K. & Zhang, P. Numerical methods for quasicrystals. J. Comput. Phys. 256, 428–440 (2014).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. Yin, J., Jiang, K., Shi, A. C., Zhang, P. & Zhang, L. Transition pathways connecting crystals and quasicrystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106230118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Miao, J., Ercius, P. & Billinge, S. J. L. Atomic electron tomography: 3D structures without crystals. Science 353, aaf2157 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Fredrickson, D. C., Lee, S. & Hoffmann, R. Interpenetrating polar and nonpolar sublattices in intermetallics: the NaCd2 structure. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 1958–1976 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Dijkstra, M. & Luijten, E. From predictive modelling to machine learning and reverse engineering of colloidal self-assembly. Nat. Mater. 20, 762–773 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhou, W. et al. Colloidal quasicrystals engineered with DNA. Nat. Mater. 23, 424–428 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. Liu, X.-Y. et al. Self-assembled soft alloy with Frank–Kasper phases beyond metals. Nat. Mater. 23, 570–576 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. Zuo, Y. et al. Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 731–745 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. Schlipf, M. & Gygi, F. Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 36–44 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. Jain, A. et al. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50, 2295–2310 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tran, R. et al. Surface energies of elemental crystals. Sci. Data 3, 160080 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Dinsdale, A. T. SGTE data for pure elements. Calphad 15, 317–425 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Redlich, O. & Kister, A. T. Algebraic representation of thermodynamic properties and the classification of solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. 40, 345–348 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Eslami, H., Muggianu, Y. M., Gambino, M. & Bros, J. P. Enthalpies de formation des alliages liquides aluminium-germanium, gallium-germanium et aluminium-gallium-germanium entre 713 et 1230 K. J. Less Common Met. 64, 31–44 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Gelman, A. et al. Bayesian Data Analysis (CRC, 2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

W.B. acknowledges H. Takakura and T. Yamada for providing atomistic structures of ScZn7.33 and YbCd5.7 quasicrystals. The work by W.B., S.T. and W.S. was supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (Award No. DE-SC0021130). V.G. and S.D. give thanks for the support of the DOE, Basic Energy Sciences (Grant No. DE-SC0008637), which supported the development of DFT-FE. We acknowledge the Texas Advanced Computing Center at the University of Texas at Austin, which uses Grant Award TG-MAT210016 from the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment and Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support, National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the DOE (Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 using Award No. BES-ERCAP0020148), and the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the DOE (Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725), for providing high-performance computing resources that have contributed to the research results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: W.B. and W.S. Methodology: W.B., S.D., S.T., V.G. and W.S. Investigation: W.B., S.D. and S.T. Visualization: W.B. and S.T. Funding acquisition: W.S. and V.G. Supervision: W.S. Writing—original draft: W.B., S.T. and W.S. Writing—review and editing: W.B., S.D., S.T., V.G. and W.S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenhao Sun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks Peter Brommer, Marek Mihalkovic and An-chang Shi for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary sections 1–12, Figs. 1–19 and Tables 1–6.

Supplementary Data (download ZIP )

Supplementary Data 1 Raw and relaxed crystal structure data and scooped nanospheres of Sc–Zn and Yb–Cd crystalline phases. Supplementary Data 2 Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotential files used in this study for DFT simulation. Supplementary Data 3 Raw and relaxed atomic coordination data of scooped ScZn7.33 and YbCd5.7 nanospheres. Supplementary Data 4 Refined structure data of ScZn7.33 and YbCd5.7.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baek, W., Das, S., Tan, S. et al. Quasicrystal stability and nucleation kinetics from density functional theory. Nat. Phys. 21, 980–987 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02925-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02925-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing