Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Bloch oscillations of a soliton in a one-dimensional quantum fluid

Abstract

The motion of a quantum system under an external force often challenges classical intuition. A notable example is the dynamics of a single particle in a periodic potential, which undergoes Bloch oscillations under the action of a constant force. Similar oscillations can also occur in one-dimensional quantum fluids without a lattice. The generalization of Bloch oscillations to a weakly bounded ensemble of interacting particles has so far been limited to the experimental study of the two-particle case, where the observed period is halved compared to the single-particle case. In this work, we observe the oscillations of the position of a mesoscopic solitonic wave packet—consisting of approximately 1,000 atoms—in a one-dimensional Bose gas subjected to a constant uniform force and in the absence of a lattice potential. The oscillation period scales inversely with the number of atoms, revealing its collective nature. We demonstrate the role of the phase coherence of the quantum bath in which the wave packet moves and investigate the underlying topology of the associated superfluid currents. Our measurements highlight the periodicity of the dispersion relation of collective excitations in one-dimensional quantum systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Soliton preparation and BOs in a tube.
Fig. 2: Principle of the experiment.
Fig. 3: Evolution of the phase of the bath component during BOs.
Fig. 4: Oscillation of one and two solitons under a constant force in a ring geometry.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The experimental data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes used for the analysis are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bloch, F. Über die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern. Z. Phys. 52, 555–600 (1929).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zener, C. A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 145, 523–529 (1934).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldmann, J. et al. Optical investigation of Bloch oscillations in a semiconductor superlattice. Phys. Rev. B 46, 7252 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben Dahan, M., Peik, E., Reichel, J., Castin, Y. & Salomon, C. Bloch oscillations of atoms in an optical potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4508 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilkinson, S., Bharucha, C., Madison, K., Niu, Q. & Raizen, M. Observation of atomic Wannier-Stark ladders in an accelerating optical potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4512 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geiger, Z. et al. Observation and uses of position-space Bloch oscillations in an ultracold gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 213201 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrari, G., Poli, N., Sorrentino, F. & Tino, G. Long-lived Bloch oscillations with bosonic Sr atoms and application to gravity measurement at the micrometer scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 060402 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, V. et al. Probing gravity by holding atoms for 20 seconds. Science 366, 745–749 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker, R., Yu, C., Zhong, W., Estey, B. & Müller, H. Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model. Science 360, 191–195 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Morel, L., Yao, Z., Cladé, P. & Guellati-Khélifa, S. Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion. Nature 588, 61–65 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Price, H. & Cooper, N. Mapping the Berry curvature from semiclassical dynamics in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 85, 033620 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aidelsburger, M. et al. Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms. Nat. Phys. 11, 162–166 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pertsch, T., Dannberg, P., Elflein, W., Bräuer, A. & Lederer, F. Optical Bloch oscillations in temperature tuned waveguide arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4752 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morandotti, R., Peschel, U., Aitchison, J. S., Eisenberg, H. & Silberberg, Y. Experimental observation of linear and nonlinear optical Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4756 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchis-Alepuz, H., Kosevich, Y. & Sánchez-Dehesa, J. Acoustic analogue of electronic Bloch oscillations and resonant Zener tunneling in ultrasonic superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 134301 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Block, A. et al. Bloch oscillations in plasmonic waveguide arrays. Nat. Commun. 5, 3843 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Morsch, O., Müller, J. H., Cristiani, M., Ciampini, D. & Arimondo, E. Bloch oscillations and mean-field effects of Bose-Einstein condensates in 1D optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 140402 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gustavsson, M. et al. Control of interaction-induced dephasing of Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 080404 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eckstein, M. & Werner, P. Damping of Bloch oscillations in the Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 186406 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Meinert, F. et al. Interaction-induced quantum phase revivals and evidence for the transition to the quantum chaotic regime in 1D atomic Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 193003 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Preiss, P. et al. Strongly correlated quantum walks in optical lattices. Science 347, 1229–1233 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Corrielli, G., Crespi, A., Della Valle, G., Longhi, S. & Osellame, R. Fractional Bloch oscillations in photonic lattices. Nat. Commun. 4, 1555 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, W. et al. Observation of Bloch oscillations dominated by effective anyonic particle statistics. Nat. Commun. 13, 2392 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bloch, F. Superfluidity in a ring. Phys. Rev. A 7, 2187 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Haldane, F. Effective harmonic-fluid approach to low-energy properties of one-dimensional quantum fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1840 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gangardt, D. & Kamenev, A. Bloch oscillations in a one-dimensional spinor gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 070402 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schecter, M., Gangardt, D. & Kamenev, A. Dynamics and Bloch oscillations of mobile impurities in one-dimensional quantum liquids. Ann. Phys. 327, 639–670 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pitaevskii, L. On the momentum of solitons and vortex rings in a superfluid. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 119, 1097 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Grusdt, F., Shashi, A., Abanin, D. & Demler, E. Bloch oscillations of bosonic lattice polarons. Phys. Rev. A 90, 063610 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Will, M. & Fleischhauer, M. Dynamics of polaron formation in 1D Bose gases in the strong-coupling regime. New J. Phys. 25, 083043 (2023).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Schecter, M., Gangardt, D. & Kamenev, A. Quantum impurities: from mobile Josephson junctions to depletons. New J. Phys. 18, 065002 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Petković, A. & Ristivojevic, Z. Dynamics of a mobile impurity in a one-dimensional Bose liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 105301 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Meinert, F. et al. Bloch oscillations in the absence of a lattice. Science 356, 945–948 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao, L.-C. et al. Spin soliton with a negative-positive mass transition. Phys. Rev. A 101, 043621 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Yu, X. & Blakie, P. Propagating ferrodark solitons in a superfluid: exact solutions and anomalous dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 125301 (2022).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Bresolin, S., Roy, A., Ferrari, G., Recati, A. & Pavloff, N. Oscillating solitons and ac Josephson effect in ferromagnetic Bose-Bose mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 220403 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Meng, L.-Z., Luo, X.-W. & Zhao, L.-C. Self-adapted Josephson oscillation of dark-bright solitons under constant forces. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15841 (2025).

  38. Kosevich, A., Ivanov, B. & Kovalev, A. Magnetic solitons. Phys. Rep. 194, 117 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Qu, C., Pitaevskii, L. & Stringari, S. Magnetic solitons in a binary Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 160402 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Congy, T., Kamchatnov, A. & Pavloff, N. Dispersive hydrodynamics of nonlinear polarization waves in two-component Bose–Einstein condensates. SciPost Phys. 1, 006 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chai, X. et al. Magnetic solitons in a spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030402 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Farolfi, A., Trypogeorgos, D., Mordini, C., Lamporesi, G. & Ferrari, G. Observation of magnetic solitons in two-component Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030401 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Chai, X., You, L. & Raman, C. Magnetic solitons in an immiscible two-component Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. A 105, 013313 (2022).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Zou, Y.-Q. et al. Optical control of the density and spin spatial profiles of a planar Bose gas. J. Phys. B 54, 08LT01 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kosevich, A. Bloch oscillations of magnetic solitons as an example of dynamical localization of quasiparticles in a uniform external field. Low Temp. Phys. 27, 513–541 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pitaevskii, L. & Stringari, S. Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).

  47. Isoshima, T., Nakahara, M., Ohmi, T. & Machida, K. Creation of a persistent current and vortex in a Bose-Einstein condensate of alkali-metal atoms. Phys. Rev. A 61, 063610 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Leanhardt, A. et al. Imprinting vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate using topological phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 190403 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wright, K., Blakestad, R., Lobb, C., Phillips, W. & Campbell, G. Driving phase slips in a superfluid atom circuit with a rotating weak link. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 025302 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Corman, L. et al. Quench-induced supercurrents in an annular Bose gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 135302 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Eckel, S., Jendrzejewski, F., Kumar, A., Lobb, C. & Campbell, G. Interferometric measurement of the current-phase relationship of a superfluid weak link. Phys. Rev. X 4, 031052 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hamner, C., Chang, J., Engels, P. & Hoefer, M. Generation of dark-bright soliton trains in superfluid-superfluid counterflow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 065302 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yan, D. et al. Multiple dark-bright solitons in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A 84, 053630 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kuramoto, Y. & Battogtokh, D. Coexistence of coherence and incoherence in nonlocally coupled phase oscillators. Nonlinear Phenom. Complex Syst. 5, 380–385 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Amico, L. et al. Colloquium: atomtronic circuits: from many-body physics to quantum technologies. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 041001 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Li, X.-L., Gong, M., Wang, Y.-H. & Zhao, L.-C. Manipulating topological charges via engineering zeros of wave functions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07101 (2024).

  57. Ville, J. et al. Loading and compression of a single two-dimensional Bose gas in an optical accordion. Phys. Rev. A 95, 013632 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bakkali-Hassani, B. et al. Realization of a Townes soliton in a two-component planar Bose gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 023603 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Lieb, E. H. & Liniger, W. Exact analysis of an interacting Bose gas. I. The general solution and the ground state. Phys. Rev. 130, 1605 (1963).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. van Kempen, E., Kokkelmans, S., Heinzen, D. & Verhaar, B. Interisotope determination of ultracold rubidium interactions from three high-precision experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093201 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Zou, Y.-Q. et al. Magnetic dipolar interaction between hyperfine clock states in a planar alkali Bose gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 233604 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. De, S. et al. Quenched binary Bose-Einstein condensates: spin-domain formation and coarsening. Phys. Rev. A 89, 033631 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Aidelsburger, M. et al. Relaxation dynamics in the merging of N independent condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 190403 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from the ERC (Grant Agreement No 863880). We thank N. Pavloff for sharing personal notes and A. Minguzzi, N. Cooper, W. Zwerger and M. Fleischhauer for fruitful discussions and C. Heintze for his participation at the early stage of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.R., G.C. and G.B. developed the experimental protocol, performed the experiments and analysed the data. S.N., J.D. and J.B. supervised the project. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and production of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Beugnon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Magnetic soliton at rest.

a, Absorption image of the minority component wave packet in \(\left\vert 2\right\rangle\). The axis of the tube is horizontal. The color is in arbitrary units proportional to the atomic surface density. The horizontal solid line corresponds to a length of 10 μm. b, Mean linear density along the tube direction (x). The solid line is a fit of the data to the analytical profile of the magnetic soliton. c, We vary the atom number transferred to the minority component and monitor the short time evolution of the size of the wave packet. Solid lines are fits of the function t σ0 + γt2 to the data. The error bars correspond to the statistical error obtained from the fit of the density profiles. d, Evolution of the expansion coefficient γ as a function of the atom number N2. The value Ns corresponds to the atom number for which the wave packet is stationary. This experiment thus demonstrates the realization of a magnetic soliton at rest. Error bars in c) d) represent the statistical errors obtained from the repetitions of each experiment.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Full width at half maximum and depletion of a magnetic soliton.

We focus on the soliton at rest (u = 0 and \(\tilde{J}=0\)). This graph is plotted using typical parameters of the experiment: n0 = 330 μm−1 and ξs = 2 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 3 The family of soliton solutions.

Each ellipse corresponds to a given value of \(\tilde{N}\). Each point of an ellipse is a soliton with a given velocity u and a given Ω. During a Bloch oscillation the system follows a trajectory from the bottom of ellipse at the initial time to the top of the ellipse at the first turning point and then comes back to its initial position. The shaded area is the region where no solitonic solutions exist, corresponding to Ω < u2/4 − 1.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Figs. 1–5 and discussion.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1 (download ZIP )

Density profile (b), center of mass position (c) of the soliton. Measured oscillation frequency for different parameters (d).

Source Data Fig. 3 (download ZIP )

Absorption images of the matter wave interference data for different hold times.

Source Data Fig. 4 (download ZIP )

Center of mass position and winding number for different hold times.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1 (download ZIP )

Density profile (b), width of the wave packet (c) and expansion coefficient (d) of the soliton.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rabec, F., Chauveau, G., Brochier, G. et al. Bloch oscillations of a soliton in a one-dimensional quantum fluid. Nat. Phys. 21, 1541–1547 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02970-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02970-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing