The disparities amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic present disturbing evidence that we are far from cardiovascular health-care equity. Individuals, leaders and institutions must prioritize research, policies and structures to advance diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging — Diversity 4.0, a justice imperative, essential to advancing workforce excellence and cardiovascular health.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References
Nivet, M. A. Commentary: Diversity 3.0: a necessary systems upgrade. Acad. Med. 86, 1487–1489 (2011).
National Science Foundation (NSF). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/ (2019).
AlShebli, B. K., Rahwan, T. & Woon, W. L. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration. Nat. Commun. 9, 5163 (2018).
Burgess, S. et al. Gender equity within medical specialties of Australia and New Zealand: cardiology’s outlier status. Intern. Med. J. 50, 412–419 (2020).
Khan, M. S. et al. Women training in cardiology and its subspecialties in the United States: a decade of little progress in representation. Circulation 141, 609–611 (2020).
Shah, R. U. The $2.5 million wage gap in cardiology. JAMA Cardiol. 3, 674–676 (2018).
Hall, N. The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists. Genome Biol. 15, 424 (2014).
Lewis, S. J. et al. Changes in the professional lives of cardiologists over 2 decades. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 69, 452–462 (2017).
Youngclaus, J. & Roskovensky, L. An Updated Look at the Economic Diversity of U.S. Medical Students https://www.aamc.org/system/files/reports/1/october2018anupdatedlookattheeconomicdiversityofu.s.medicalstud.pdf (2018).
Carnes, M. et al. Effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad. Med. 90, 221–230 (2015).
Acknowledgements
R.B.S. has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 648131 and No. 847770 (AFFECT-EU), and from the German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.) (81Z1710103), the German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF 01ZX1408A) and ERACoSysMed3 (031L0239). E.J.B. receives funding from the NIH (2U54HL120163; R01HL092577; R01HL141434; R01AG066010; 1R01AG066914) and the AHA (18SFRN34110082).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
R.B.S. has received lecture fees from BMS and Pfizer. E.J.B. declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schnabel, R.B., Benjamin, E.J. Diversity 4.0 in the cardiovascular health-care workforce. Nat Rev Cardiol 17, 751–753 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-00462-8
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-00462-8
This article is cited by
-
A roadmap of strategies to support cardiovascular researchers: from policy to practice
Nature Reviews Cardiology (2022)
-
Beyond tokenism and objectivity: theoretical reflections on a transformative equity, diversity, and inclusion agenda for higher education in Canada
SN Social Sciences (2022)