Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Magnon-Cherenkov effect from a picosecond strain pulse

Abstract

Cherenkov radiation is a universal phenomenon that arises from a uniformly moving source. It enables wave emission and finds important applications across various fields of physics, from particle physics to plasmonics. Efforts to explore the Cherenkov emission of coherent spin waves, or magnons, are currently limited by the absence of experimentally realized fast-moving magnetic perturbations. Here we demonstrate the magnon-Cherenkov effect by showing the emission of exchange spin waves. This emission is enabled by an optically induced picosecond strain pulse that acts as a spatially localized propagating perturbation of the internal effective magnetic field as a result of magnetoelastic coupling. We observe the propagation of a strain pulse through the thickness of a dielectric ferrimagnet, followed by the emission of spin waves that fully satisfy the conditions for the Cherenkov effect. The spectral characteristics of the emitted spin waves are controlled with an applied magnetic field and the shape of the strain pulse. Therefore, our results expand the possibilities to realize and control non-dissipative spin transport in various laterally and vertically structured magnonic devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Cherenkov emission of SWs from a propagating strain pulse.
Fig. 2: Time-resolved optical excitation of the strain pulse and detection of SWs.
Fig. 3: Magnetic field dependence of the excited magnetization dynamics.
Fig. 4: Micromagnetoelastic simulations of the Cherenkov emission of the SWs from the strain pulse.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the experimental data from this work are available through figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28351496 (ref. 60). Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Flebus, B. et al. The 2024 magnonics roadmap. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 36, 363501 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pirro, P., Vasyuchka, V. I., Serga, A. A. & Hillebrands, B. Advances in coherent magnonics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1114–1135 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chumak, A. V., Serga, A. A. & Hillebrands, B. Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing. Nat. Commun. 5, 4700 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahmoud, A. et al. Introduction to spin wave computing. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 161101 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Q. et al. A magnonic directional coupler for integrated magnonic half-adders. Nat. Electron. 3, 765–774 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Körber, L. et al. Pattern recognition in reciprocal space with a magnon-scattering reservoir. Nat. Commun. 14, 3954 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, C. et al. Enhancement of magnonic frequency combs by exceptional points. Nat. Phys. 20, 1139–1144 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chumak, A. V. et al. Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave computing. IEEE Trans. Magn. 58, 0800172 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Girardi, D. et al. Three-dimensional spin-wave dynamics, localization and interference in a synthetic antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 15, 3057 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wintz, S. et al. Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin-wave emitters. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 948–953 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu, H. et al. Approaching soft X-ray wavelengths in nanomagnet-based microwave technology. Nat. Commun. 7, 11255 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, H. et al. Reconfigurable nonreciprocal excitation of propagating exchange spin waves in perpendicularly magnetized yttrium iron garnet thin films. Phys. Rev. B 108, 134403 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, C. et al. Long-distance propagation of short-wavelength spin waves. Nat. Commun. 9, 738 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Talapatra, A. et al. Imaging of short-wavelength spin waves in a nanometer-thick YIG/Co bilayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 202404 (2023).

  15. Wang, Q. et al. Deeply nonlinear excitation of self-normalized short spin waves. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg4609 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolaev, K., Mohapatra, B. D., Schmidt, G., Demokritov, S. & Demidov, V. Spatially extended nonlinear generation of short-wavelength spin waves in yttrium iron garnet nanowaveguides. Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 044083 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ginzburg, V. L. Radiation by uniformly moving sources (Vavilov-Cherenkov effect, transition radiation, and other phenomena). Phys. Usp. 39, 973–982 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Čerenkov, P. A. Visible radiation produced by electrons moving in a medium with velocities exceeding that of light. Phys. Rev. 52, 378–379 (1937).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, F. et al. Integrated Cherenkov radiation emitter eliminating the electron velocity threshold. Nat. Photon. 11, 289–292 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Datta, T. Cherenkov magnon excitations by a sub-relativistic magnetic monopole. Phys. Lett. A 103, 243–246 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vorob’ev, P. V. & Kolokolov, I. V. Cherenkov emission of magnons by a slow monopole. JETP Lett. 67, 910 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaminer, I. et al. Efficient plasmonic emission by the quantum Čerenkov effect from hot carriers in graphene. Nat. Commun. 7, ncomms11880 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pogue, B. W. et al. Maps of in vivo oxygen pressure with submillimetre resolution and nanomolar sensitivity enabled by Cherenkov-excited luminescence scanned imaging. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 254–264 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan, M., Kákay, A., Andreas, C. & Hertel, R. Spin-Cherenkov effect and magnonic Mach cones. Phys. Rev. B 88, 220412 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khokhlov, N., Filatov, I. & Kalashnikova, A. Spatial asymmetry of optically excited spin waves in anisotropic ferromagnetic film. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 589, 171514 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Satoh, T. et al. Directional control of spin-wave emission by spatially shaped light. Nat. Photon. 6, 662–666 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dobrovolskiy, O. V. et al. Moving Abrikosov vortex lattices generate sub-40-nm magnons. Nat. Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-02024-w (2025).

  28. Yan, M. et al. Fast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes: suppression of Walker breakdown and Cherenkov-like spin wave emission. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 122505 (2011).

  29. Hertel, R. Ultrafast domain wall dynamics in magnetic nanotubes and nanowires. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 483002 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kimel, A. V., Kalashnikova, A. M., Pogrebna, A. & Zvezdin, A. K. Fundamentals and perspectives of ultrafast photoferroic recording. Phys. Rep. 852, 1–46 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsuda, O., Larciprete, M. C., Voti, R. L. & Wright, O. B. Fundamentals of picosecond laser ultrasonics. Ultrasonics 56, 3–20 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hioki, T., Hashimoto, Y. & Saitoh, E. Coherent oscillation between phonons and magnons. Commun. Phys. 5, 115 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kitaeva, V. F., Zharikov, E. V. & Chistyi, I. L. The properties of crystals with garnet structure. Phys. Status Solidi A 92, 475–488 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Scherbakov, A. V. et al. Coherent magnetization precession in ferromagnetic (Ga,Mn)As induced by picosecond acoustic pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 117204 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Deb, M. et al. Femtosecond laser-excitation-driven high frequency standing spin waves in nanoscale dielectric thin films of iron garnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 027202 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shelukhin, L. A. et al. Ultrafast laser-induced changes of the magnetic anisotropy in a low-symmetry iron garnet film. Phys. Rev. B 97, 014422 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gurevich, A. & Melkov, G. Magnetization Oscillations and Waves (CRC Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kats, V. N. et al. Ultrafast changes of magnetic anisotropy driven by laser-generated coherent and noncoherent phonons in metallic films. Phys. Rev. B 93, 214422 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wojtowicz, P. J. High temperature susceptibility of garnets: exchange interactions in YIG and LuIG. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 1257–1258 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeuschner, S. P. et al. Standing spin wave excitation in Bi:YIG films via temperature-induced anisotropy changes and magneto-elastic coupling. Phys. Rev. B 106, 134401 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Azovtsev, A. V. & Pertsev, N. A. Antiferromagnetic standing spin waves generated in NiO thin films by short strain pulses. Phys. Rev. B 110, 144430 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Akyol, M. et al. Structural, magnetic and optical properties of Au/YIG, YIG/Au and Au/YIG/Au multilayer thin film stacks. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 493, 165704 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dongquoc, V. et al. Extraordinary enhancement of magneto-optical Faraday rotation angle in Bi-YIG/Pt/glass prepared by metal organic decomposition method. Surf. Interfaces 51, 104652 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gerevenkov, P. I. et al. Three regimes of a picosecond magnetoacoustics in ferromagnetic structures. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09579 (2025).

  45. Zeuschner, S. P. et al. Tracking picosecond strain pulses in heterostructures that exhibit giant magnetostriction. Struct. Dyn. 6, 024302 (2019).

  46. Yaremkevich, D. D. et al. On-chip phonon-magnon reservoir for neuromorphic computing. Nat. Commun. 14, 8296 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Matsumoto, K. et al. Observation of evanescent spin waves in the magnetic dipole regime. Phys. Rev. B 101, 184407 (2020).

  48. Philippe, G., Moalic, M. & Kłos, J. W. Unidirectional spin wave emission by traveling pair of magnetic field profiles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 587, 171359 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Chumak, A. V., Serga, A. A. & Hillebrands, B. Magnonic crystals for data processing. J. Phys. D 50, 244001 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Liao, L., Liu, J., Puebla, J., Shao, Q. & Otani, Y. Hybrid magnon-phonon crystals. npj Spintron. 2, 47 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Luo, C., Ibanescu, M., Johnson, S. G. & Joannopoulos, J. D. Cerenkov radiation in photonic crystals. Science 299, 368–371 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. van Capel, P., Péronne, E. & Dijkhuis, J. Nonlinear ultrafast acoustics at the nano scale. Ultrasonics 56, 36–51 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhuang, S., Meisenheimer, P. B., Heron, J. & Hu, J.-M. A narrowband spintronic terahertz emitter based on magnetoelastic heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 48997–49006 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Doormann, V., Krumme, J. P., Klages, C. P. & Erman, M. Measurement of the refractive index and optical absorption spectra of epitaxial bismuth substituted yttrium iron garnet films at UV to near-IR wavelengths. Appl. Phys. A 34, 223–230 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hortensius, J. R. et al. Coherent spin-wave transport in an antiferromagnet. Nat. Phys. 17, 1001–1006 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Clark, A. E., DeSavage, B., Coleman, W., Callen, E. R. & Callen, H. B. Saturation magnetostriction of single-crystal YIG. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1296–1297 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Kamra, A., Keshtgar, H., Yan, P. & Bauer, G. E. W. Coherent elastic excitation of spin waves. Phys. Rev. B 91, 104409 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Azovtsev, A. V. & Pertsev, N. A. Magnetization dynamics and spin pumping induced by standing elastic waves. Phys. Rev. B 94, 184401 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ruello, P. & Gusev, V. E. Physical mechanisms of coherent acoustic phonons generation by ultrafast laser action. Ultrasonics 56, 21–35 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Filatov, I. A. et al. Magnon-Cherenkov effect from a picosecond strain pulse. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28351496 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank I. A. Mogunov and M. X. Na for fruitful discussions, and L. A. Snigirev for help with sample characterization. The work of I.A.F., A.V.A. and A.M.K. was supported by RSF grant number 23-12-00251 (https://rscf.ru/project/23-12-00251/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.A.F.: conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; software; supervision; validation; visualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. P.I.G.: data curation; formal analysis; methodology; resources; software; validation; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. A.V.A.: data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; software. V.A.K.: data curation; formal analysis; investigation. N.E.K.: conceptualization; methodology; project administration; supervision; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. A.M.K.: conceptualization; funding acquisition; methodology; project administration; resources; supervision; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iaroslav A. Filatov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Experimental time traces of 450 nm probe pulses polarization rotation under different Hext obtained when the pump is focused onto the Au/LuIG.

The left panel shows the enlarged area of the right one (dashed box).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Probe pulses sensitivity depending on the penetration depth.

a, Simulated time traces of the out-of-plane magnetization component Mz(t) obtained by spatial averaging with weights corresponding to the penetration profiles with different δpr. b, The FFT of the data from a.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Micromagnetoelastic simulations of the Cherenkov emission of the SWs by the strain pulse with duration of 70 ps.

a, Spatial snapshot of the normalized out-of-plane magnetization component Mz at t = 141 ps after the strain pulse injection. Grey area corresponds to the intensity profile of 450 nm probe with penetration depth δpr = 75 nm. b, Time trace Mz(t) obtained by spatial averaging with weights corresponding to the probe penetration profile. c, The FFT amplitude spectrum of the time trace from b. d, Spatial snapshot of the mechanical displacement uz (dashed line) and \(\frac{\partial {\rm{u}}_{z}}{\partial z}\) corresponding to the strain εzz(z) (solid line) at t = 141 ps. Strain pulse duration is 70 ps. e, Dispersion characteristic of the simulated acoustic pulse, obtained by the two-dimensional FFT of the spatio-temporal evolution of uz(z, t). Grey solid line corresponds to the LA phonon dispersion with Vs = 6.55 km s−1. f, Dispersion characteristic of the simulated magnetization dynamics obtained by the two-dimensional FFT of the spatio-temporal evolution of Mz(z, t). Grey line corresponds to the LA phonon dispersion, and dark blue curve corresponds to the exchange SWs dispersion calculated with equation (3) in the main text. Note that the analytically calculated dispersion curves are shown only in the positive range of wavenumbers k for clarity. The external magnetic field is μ0Hext = 0.4 T.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Pump-probe experimental results obtained with probe pulses with central wavelength of 900 nm.

a, Time traces of probe polarization rotation when the pump is focused onto the Au/LuIG (blue line) and onto the LuIG (red line). b, The FFT of the data from a. c,d, Field dependencies of the FFT of the polarization rotation time traces when the pump is focused onto the LuIG and onto the Au/LuIG, respectively.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Experimentally obtained spectra containing frequency combs.

Spectra are cross-sections of Fig. 3a in the main text at μ0Hext = 0.35, 0.45, 0.55 T. Dashed vertical arrows indicate frequencies separated by fr = 1.88 GHz.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Dependence of the magnetization dynamics frequency on the azimuthal orientation of the external magnetic field.

The color map corresponds to the FFT of the time traces measured with the applied in-plane field μ0Hext = 415 mT. Dashed red line corresponds to the fit of the FMR frequency versus the in-plane orientation of the magnetic field, obtained using the Smit-Beljers approach. Dashed line represents the central prediction of the model using the best-fit parameters. Shaded band represents the uncertainty in the model’s prediction, propagated from a ± 5 in-plane field alignment error and a ± 10 mT field magnitude error.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video 1 (download MP4 )

Cherenkov emission of SWs by a strain pulse with a total duration of 20 ps obtained from micromagnetoelastic simulations. The top and bottom panels illustrate the time evolution of the spatial distribution of the normalized out-of-plane magnetization component and mechanical displacement across the thickness of LuIG.

Supplementary Video 2 (download MP4 )

Cherenkov emission of SWs by a strain pulse with a total duration of 70 ps obtained from micromagnetoelastic simulations. The top and bottom panels illustrate the time evolution of the spatial distribution of the normalized out-of-plane magnetization component and mechanical displacement across the thickness of LuIG.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filatov, I.A., Gerevenkov, P.I., Azovtsev, A.V. et al. Magnon-Cherenkov effect from a picosecond strain pulse. Nat. Phys. 22, 252–258 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-03137-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-03137-8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing