Abstract
Driven systems are of fundamental scientific interest, as they can exhibit properties distinct from the same system at equilibrium. In certain cases, long-lived states of driven matter can emerge with new material properties. Here we probe the excitation spectrum of an emergent patterned state in a driven superfluid and find that its response is identical to that of a one-dimensional supersolid. By preparing wave packets as well as specific collective modes and probing their dynamics, we identify two distinct sound modes associated with spontaneously broken U(1) and translational symmetries. Consistent with the hydrodynamic description of superfluid smectics, longitudinal excitations propagate with finite velocities, whereas transverse perturbations exhibit diffusive behaviour. These results demonstrate how the conceptual framework of supersolidity can be used to characterize dynamic and far-from-equilibrium states.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed for this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The conclusions of this study do not depend on code or algorithms beyond standard numerical evaluations.
References
Fava, S. et al. Magnetic field expulsion in optically driven YBa2Cu3O6.48. Nature 632, 75 (2024).
Li, N. et al. Colloquium: phononics: manipulating heat flow with electronic analogs and beyond. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1045 (2012).
Wigner, E. P. in Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses (ed. Mehra, J.) 534–549 (Springer, 1995).
Goldman, N. & Dalibard, J. Periodically driven quantum systems: effective Hamiltonians and engineered gauge fields. Phys. Rev. X 4, 031027 (2014).
Oka, T. & Kitamura, S. Floquet engineering of quantum materials. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 387 (2019).
Kongkhambut, P. et al. Observation of a continuous time crystal. Science 377, 670 (2022).
Dogra, L. H. et al. Universal equation of state for wave turbulence in a quantum gas. Nature 620, 521 (2023).
Engels, P., Atherton, C. & Hoefer, M. A. Observation of Faraday waves in a Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 095301 (2007).
Smits, J., Liao, L., Stoof, H. T. C. & van der Straten, P. Observation of a space-time crystal in a superfluid quantum gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 185301 (2018).
Nguyen, J. H. V. et al. Parametric excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate: from Faraday waves to granulation. Phys. Rev. X 9, 011052 (2019).
Zhang, Z., Yao, K. X., Feng, L., Hu, J. & Chin, C. Pattern formation in a driven Bose-Einstein condensate. Nat. Phys. 16, 652 (2020).
Dupont, N. et al. Emergence of tunable periodic density correlations in a Floquet-Bloch system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2300980120 (2023).
Gross, E. P. Unified theory of interacting bosons. Phys. Rev. 106, 161 (1957).
Andreev, A. F. & Lifshitz, I. M. Quantum theory of defects in crystals. Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 1107 (1969).
Léonard, J., Morales, A., Zupancic, P., Esslinger, T. & Donner, T. Supersolid formation in a quantum gas breaking a continuous translational symmetry. Nature 543, 87 (2017).
Li, J.-R. et al. A stripe phase with supersolid properties in spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates. Nature 543, 91 (2017).
Recati, A. & Stringari, S. Supersolidity in ultracold dipolar gases. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 735 (2023).
Poli, E. et al. Glitches in rotating supersolids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 223401 (2023).
Xiang, J. et al. Giant magnetocaloric effect in spin supersolid candidate Na2BaCo(PO4)2. Nature 625, 270 (2024).
Tanzi, L. et al. Observation of a dipolar quantum gas with metastable supersolid properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130405 (2019).
Chomaz, L. et al. Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021012 (2019).
Böttcher, F. et al. Transient supersolid properties in an array of dipolar quantum droplets. Phys. Rev. X 9, 011051 (2019).
Norcia, M. A. et al. Two-dimensional supersolidity in a dipolar quantum gas. Nature 596, 357 (2021).
Guo, M. et al. The low-energy Goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar supersolid. Nature 574, 386 (2019).
Ilzhöfer, P. et al. Phase coherence in out-of-equilibrium supersolid states of ultracold dipolar atoms. Nat. Phys. 17, 356 (2021).
Tanzi, L. et al. Evidence of superfluidity in a dipolar supersolid from nonclassical rotational inertia. Science 371, 1162 (2021).
Norcia, M. A. et al. Can angular oscillations probe superfluidity in dipolar supersolids? Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 040403 (2022).
Biagioni, G. et al. Measurement of the superfluid fraction of a supersolid by Josephson effect. Nature 629, 773 (2024).
Casotti, E. et al. Observation of vortices in a dipolar supersolid. Nature 635, 327 (2024).
Hofmann, J. & Zwerger, W. Hydrodynamics of a superfluid smectic. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2021, 033104 (2021).
Blakie, P. B., Chomaz, L., Baillie, D. & Ferlaino, F. Compressibility and speeds of sound across the superfluid-to-supersolid phase transition of an elongated dipolar gas. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033161 (2023).
Šindik, M., Zawiślak, T., Recati, A. & Stringari, S. Sound, superfluidity, and layer compressibility in a ring dipolar supersolid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 146001 (2024).
Natale, G. et al. Excitation spectrum of a trapped dipolar supersolid and its experimental evidence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050402 (2019).
Tanzi, L. et al. Supersolid symmetry breaking from compressional oscillations in a dipolar quantum gas. Nature 574, 382 (2019).
Chisholm, C. S. et al. Probing supersolidity through excitations in a spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2412.13861 (2024).
Yoo, C.-D. & Dorsey, A. T. Hydrodynamic theory of supersolids: variational principle, effective Lagrangian, and density-density correlation function. Phys. Rev. B 81, 134518 (2010).
Liebster, N. et al. Observation of pattern stabilization in a driven superfluid. Phys. Rev. X 15, 011026 (2025).
Staliunas, K., Longhi, S. & de Valcárcel, G. J. Faraday patterns in Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 210406 (2002).
Kagan, Y. & Manakova, L. A. Formation of a condensed state with a macroscopic number of phonons in ultracold Bose gases. Phys. Rev. A 76, 023601 (2007).
Fujii, K. et al. Stable-fixed-point description of square-pattern formation in driven two-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A 109, L051301 (2024).
Etrych, J. et al. Pinpointing Feshbach resonances and testing Efimov universalities in 39K. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013174 (2023).
Hans, M. et al. High signal to noise absorption imaging of alkali atoms at moderate magnetic fields. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 023203 (2021).
Hertkorn, J. et al. Decoupled sound and amplitude modes in trapped dipolar supersolids. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042056 (2024).
Martin, P. C., Parodi, O. & Pershan, P. S. Unified hydrodynamic theory for crystals, liquid crystals, and normal fluids. Phys. Rev. A 6, 2401 (1972).
Leggett, A. J. Can a solid be ‘superfluid’? Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1543 (1970).
Chauveau, G. et al. Superfluid fraction in an interacting spatially modulated Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 226003 (2023).
Tao, J., Zhao, M. & Spielman, I. B. Observation of anisotropic superfluid density in an artificial crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 163401 (2023).
Fruchart, M., Hanai, R., Littlewood, P. B. & Vitelli, V. Non-reciprocal phase transitions. Nature 592, 363 (2021).
Sánchez-Baena, J., Politi, C., Maucher, F., Ferlaino, F. & Pohl, T. Heating a dipolar quantum fluid into a solid. Nat. Commun. 14, 1868 (2023).
Viermann, C. et al. Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime. Nature 611, 260 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We thank W. Zwerger for insightful comments on the hydrodynamic description. We also thank S. Stringari, A. Recati, B. Blakie, A. Smerzi, L. Pezzè and R. Klemt for positive and enlightening feedback as well as N. Antolini, N. Rasch, K. Fujii and T. Enss for discussions. This work is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (EXC 2181/1 – 390900948, the Heidelberg STRUCTURES Excellence Cluster) under SFB 1225 ISOQUANT – 273811115 and by the QuantERA II Programme, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 101017733) and from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project No. 499183856). N.L. acknowledges support from the Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors conceived and designed the experiments, analysed the data and contributed to the writing of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Physics thanks Carlo Gabbanini and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 System Preparation.
a) The experimental sequence. The oscillating line represents the scattering length. We start with a homogeneous system, and then flash on a light shift potential to imprint the lattice. A brief hold time sets the correct phase of the lattice amplitude R relative to the driving. After half a period, if superfluid phase modes are investigated, the second light shift is flashed on. Initial lattice phase deformations for excitation of the corresponding modes are included in the lattice imprint. b) The potentials used for the trap (left) and the light shift for the lattice (right). c) Mean densities throughout the drive. The contrast of the lattice oscillates, as described in eq. (20). The curves are horizontal cuts, averaged over a region of 16 μm in the center of the cloud.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Extraction of speeds of sound for superfluid and phase wavepackets.
Integrated density differences for superfluid and lattice phase defects are shown for the four times used to fit the speeds. The markers show the extracted position, enabling a comparison to the fit. Lab time of each density difference curve are shown in milliseconds.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Two-dimensional lattice deformation fields.
a) Longitudinal lattice mode. The positions of lattice maxima and minima are extracted from a reference (grey) and a perturbed lattice (red). The arrows indicate direction and magnitude of the displacement and are scaled by a factor of 10. For each time, the one-dimensional correlation with the initial state is computed, and depicted in fig. 3. b) Collective oscillation extracted in the same way for a transverse lattice mode.
Extended Data Fig. 4 System Characteristics.
a) The number of atoms varies less than 5% throughout dynamics. b) Energy in system as a function of time, extracted using the measured momentum space distribution n(k), and integrating ∫dk n(k)k2. The square at t = 0 is the value without an imprint and driving, and circles are after the imprint, measured stroboscopically at the point when the kinetic energy is maximal. c) Contrast of the stripe in x in the central region of the cloud, \(C=n{(x)}_{\max }-n{(x)}_{\min }/n{(x)}_{\max }+n{(x)}_{\min }\), extracted using a sine-fit to mean density distributions of the unperturbed system. d) Wavenumber of the lattice in x, extracted using a Fourier transform of mean density distributions. Standard errors and 1σ fit errors are either shown as the value ± its error or covered by the markers. The data in a, c, and d are derived from data sets of approximately 40 single realizations, while b uses approximately 30 single realizations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liebster, N., Sparn, M., Kath, E. et al. Supersolid-like sound modes in a driven quantum gas. Nat. Phys. 21, 1064–1070 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02927-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02927-4
This article is cited by
-
Refrigeration down to 0.16 K using a frustrated magnet Gd2B2MoO9
Nature Communications (2026)
-
Driven quantum fluids sound like supersolids
Nature Physics (2025)


