Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Detection of atmospheric 42Ar at the 10−21 level by atom counting

Abstract

The lowest detectable abundances with accelerator mass spectrometry remain limited by persistent background interferences from atomic and molecular isobars as well as neighbouring isotopes. Such interference is eliminated by laser-based atom trap trace analysis that captures individual atoms through resonant photon scattering. Its detection limit solely depends on the atom counting rate and data acquisition duration. Here we report the direct detection of atmospheric 42Ar at an isotopic abundance level of 10−21 by combining atom trap trace analysis with an isotope pre-enrichment process, achieving a detection limit several orders of magnitude beyond existing methods. Our measurement consumed only 10 l of argon at standard temperature and pressure. This result demonstrates a powerful tool for detecting isotopes at previously inaccessible abundance levels, with implications for environmental dating and background characterization in next-generation liquid-argon detectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic of ATTA and pre-enrichment systems.
Fig. 2: Single-atom fluorescence signal of 42Ar.
Fig. 3: Determination of trapping parameters for 42Ar.
Fig. 4: Isotopic abundance of 42Ar in the atmosphere.

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Stoenner, R. W., Schaeffer, O. A. & Katcoff, S. Half-lives of argon-37, argon-39, and argon-42. Science 148, 1325–1328 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peurrung, A. J., Bowyer, T. W., Craig, R. A. & Reeder, P. L. Expected atmospheric concentration of 42Ar. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 396, 425–426 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cennini, P. et al. On atmospheric 39Ar and 42Ar abundance. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 356, 526–529 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barabash, A. S., Kornoukhov, V. N. & Jants, V. E. Estimate of the 42Ar content in the Earth’s atmosphere. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 385, 530–534 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander, T. et al. The low-radioactivity underground argon workshop: a workshop synopsis. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10108 (2019).

  6. Ashitkov, V. D. et al. New experimental limit on the 42Ar content in the Earth’s atmosphere. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 416, 179–181 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashitkov, V. D. et al. A liquid-argon ionization detector for the study of double β decay. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 46, 153–160 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Agostini, M. The background in the 0νββ experiment Gerda. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2764 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barabash, A. S., Saakyan, R. R. & Umatov, V. I. On concentration of 42Ar in the Earth’s atmosphere. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 839, 39–42 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ajaj, R. et al. Electromagnetic backgrounds and potassium-42 activity in the DEAP-3600 dark matter detector. Phys. Rev. D 100, 072009 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kutschera, W., Jull, A. T., Paul, M. & Wallner, A. Atom counting with accelerator mass spectrometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035006 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martschini, M. et al. Selective laser photodetachment of intense atomic and molecular negative ion beams with the ILIAS RFQ ion beam cooler. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 415, 9–17 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paul, M. et al. Heavy ion separation with a gas-filled magnetic spectrograph. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 277, 418–430 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lachner, J. et al. Highly sensitive 26Al measurements by ion-laser-interaction mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 465, 116576 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, C. Y. et al. Ultrasensitive isotope trace analyses with a magneto-optical trap. Science 286, 1139–1141 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, J. S. et al. Optical excitation and trapping of 81Kr. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 023201 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, W. et al. 39Ar detection at the 10−16 isotopic abundance level with atom trap trace analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 103001 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia, T. Y. et al. Atom-trap trace analysis of 41Ca/Ca down to the 10−17 level. Nat. Phys. 19, 904–908 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, J.-Y. et al. A redetermination of the isotopic abundances of atmospheric Ar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 4507–4512 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan, J. W. et al. A magnetically enhanced RF discharge source for metastable krypton production. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94, 033202 (2023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jia, Z. H. et al. An electromagnetic separation system for the enrichment of 39Ar. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 033309 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aseev, V., Ostroumov, P., Lessner, E. & Mustapha, B. TRACK: the new beam dynamics code. In Proc. IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference 2053–2055 (IEEE, 2005).

  23. Williams, W. et al. Spectroscopic study of the cycling transition 4s[3/2]2–4p[5/2]3 at 811.8 nm in 39Ar: hyperfine structure and isotope shift. Phys. Rev. A 83, 012512 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Blaum, K. et al. Nuclear moments and charge radii of argon isotopes between the neutron-shell closures N = 20 and N = 28. Nucl. Phys. A 799, 30–45 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang, R. S. F. & Setser, D. W. Radiative lifetimes and two-body deactivation rate constants for Ar(3p5, 4p) and Ar(3p5,4p′) states. J. Chem. Phys. 69, 3885–3897 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Townsend, C. G. et al. Phase-space density in the magneto-optical trap. Phys. Rev. A 52, 1423–1440 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Glover, R. D., Calvert, J. E. & Sang, R. T. Population dynamics in a metastable neon magneto-optical trap. Phys. Rev. A 87, 023415 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kemp, K. J. et al. Optical-depth scaling of light scattering from a dense and cold atomic 87Rb gas. Phys. Rev. A 101, 033832 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chabé, J. et al. Coherent and incoherent multiple scattering. Phys. Rev. A 89, 043833 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Agnes, P. et al. Results from the first use of low radioactivity argon in a dark matter search. Phys. Rev. D 93, 081101 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Aalseth, C. E. et al. DarkSide-20k: a 20 tonne two-phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter detection at LNGS. The Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 131 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Williams, M. R., Chi, F., Cashen, M. T. & Metcalf, H. Measurement of the bichromatic optical force on Rb atoms. Phys. Rev. A 60, R1763–R1766 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Joffe, M. A., Ketterle, W., Martin, A. & Pritchard, D. E. Transverse cooling and deflection of an atomic beam inside a Zeeman slower. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 2257–2262 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tong, A. L. et al. An atom trap system for 39Ar dating with improved precision. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 063204 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lu, Z.-T. et al. Tracer applications of noble gas radionuclides in the geosciences. Earth-Sci. Rev. 138, 196–214 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ritterbusch, F. et al. A Tibetan ice core covering the past 1,300 years radiometrically dated with 39Ar. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200835119 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eustice, S., Cassella, K. & Stamper-Kurn, D. Laser cooling of transition-metal atoms. Phys. Rev. A 102, 053327 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bohn, J. L., Rey, A. M. & Ye, J. Cold molecules: progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quantum matter. Science 357, 1002–1010 (2017).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Thornton, B. F. & Burdette, S. C. Neutron stardust and the elements of Earth. Nat. Chem. 11, 4–10 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Davis, A. M. & McKeegan, K. D. in Treatise on Geochemistry (eds Holland, H. D. & Turekian, K. K.) 361–395 (Elsevier, 2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W.-H. Wang, M.-J. Zhang, Y.-J. Zhang and J.-Y. Wu for their assistance in the extraction of pre-enriched samples. We thank H. Li for his assistance in the mass spectrometry measurements. This work is funded by the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (2021ZD0303101), National Natural Science Foundation of China (12474269, 41727901, 12205343 and 12025506) and Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Z.-F.W., J.W.L., W.J., Z.-T.L. and G.M.Y. developed the ATTA system. Z.H.J. and L.T.S. developed the pre-enrichment system. J.W.L. and Z.H.J. completed the enrichment of 42Ar. Z.-F.W. performed the ATTA measurements of 42Ar abundance. All authors contributed to the discussion of the results and writing of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to W. Jiang or Z.-T. Lu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks Niels Bidaultand, Béla Majorovits and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of ATTA apparatus for argon isotopes.

The argon beam is excited to the metastable 4 s[3/2]2 state in the RF discharge source. Metastable argon atoms are transversely cooled and focused through pre‑collimation, transverse cooling (TC), and a 2D‑MOT, then longitudinally decelerated in a Zeeman slower (ZSL), and finally captured in a magneto‑optical trap (MOT). Arrows in the diagram indicate the 811.8 nm laser beams.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Energy level diagram of argon relevant to the ATTA measurement.

The red arrow denotes the 811.8 nm transition used for laser cooling, trapping, and detection of metastable argon atoms. The orange arrow indicates the quench transition, which de‑excites metastable atoms to the ground state.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Dependence of the 38Ar loading rate on the MOT laser detuning.

The loading rate of 38Ar is normalized to the maximum value achieved at the optimal detuning of -14.5 MHz. The error bars denote one standard deviation.

Source data

Extended Data Table 1 Isotope shifts of argon isotopes relative to 38Ar on the 811.8 nm cooling transition

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Sections 1–10, Figs. 1–9, Tables 1 and 2, and discussion.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1 (download XLSX )

Source data for the simulated and measured Ar+ beam profiles on the target plane.

Source Data Fig. 2 (download XLSX )

Source data for the single-atom fluorescence signal of 42Ar.

Source Data Fig. 3 (download XLSX )

Source data for the single-atom signal versus MOT detuning and MOT laser power.

Source Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

Source data for the the isotopic abundance of 42Ar in the atmosphere.

Source Data Extended Data Fig./Table 3 (download XLSX )

Source data for the the 38Ar loading rate versus the MOT laser detuning.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, ZF., Liang, J.W., Jia, Z.H. et al. Detection of atmospheric 42Ar at the 10−21 level by atom counting. Nat. Phys. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03257-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03257-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing