Abstract
The nucleolus is the site of ribosomal RNA synthesis and ribosome biogenesis. Advances in high-resolution imaging and next-generation sequencing have unveiled unprecedented details of its intricate architecture and dynamic organization. In this Review, we focus on the dynamic organization of mammalian nucleoli, while drawing selective comparisons with other organisms to highlight conserved and divergent principles of nucleolar organization. We discuss recent progress in deciphering the multilayered compartments of nucleoli, the physical principles driving their organization and dynamics, and their functional interplay during stepwise ribosomal RNA processing, ribosome assembly and maintenance of compartment integrity. We also discuss how disruptions of nucleolar structure–function relationships can drive cellular stresses and diseases, offering new opportunities for therapeutic interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).
Mittag, T. & Pappu, R. V. A conceptual framework for understanding phase separation and addressing open questions and challenges. Mol. Cell 82, 2201–2214 (2022).
Hirose, T., Ninomiya, K., Nakagawa, S. & Yamazaki, T. A guide to membraneless organelles and their various roles in gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 288–304 (2022).
Mao, Y. S., Zhang, B. & Spector, D. L. Biogenesis and function of nuclear bodies. Trends Genet. 27, 295–306 (2011).
Pappu, R. V., Cohen, S. R., Dar, F., Farag, M. & Kar, M. Phase transitions of associative biomacromolecules. Chem. Rev. 123, 8945–8987 (2023).
Villegas, J. A., Heidenreich, M. & Levy, E. D. Molecular and environmental determinants of biomolecular condensate formation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 1319–1329 (2022).
Wadsworth, G. M. et al. RNA-driven phase transitions in biomolecular condensates. Mol. Cell 84, 3692–3705 (2024).
Schwarzacher, H. G. & Wachtler, F. Nucleolus organizer regions and nucleoli. Hum. Genet. 63, 89–99 (1983).
Pederson, T. The nucleolus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000638 (2011).
King, M. R., Ruff, K. M. & Pappu, R. V. Emergent microenvironments of nucleoli. Nucleus 15, 2319957 (2024).
Lafontaine, D. L. J., Riback, J. A., Bascetin, R. & Brangwynne, C. P. The nucleolus as a multiphase liquid condensate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 165–182 (2021).
Stenstrom, L. et al. Mapping the nucleolar proteome reveals a spatiotemporal organization related to intrinsic protein disorder. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9469 (2020).
Boisvert, F. M., van Koningsbruggen, S., Navascues, J. & Lamond, A. I. The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 574–585 (2007).
Lazdins, I. B., Delannoy, M. & Sollner-Webb, B. Analysis of nucleolar transcription and processing domains and pre-rRNA movements by in situ hybridization. Chromosoma 105, 481–495 (1997).
Thiry, M. & Lafontaine, D. L. Birth of a nucleolus: the evolution of nucleolar compartments. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 194–199 (2005).
Stanek, D. et al. Non-isotopic mapping of ribosomal RNA synthesis and processing in the nucleolus. Chromosoma 110, 460–470 (2001).
Yao, R. W. et al. Nascent pre-rRNA sorting via phase separation drives the assembly of dense fibrillar components in the human nucleolus. Mol. Cell 76, 767–783 (2019).
Shan, L. et al. Nucleolar URB1 ensures 3′ ETS rRNA removal to prevent exosome surveillance. Nature 615, 526–534 (2023).
Dodel, M. et al. TREX reveals proteins that bind to specific RNA regions in living cells. Nat. Methods 21, 423–434 (2024).
Olson, M. O., Dundr, M. & Szebeni, A. The nucleolus: an old factory with unexpected capabilities. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 189–196 (2000).
Leung, A. K. & Lamond, A. I. The dynamics of the nucleolus. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 13, 39–54 (2003).
Riback, J. A. et al. Viscoelasticity and advective flow of RNA underlies nucleolar form and function. Mol. Cell 83, 3095–3107 (2023).
Erdmann, P. S. et al. In situ cryo-electron tomography reveals gradient organization of ribosome biogenesis in intact nucleoli. Nat. Commun. 12, 5364 (2021).
Riback, J. A. et al. Composition-dependent thermodynamics of intracellular phase separation. Nature 581, 209–214 (2020).
Calo, E. et al. Tissue-selective effects of nucleolar stress and rDNA damage in developmental disorders. Nature 554, 112–117 (2018).
Lee, T. A. et al. The nucleolus is the site for inflammatory RNA decay during infection. Nat. Commun. 13, 5203 (2022).
Sirozh, O. et al. Nucleolar stress caused by arginine-rich peptides triggers a ribosomopathy and accelerates aging in mice. Mol. Cell 84, 1527–1540 (2024).
Ma, K. et al. Ribosomal RNA regulates chromosome clustering during mitosis. Cell Discov. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-022-00400-7 (2022).
Yamamoto, T., Yamazaki, T., Ninomiya, K. & Hirose, T. Nascent ribosomal RNA act as surfactant that suppresses growth of fibrillar centers in nucleolus. Commun. Biol. 6, 1129 (2023).
Quinodoz, S. A. et al. Mapping and engineering RNA-driven architecture of the multiphase nucleolus. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09207-4 (2025).
Xing, Y. H. et al. SLERT regulates DDX21 rings associated with Pol I transcription. Cell 169, 664–678 (2017).
Savić, N. et al. lncRNA maturation to initiate heterochromatin formation in the nucleolus is required for exit from pluripotency in ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 15, 720–734 (2014).
Wu, M. et al. lncRNA SLERT controls phase separation of FC/DFCs to facilitate Pol I transcription. Science 373, 547–555 (2021).
Wang, X. et al. Mutual dependency between lncRNA LETN and protein NPM1 in controlling the nucleolar structure and functions sustaining cell proliferation. Cell Res. 31, 664–683 (2021).
Pan, Y.-H. et al. Pre-rRNA spatial distribution and functional organization of the nucleolus. Nature 646, 227–235 (2025).
Banani, S. F. et al. Active RNA synthesis patterns nuclear condensates. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.12.614958 (2024).
Frottin, F. et al. The nucleolus functions as a phase-separated protein quality control compartment. Science 365, 342–347 (2019).
Lafontaine, J. G. & Chouinard, L. A. A correlated light and electron microscope study of the nucleolar material during mitosis in Vicia faba. J. Cell Biol. 17, 167–201 (1963).
Derenzini, M., Pasquinelli, G., O’Donohue, M. F., Ploton, D. & Thiry, M. Structural and functional organization of ribosomal genes within the mammalian cell nucleolus. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 54, 131–145 (2006).
Noel, J. S., Dewey, W. C., Abel, J. H. & Thompson, R. P. Ultrastructure of the nucleolus during the Chinese hamster cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 49, 830–847 (1971).
Cour, L. F. & Wells, B. The loops and ultrastructure of the nucleolus of Ipheion uniflorum. Z. Zellforsch. 82, 25–45 (1967).
Miller, O. L. Jr. & Beatty, B. R. Visualization of nucleolar genes. Science 164, 955–957 (1969).
Raska, I. Oldies but goldies: searching for Christmas trees within the nucleolar architecture. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 517–525 (2003).
Chooi, W. Y. & Leiby, K. R. An electron microscopic method for localization of ribosomal proteins during transcription of ribosomal DNA: a method for studying protein assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 4823–4827 (1981).
Ritossa, F. M. & Spiegelman, S. Localization of DNA complementary to ribosomal rna in the nucleolus organizer region of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 53, 737–745 (1965).
Gustafsson, M. G. Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. J. Microsc. 198, 82–87 (2000).
Klar, T. A., Jakobs, S., Dyba, M., Egner, A. & Hell, S. W. Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8206–8210 (2000).
Rust, M. J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods 3, 793–796 (2006).
Femino, A. M., Fay, F. S., Fogarty, K. & Singer, R. H. Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. Science 280, 585–590 (1998).
Feric, M. et al. Coexisting liquid phases underlie nucleolar subcompartments. Cell 165, 1686–1697 (2016).
Fazal, F. M. et al. Atlas of subcellular RNA localization revealed by APEX-Seq. Cell 178, 473–490 (2019).
Raulf, A. et al. Click chemistry facilitates direct labelling and super-resolution imaging of nucleic acids and proteins. RSC Adv. 4, 30462–30466 (2014).
Szczurek, A., Xing, J., Birk, U. J. & Cremer, C. Single molecule localization microscopy of mammalian cell nuclei on the nanoscale. Front. Genet. 7, 114 (2016).
Smirnov, E. et al. Separation of replication and transcription domains in nucleoli. J. Struct. Biol. 188, 259–266 (2014).
Cheutin, T. et al. Three-dimensional organization of active rRNA genes within the nucleolus. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3297–3307 (2002).
Maiser, A. et al. Super-resolution in situ analysis of active ribosomal DNA chromatin organization in the nucleolus. Sci. Rep. 10, 7462 (2020).
McStay, B. & Grummt, I. The epigenetics of rRNA genes: from molecular to chromosome biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 131–157 (2008).
Leary, D. J., Terns, M. P. & Huang, S. Components of U3 snoRNA-containing complexes shuttle between nuclei and the cytoplasm and differentially localize in nucleoli: implications for assembly and function. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 281–293 (2004).
Andersen, J. S. et al. Directed proteomic analysis of the human nucleolus. Curr. Biol. 12, 1–11 (2002).
Andersen, J. S. et al. Nucleolar proteome dynamics. Nature 433, 77–83 (2005).
Scherl, A. et al. Functional proteomic analysis of human nucleolus. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 4100–4109 (2002).
Thul, P. J. et al. A subcellular map of the human proteome. Science 356, eaal3321 (2017).
Olson, M. O. & Dundr, M. The moving parts of the nucleolus. Histochem. Cell Biol. 123, 203–216 (2005).
Meier, U. T. & Blobel, G. Nopp140 shuttles on tracks between nucleolus and cytoplasm. Cell 70, 127–138 (1992).
Fox, A. H., Bond, C. S. & Lamond, A. I. P54nrb forms a heterodimer with PSP1 that localizes to paraspeckles in an RNA-dependent manner. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 5304–5315 (2005).
Chen, L. L. & Carmichael, G. G. Altered nuclear retention of mRNAs containing inverted repeats in human embryonic stem cells: functional role of a nuclear noncoding RNA. Mol. Cell 35, 467–478 (2009).
Sasaki, Y. T. F., Ideue, T., Sano, M., Mituyama, T. & Hirose, T. MENε/β noncoding RNAs are essential for structural integrity of nuclear paraspeckles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2525–2530 (2009).
Clemson, C. M. et al. An architectural role for a nuclear noncoding RNA: NEAT1 RNA is essential for the structure of paraspeckles. Mol. Cell 33, 717–726 (2009).
Phair, R. D. & Misteli, T. High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. Nature 404, 604–609 (2000).
Snaar, S., Wiesmeijer, K., Jochemsen, A. G., Tanke, H. J. & Dirks, R. W. Mutational analysis of fibrillarin and its mobility in living human cells. J. Cell Biol. 151, 653–662 (2000).
Chen, D. & Huang, S. Nucleolar components involved in ribosome biogenesis cycle between the nucleolus and nucleoplasm in interphase cells. J. Cell Biol. 153, 169–176 (2001).
Huh, W. K. et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686–691 (2003).
Mahdessian, D. et al. Spatiotemporal dissection of the cell cycle with single-cell proteogenomics. Nature 590, 649–654 (2021).
Sheval, E. V., Polzikov, M. A., Olson, M. O. & Zatsepina, O. V. A higher concentration of an antigen within the nucleolus may prevent its proper recognition by specific antibodies. Eur. J. Histochem. 49, 117–123 (2005).
Hernandez-Verdun, D. Assembly and disassembly of the nucleolus during the cell cycle. Nucleus 2, 189–194 (2011).
Gautier, T. et al. Identification and characterization of a new set of nucleolar ribonucleoproteins which line the chromosomes during mitosis. Exp. Cell Res. 200, 5–15 (1992).
Angelier, N. et al. Tracking the interactions of rRNA processing proteins during nucleolar assembly in living cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 2862–2871 (2005).
Takata, H. et al. A comparative proteome analysis of human metaphase chromosomes isolated from two different cell lines reveals a set of conserved chromosome-associated proteins. Genes Cells 12, 269–284 (2007).
van Schaik, T. et al. Dynamic chromosomal interactions and control of heterochromatin positioning by Ki-67. EMBO Rep. 23, e55782 (2022).
Cuylen, S. et al. Ki-67 acts as a biological surfactant to disperse mitotic chromosomes. Nature 535, 308–312 (2016).
Leung, A. K. et al. Quantitative kinetic analysis of nucleolar breakdown and reassembly during mitosis in live human cells. J. Cell Biol. 166, 787–800 (2004).
Falahati, H., Pelham-Webb, B., Blythe, S. & Wieschaus, E. Nucleation by rRNA dictates the precision of nucleolus assembly. Curr. Biol. 26, 277–285 (2016).
Pederson, T. The plurifunctional nucleolus. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3871–3876 (1998).
Mullineux, S.-T. & Lafontaine, D. L. J. Mapping the cleavage sites on mammalian pre-rRNAs: where do we stand? Biochimie 94, 1521–1532 (2012).
Kressler, D., Hurt, E. & Baβler, J. Driving ribosome assembly. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1803, 673–683 (2010).
Henras, A. K., Plisson-Chastang, C., O’Donohue, M. F., Chakraborty, A. & Gleizes, P. E. An overview of pre-ribosomal RNA processing in eukaryotes. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 6, 225–242 (2015).
Lafontaine, D. & Tollervey, D. Trans-acting factors in yeast pre-rRNA and pre-snoRNA processing. Biochem. Cell Biol. 73, 803–812 (1995).
Kos, M. & Tollervey, D. Yeast pre-rRNA processing and modification occur cotranscriptionally. Mol. Cell 37, 809–820 (2010).
Fernandez-Pevida, A., Kressler, D. & de la Cruz, J. Processing of preribosomal RNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 6, 191–209 (2015).
Dörner, K., Ruggeri, C., Zemp, I. & Kutay, U. Ribosome biogenesis factors — from names to functions. EMBO J. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022112699 (2023).
Ameismeier, M. et al. Structural basis for the final steps of human 40S ribosome maturation. Nature 587, 683–687 (2020).
Singh, S., Vanden Broeck, A., Miller, L., Chaker-Margot, M. & Klinge, S. Nucleolar maturation of the human small subunit processome. Science 373, eabj5338 (2021).
Liang, X. et al. Structural snapshots of human pre-60S ribosomal particles before and after nuclear export. Nat. Commun. 11, 3542 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. Visualizing the nucleoplasmic maturation of human pre-60S ribosomal particles. Cell Res. 33, 867–878 (2023).
Ameismeier, M., Cheng, J., Berninghausen, O. & Beckmann, R. Visualizing late states of human 40S ribosomal subunit maturation. Nature 558, 249–253 (2018).
Mitterer, V. & Pertschy, B. RNA folding and functions of RNA helicases in ribosome biogenesis. RNA Biol. 19, 781–810 (2022).
O’Dea, R. et al. Molecular basis for ubiquitin/Fubi cross-reactivity in USP16 and USP36. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1394–1405 (2023).
Aquino, G. R. R. et al. The RNA helicase Dbp7 promotes domain V/VI compaction and stabilization of inter-domain interactions during early 60S assembly. Nat. Commun. 12, 6152 (2021).
Du, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structure of 90S small ribosomal subunit precursors in transition states. Science 369, 1477–1481 (2020).
Pirouz, M., Munafò, M., Ebrahimi, A. G., Choe, J. & Gregory, R. I. Exonuclease requirements for mammalian ribosomal RNA biogenesis and surveillance. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 490–500 (2019).
Narla, A. & Ebert, B. L. Ribosomopathies: human disorders of ribosome dysfunction. Blood 115, 3196–3205 (2010).
Farley-Barnes, K. I., Ogawa, L. M. & Baserga, S. J. Ribosomopathies: old concepts, new controversies. Trends Genet. 35, 754–767 (2019).
Kang, J. et al. Ribosomal proteins and human diseases: molecular mechanisms and targeted therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00728-8 (2021).
Tafforeau, L. et al. The complexity of human ribosome biogenesis revealed by systematic nucleolar screening of pre-rRNA processing factors. Mol. Cell 51, 539–551 (2013).
Hasina, R. et al. NOL7 is a nucleolar candidate tumor suppressor gene in cervical cancer that modulates the angiogenic phenotype. Oncogene 25, 588–598 (2005).
Zhang, X., Azhar, G., Zhong, Y. & Wei, J. Y. Identification of a novel serum response factor cofactor in cardiac gene regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 55626–55632 (2004).
Chen, H. K., Pai, C. Y., Huang, J. Y. & Yeh, N. H. Human Nopp140, which interacts with RNA polymerase I: implications for rRNA gene transcription and nucleolar structural organization. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 8536–8546 (1999).
Jaberi-Lashkari, N., Lee, B., Aryan, F. & Calo, E. An evolutionarily nascent architecture underlying the formation and emergence of biomolecular condensates. Cell Rep. 42, 112955 (2023).
Pilsl, M. & Engel, C. Structural basis of RNA polymerase I pre-initiation complex formation and promoter melting. Nat. Commun. 11, 1206 (2020).
Korgaonkar, C. et al. Nucleophosmin (B23) targets ARF to nucleoli and inhibits its function. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 1258–1271 (2005).
Scheer, U., Thiry, M. & Goessens, G. Structure, function and assembly of the nucleolus. Trends Cell Biol. 3, 236–241 (1993).
Quinodoz, S. A. & Guttman, M. Essential roles for RNA in shaping nuclear organization. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a039719 (2022).
Newby Lambert, M. et al. Mg2+-induced compaction of single RNA molecules monitored by tethered particle microscopy. Biophys. J. 90, 3672–3685 (2006).
An, W., Yan, Y. & Ye, K. High resolution landscape of ribosomal RNA processing and surveillance. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 10630–10644 (2024).
Tomecki, R., Sikorski, P. J. & Zakrzewska-Placzek, M. Comparison of preribosomal RNA processing pathways in yeast, plant and human cells — focus on coordinated action of endo- and exoribonucleases. FEBS Lett. 591, 1801–1850 (2017).
Enright, C. A., Maxwell, E. S., Eliceiri, G. L. & Sollner-Webb, B. 5′ETS rRNA processing facilitated by four small RNAs: U14, E3, U17, and U3. RNA 2, 1094–1099 (1996).
Allmang, C. & Tollervey, D. The role of the 3′ external transcribed spacer in yeast pre-rRNA processing. J. Mol. Biol. 278, 67–78 (1998).
Peculis, B. A. & Steitz, J. A. Disruption of U8 nucleolar snRNA inhibits 5.8S and 28S rRNA processing in the Xenopus oocyte. Cell 73, 1233–1245 (1993).
Srivastava, L., Lapik, Y. R., Wang, M. & Pestov, D. G. Mammalian DEAD box protein Ddx51 acts in 3′ end maturation of 28S rRNA by promoting the release of U8 snoRNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 30, 2947–2956 (2010).
Langhendries, J. L., Nicolas, E., Doumont, G., Goldman, S. & Lafontaine, D. L. The human box C/D snoRNAs U3 and U8 are required for pre-rRNA processing and tumorigenesis. Oncotarget 7, 59519–59534 (2016).
Preti, M. et al. Gradual processing of the ITS1 from the nucleolus to the cytoplasm during synthesis of the human 18S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4709–4723 (2013).
Wang, M., Anikin, L. & Pestov, D. G. Two orthogonal cleavages separate subunit RNAs in mouse ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 11180–11191 (2014).
Wu, S. et al. Diverse roles of assembly factors revealed by structures of late nuclear pre-60S ribosomes. Nature 534, 133–137 (2016).
Schillewaert, S., Wacheul, L., Lhomme, F. & Lafontaine, D. L. J. The evolutionarily conserved protein LAS1 is required for pre-rRNA processing at both ends of ITS2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 430–444 (2023).
Fromm, L. et al. Reconstitution of the complete pathway of ITS2 processing at the pre-ribosome. Nat. Commun. 8, 1787 (2017).
Van Treeck, B. & Parker, R. Emerging roles for intermolecular RNA–RNA interactions in RNP assemblies. Cell 174, 791–802 (2018).
Berry, J., Weber, S. C., Vaidya, N., Haataja, M. & Brangwynne, C. P. RNA transcription modulates phase transition-driven nuclear body assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5237–E5245 (2015).
Santoliquido, P. M., Southwick, H. W. & Olwin, J. H. Trace metal levels in cancer of the breast. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 142, 65–70 (1976).
Lai, D., Proctor, J. R. & Meyer, I. M. On the importance of cotranscriptional RNA structure formation. RNA 19, 1461–1473 (2013).
Shine, M. et al. Co-transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 534–554 (2024).
Chauvier, A. & Walter, N. G. Regulation of bacterial gene expression by non-coding RNA: it is all about time!. Cell Chem. Biol. 31, 71–85 (2024).
Gong, S., Wang, Y., Wang, Z. & Zhang, W. Co-transcriptional folding and regulation mechanisms of riboswitches. Molecules 22, 1169 (2017).
Mahen, E. M., Harger, J. W., Calderon, E. M. & Fedor, M. J. Kinetics and thermodynamics make different contributions to RNA folding in vitro and in yeast. Mol. Cell 19, 27–37 (2005).
Jackson, S. A., Koduvayur, S. & Woodson, S. A. Self-splicing of a group I intron reveals partitioning of native and misfolded RNA populations in yeast. RNA 12, 2149–2159 (2006).
Scharfen, L., Vock, I. W., Simon, M. D. & Neugebauer, K. M. Rapid folding of nascent RNA regulates eukaryotic RNA biogenesis. Mol. Cell 85, 1561–1574 (2025).
Petfalski, E., Winz, M. L., Grelewska-Nowotko, K., Turowski, T. W. & Tollervey, D. Multiple mechanisms of termination modulate the dynamics of RNAPI transcription. Cell Rep. 44, 115325 (2025).
Turowski, T. W. et al. Nascent transcript folding plays a major role in determining RNA polymerase elongation rates. Mol. Cell 79, 488–503 (2020).
Duss, O., Stepanyuk, G. A., Puglisi, J. D. & Williamson, J. R. Transient protein–RNA interactions guide nascent ribosomal RNA folding. Cell 179, 1357–1369 (2019).
Rodgers, M. L. & Woodson, S. A. Transcription increases the cooperativity of ribonucleoprotein assembly. Cell 179, 1370–1381 (2019).
Rodgers, M. L. & Woodson, S. A. A roadmap for rRNA folding and assembly during transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46, 889–901 (2021).
Holmes, K. L. & Culver, G. M. Mapping structural differences between 30S ribosomal subunit assembly intermediates. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 179–186 (2004).
Adilakshmi, T., Bellur, D. L. & Woodson, S. A. Concurrent nucleation of 16S folding and induced fit in 30S ribosome assembly. Nature 455, 1268–1272 (2008).
Clatterbuck Soper, S. F., Dator, R. P., Limbach, P. A. & Woodson, S. A. In vivo X-ray footprinting of pre-30S ribosomes reveals chaperone-dependent remodeling of late assembly intermediates. Mol. Cell 52, 506–516 (2013).
Huang, H. & Karbstein, K. Assembly factors chaperone ribosomal RNA folding by isolating helical junctions that are prone to misfolding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101164118 (2021).
de la Cruz, J., Karbstein, K. & Woolford, J. L. Jr. Functions of ribosomal proteins in assembly of eukaryotic ribosomes in vivo. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 93–129 (2015).
Weitzmann, C., Tumminia, S. J., Boublik, M. & Ofengand, J. A paradigm for local conformational control of function in the ribosome: binding of ribosomal protein S19 to Escherichia coli 16S rRNA in the presence of S7 is required for methylation of m2G966 and blocks methylation of m5C967 by their respective methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 7089–7095 (1991).
Gc, K., Gyawali, P., Balci, H. & Abeysirigunawardena, S. Ribosomal RNA methyltransferase RsmC moonlights as an RNA chaperone. Chembiochem 21, 1885–1892 (2020).
Kiss, A. M., Jady, B. E., Bertrand, E. & Kiss, T. Human box H/ACA pseudouridylation guide RNA machinery. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 5797–5807 (2004).
Bylund, G. O., Lovgren, J. M. & Wikstrom, P. M. Characterization of mutations in the metY-nusA-infB operon that suppress the slow growth of a DeltarimM mutant. J. Bacteriol. 183, 6095–6106 (2001).
Guo, Q. et al. Dissecting the in vivo assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit reveals the role of RimM and general features of the assembly process. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 2609–2620 (2013).
Thurlow, B. et al. Binding properties of YjeQ (RsgA), RbfA, RimM and Era to assembly intermediates of the 30S subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 9918–9932 (2016).
Blomqvist, E. K., Huang, H. & Karbstein, K. A disease associated mutant reveals how Ltv1 orchestrates RP assembly and rRNA folding of the small ribosomal subunit head. PLoS Genet. 19, e1010862 (2023).
Klinge, S. & Woolford, J. L. Jr. Ribosome assembly coming into focus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 116–131 (2019).
Perez-Fernandez, J., Roman, A., De Las Rivas, J., Bustelo, X. R. & Dosil, M. The 90S preribosome is a multimodular structure that is assembled through a hierarchical mechanism. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 5414–5429 (2007).
Cheng, J. et al. 90S pre-ribosome transformation into the primordial 40S subunit. Science 369, 1470–1476 (2020).
Hunziker, M. et al. Conformational switches control early maturation of the eukaryotic small ribosomal subunit. eLife 8, e45185 (2019).
Vanden Broeck, A. & Klinge, S. Eukaryotic ribosome assembly. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 93, 189–210 (2024).
Talkington, M. W., Siuzdak, G. & Williamson, J. R. An assembly landscape for the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature 438, 628–632 (2005).
Hao, Y., Hulscher, R. M., Zinshteyn, B. & Woodson, S. A. Late consolidation of rRNA structure during co-transcriptional assembly in E. coli by time-resolved DMS footprinting. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.10.574868 (2024).
Sheng, K. et al. Domain consolidation in bacterial 50S assembly revealed by anti-sense oligonucleotide probing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.08.593220 (2024).
Sheng, K. et al. Anti-sense oligonucleotide probing as a structural platform for studying ribonucleoprotein complex assembly. Nat. Commun. 16, 6642 (2025).
Rodgers, M. L., O’Brien, B. & Woodson, S. A. Small RNAs and Hfq capture unfolded RNA target sites during transcription. Mol. Cell 83, 1489–1501 (2023).
Hansen, S. R. et al. Multi-step recognition of potential 5′ splice sites by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae U1 snRNP. eLife 11, e70534 (2022).
Bratkovic, T., Bozic, J. & Rogelj, B. Functional diversity of small nucleolar RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 1627–1651 (2020).
Watkins, N. J. & Bohnsack, M. T. The box C/D and H/ACA snoRNPs: key players in the modification, processing and the dynamic folding of ribosomal RNA. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 3, 397–414 (2012).
Song, Z. et al. Mapping snoRNA-target RNA interactions in an RNA-binding protein-dependent manner with chimeric eCLIP. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03508-7 (2025).
Dudnakova, T., Dunn-Davies, H., Peters, R. & Tollervey, D. Mapping targets for small nucleolar RNAs in yeast. Wellcome Open Res. 3, 120 (2018).
Meier, U. T. The daunting task of modifying ribosomal RNA. RNA 28, 1555–1557 (2022).
Henras, A. K. et al. The post-transcriptional steps of eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 65, 2334–2359 (2008).
Khreiss, A., Bohnsack, K. E. & Bohnsack, M. T. Molecular functions of RNA helicases during ribosomal subunit assembly. Biol. Chem. 404, 781–789 (2023).
Sharma, K. & Tollervey, D. Base pairing between U3 small nucleolar RNA and the 5′ end of 18S rRNA is required for pre-rRNA processing. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 6012–6019 (1999).
Kudla, G., Granneman, S., Hahn, D., Beggs, J. D. & Tollervey, D. Cross-linking, ligation, and sequencing of hybrids reveals RNA–RNA interactions in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10010–10015 (2011).
Choudhury, P., Hackert, P., Memet, I., Sloan, K. E. & Bohnsack, M. T. The human RNA helicase DHX37 is required for release of the U3 snoRNP from pre-ribosomal particles. RNA Biol. 16, 54–68 (2019).
Boneberg, F. M. et al. Molecular mechanism of the RNA helicase DHX37 and its activation by UTP14A in ribosome biogenesis. RNA 25, 685–701 (2019).
Sardana, R. et al. The DEAH-box helicase Dhr1 dissociates U3 from the pre-rRNA to promote formation of the central pseudoknot. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002083 (2015).
Hoareau-Aveilla, C., Fayet-Lebaron, E., Jády, B. E., Henras, A. K. & Kiss, T. Utp23p is required for dissociation of snR30 small nucleolar RNP from preribosomal particles. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 3641–3652 (2012).
Morrissey, J. P. & Tollervey, D. Yeast snR30 is a small nucleolar RNA required for 18S rRNA synthesis. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 2469–2477 (1993).
McFadden, E. J. & Baserga, S. J. U8 variants on the brain: a small nucleolar RNA and human disease. RNA Biol. 19, 412–418 (2022).
Peculis, B. A. The sequence of the 5′ end of the U8 small nucleolar RNA is critical for 5.8S and 28S rRNA maturation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3702–3713 (2023).
Jarmoskaite, I. & Russell, R. RNA helicase proteins as chaperones and remodelers. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 697–725 (2014).
Hilbert, M., Karow, A. R. & Klostermeier, D. The mechanism of ATP-dependent RNA unwinding by DEAD box proteins. Biol. Chem. 390, 1237–1250 (2009).
Yang, Q., Del Campo, M., Lambowitz, A. M. & Jankowsky, E. DEAD-box proteins unwind duplexes by local strand separation. Mol. Cell 28, 253–263 (2007).
Mohr, S., Stryker, J. M. & Lambowitz, A. M. A DEAD-box protein functions as an ATP-dependent RNA chaperone in group I intron splicing. Cell 109, 769–779 (2002).
Bhaskaran, H. & Russell, R. Kinetic redistribution of native and misfolded RNAs by a DEAD-box chaperone. Nature 449, 1014–1018 (2007).
Fedorova, O., Solem, A. & Pyle, A. M. Protein-facilitated folding of group II intron ribozymes. J. Mol. Biol. 397, 799–813 (2010).
Karunatilaka, K. S., Solem, A., Pyle, A. M. & Rueda, D. Single-molecule analysis of Mss116-mediated group II intron folding. Nature 467, 935–939 (2010).
Chakrabarti, S., Hyeon, C., Ye, X., Lorimer, G. H. & Thirumalai, D. Molecular chaperones maximize the native state yield on biological times by driving substrates out of equilibrium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10919–E10927 (2017).
Sun, Y. & Woodson, S. A. Disassembly of unstable RNA structures by an E. coli DEAD-box chaperone accelerates ribosome assembly. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf104 (2025).
Cruz, V. E., Weirich, C. S., Peddada, N. & Erzberger, J. P. The DEAD-box ATPase Dbp10/DDX54 initiates peptidyl transferase center formation during 60S ribosome biogenesis. Nat. Commun. 15, 3296 (2024).
Khreiss, A. et al. The DEAD-box protein Dbp6 is an ATPase and RNA annealase interacting with the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) of the ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 744–764 (2023).
Cruz, V. E. et al. Sequence-specific remodeling of a topologically complex RNP substrate by Spb4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 1228–1238 (2022).
Dorner, K. & Hondele, M. The story of RNA unfolded: the molecular function of DEAD- and DExH-box ATPases and their complex relationship with membraneless organelles. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 93, 79–108 (2024).
Aryan, F. et al. Nucleolus activity-dependent recruitment and biomolecular condensation by pH sensing. Mol. Cell 83, 4413–4423 (2023).
Hondele, M. et al. DEAD-box ATPases are global regulators of phase-separated organelles. Nature 573, 144–148 (2019).
Calo, E. et al. RNA helicase DDX21 coordinates transcription and ribosomal RNA processing. Nature 518, 249–253 (2015).
Kim, D. S. et al. Activation of PARP-1 by snoRNAs controls ribosome biogenesis and cell growth via the RNA helicase DDX21. Mol. Cell 75, 1270–1285 (2019).
Shi, X. et al. DDX18 coordinates nucleolus phase separation and nuclear organization to control the pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Commun. 15, 10803 (2024).
Yao, R. W., Luan, P. F. & Chen, L. L. An optimized fixation method containing glyoxal and paraformaldehyde for imaging nuclear bodies. RNA 27, 725–733 (2021).
Schmitz, K. M., Mayer, C., Postepska, A. & Grummt, I. Interaction of noncoding RNA with the rDNA promoter mediates recruitment of DNMT3b and silencing of rRNA genes. Genes Dev. 24, 2264–2269 (2010).
Abraham, K. J. et al. Nucleolar RNA polymerase II drives ribosome biogenesis. Nature 585, 298–302 (2020).
Yin, Q.-F. et al. Long noncoding RNAs with snoRNA ends. Mol. Cell 48, 219–230 (2012).
Yap, K. et al. A short tandem repeat-enriched RNA assembles a nuclear compartment to control alternative splicing and promote cell survival. Mol. Cell 72, 525–540 (2018).
Antifeeva, I. A. et al. Liquid–liquid phase separation as an organizing principle of intracellular space: overview of the evolution of the cell compartmentalization concept. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 79, 251 (2022).
King, M. R. et al. Macromolecular condensation organizes nucleolar sub-phases to set up a pH gradient. Cell 187, 1889–1906 (2024).
Brangwynne, C. P., Mitchison, T. J. & Hyman, A. A. Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4334–4339 (2011).
Weber, S. C. & Brangwynne, C. P. Inverse size scaling of the nucleolus by a concentration-dependent phase transition. Curr. Biol. 25, 641–646 (2015).
Simon, J. R., Carroll, N. J., Rubinstein, M., Chilkoti, A. & López, G. P. Programming molecular self-assembly of intrinsically disordered proteins containing sequences of low complexity. Nat. Chem. 9, 509–515 (2017).
Shav-Tal, Y. et al. Dynamic sorting of nuclear components into distinct nucleolar caps during transcriptional inhibition. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 2395–2413 (2005).
Mitrea, D. M. et al. Nucleophosmin integrates within the nucleolus via multi-modal interactions with proteins displaying R-rich linear motifs and rRNA. eLife 5, e13571 (2016).
Ye, S. et al. Micropolarity governs the structural organization of biomolecular condensates. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 443–451 (2023).
Martin, R. M. et al. Principles of protein targeting to the nucleolus. Nucleus 6, 314–325 (2015).
Rickgauer, J. P., Choi, H., Moore, A. S., Denk, W. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Structural dynamics of human ribosomes in situ reconstructed by exhaustive high-resolution template matching. Mol. Cell 84, 4912–4928 (2024).
Karpinets, T. V., Greenwood, D. J., Sams, C. E. & Ammons, J. T. RNA:protein ratio of the unicellular organism as a characteristic of phosphorous and nitrogen stoichiometry and of the cellular requirement of ribosomes for protein synthesis. BMC Biol. 4, 30 (2006).
Deng, Z. L., Munch, P. C., Mreches, R. & McHardy, A. C. Rapid and accurate identification of ribosomal RNA sequences via deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, e60 (2022).
Reynolds, R. C., Montgomery, P. O. & Hughes, B. Nucleolar “caps” produced by actinomycin D. Cancer Res. 24, 1269–1277 (1964).
Burger, K. et al. Chemotherapeutic drugs inhibit ribosome biogenesis at various levels. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12416–12425 (2010).
Nicolas, E. et al. Involvement of human ribosomal proteins in nucleolar structure and p53-dependent nucleolar stress. Nat. Commun. 7, 11390 (2016).
Wei, J. et al. Multivalent 28S rRNA expansion segments enable reconstitution of multilayered nucleolar architecture. Mol. Cell 86, 1459–477.e9 (2026).
Correll, C. C., Bartek, J. & Dundr, M. The nucleolus: a multiphase condensate balancing ribosome synthesis and translational capacity in health, aging and ribosomopathies. Cells 8, 869 (2019).
Pfister, A. S. An update on nucleolar stress: the transcriptional control of autophagy. Cells https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12162071 (2023).
Watt, K. E. N., Macintosh, J., Bernard, G. & Trainor, P. A. RNA polymerases I and III in development and disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 136, 49–63 (2023).
Hannan, K. M., Sanij, E., Rothblum, L. I., Hannan, R. D. & Pearson, R. B. Dysregulation of RNA polymerase I transcription during disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1829, 342–360 (2013).
Schaefer, E. et al. Autosomal recessive POLR1D mutation with decrease of TCOF1 mRNA is responsible for Treacher Collins syndrome. Genet. Med. 16, 720–724 (2014).
Marszałek-Kruk, B. A. & Wójcicki, P. Identification of three novel TCOF1 mutations in patients with Treacher Collins syndrome. Hum. Genome Var. 8, 36 (2021).
Gál, Z. et al. Hyper-recombination in ribosomal DNA is driven by long-range resection-independent RAD51 accumulation. Nat. Commun. 15, 7797 (2024).
Marszałek-Kruk, B. A., Wójcicki, P., Dowgierd, K. & Śmigiel, R. Treacher Collins syndrome: genetics, clinical features and management. Genes 12, 12091392 (2021).
Luo, M. & Yu, X. NBS1 facilitates preribosomal RNA biogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422029122 (2025).
Dixon, J. et al. Tcof1/Treacle is required for neural crest cell formation and proliferation deficiencies that cause craniofacial abnormalities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13403–13408 (2006).
Putri, I. L., Stephanie, A., Pramanasari, R., Kon, M. & Wungu, C. D. K. The role of genetic factors in microtia: a systematic review. F1000Res. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.111995.3 (2023).
Vincent, M. et al. Treacher Collins syndrome: a clinical and molecular study based on a large series of patients. Genet. Med. 18, 49–56 (2016).
Trainor, P. A., Dixon, J. & Dixon, M. J. Treacher Collins syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and prevention. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 17, 275–283 (2008).
Hori, Y., Shimamoto, A. & Kobayashi, T. The human ribosomal DNA array is composed of highly homogenized tandem clusters. Genome Res. 31, 1971–1982 (2021).
Zecevic, A. et al. WRN helicase promotes repair of DNA double-strand breaks caused by aberrant mismatch repair of chromium-DNA adducts. Cell Cycle 8, 2769–2778 (2009).
Aggarwal, M., Sommers, J. A., Shoemaker, R. H. & Brosh, R. M. Jr. Inhibition of helicase activity by a small molecule impairs Werner syndrome helicase (WRN) function in the cellular response to DNA damage or replication stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1525–1530 (2011).
Grierson, P. M. et al. BLM helicase facilitates RNA polymerase I-mediated ribosomal RNA transcription. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 1172–1183 (2012).
Xue, C. et al. Single-molecule visualization of human BLM helicase as it acts upon double- and single-stranded DNA substrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 11225–11237 (2019).
Shorrocks, A.-M. K. et al. The Bloom syndrome complex senses RPA-coated single-stranded DNA to restart stalled replication forks. Nat. Commun. 12, 585 (2021).
Wang, B. et al. Decoding the pathogenesis of Diamond–Blackfan anemia using single-cell RNA-seq. Cell Discov. 8, 41 (2022).
Warren, A. J. Molecular basis of the human ribosomopathy Shwachman–Diamond syndrome. Adv. Biol. Regul. 67, 109–127 (2018).
Carrascoso-Rubio, C. et al. Generation of dyskeratosis congenita-like hematopoietic stem cells through the stable inhibition of DKC1. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 12, 92 (2021).
Tummala, H. et al. The evolving genetic landscape of telomere biology disorder dyskeratosis congenita. EMBO Mol. Med. 16, 2560–2582 (2024).
Heiss, N. S. et al. X-linked dyskeratosis congenita is caused by mutations in a highly conserved gene with putative nucleolar functions. Nat. Genet. 19, 32–38 (1998).
Ebert, B. L. et al. Identification of RPS14 as a 5q- syndrome gene by RNA interference screen. Nature 451, 335–339 (2008).
Freed, E. F. & Baserga, S. J. The C-terminus of Utp4, mutated in childhood cirrhosis, is essential for ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4798–4806 (2010).
Ellis, S. R. et al. NOL11, implicated in the pathogenesis of North American Indian childhood cirrhosis, is required for pre-rRNA transcription and processing. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002892 (2012).
Badrock, A. P. et al. Analysis of U8 snoRNA variants in zebrafish reveals how bi-allelic variants cause leukoencephalopathy with calcifications and cysts. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 106, 694–706 (2020).
Ridanpaa, M. et al. Mutations in the RNA component of RNase MRP cause a pleiotropic human disease, cartilage–hair hypoplasia. Cell 104, 195–203 (2001).
Hermanns, P. et al. Consequences of mutations in the non-coding RMRP RNA in cartilage–hair hypoplasia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 3723–3740 (2005).
Robertson, N. et al. A disease-linked lncRNA mutation in RNase MRP inhibits ribosome synthesis. Nat. Commun. 13, 649 (2022).
Goldfarb, K. C. & Cech, T. R. Targeted CRISPR disruption reveals a role for RNase MRP RNA in human preribosomal RNA processing. Genes Dev. 31, 59–71 (2017).
Mensah, M. A. et al. Aberrant phase separation and nucleolar dysfunction in rare genetic diseases. Nature 614, 564–571 (2023).
Kwon, I. et al. Poly-dipeptides encoded by the C9orf72 repeats bind nucleoli, impede RNA biogenesis, and kill cells. Science 345, 1139–1145 (2014).
Lee, K. H. et al. C9orf72 dipeptide repeats impair the assembly, dynamics, and function of membrane-less organelles. Cell 167, 774–788 (2016).
White, M. R. et al. C9orf72 poly(PR) dipeptide repeats disturb biomolecular phase separation and disrupt nucleolar function. Mol. Cell 74, 713–728 (2019).
Solomon, D. A., Smikle, R., Reid, M. J. & Mizielinska, S. Altered phase separation and cellular impact in C9orf72-linked ALS/FTD. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15, 664151 (2021).
Radwan, M. et al. Arginine in C9ORF72 dipolypeptides mediates promiscuous proteome binding and multiple modes of toxicity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 19, 640–654 (2020).
Murai, N., Murakami, Y., Tajima, A. & Matsufuji, S. Novel ubiquitin-independent nucleolar c-Myc degradation pathway mediated by antizyme 2. Sci. Rep. 8, 3005 (2018).
Liao, H., Gaur, A., Mauvais, C., Denicourt, C. & Wolin, S. p53 induces a survival transcriptional response after nucleolar stress. Mol. Biol. Cell https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E21-05-0251 (2021).
Kasselimi, E., Pefani, D.-E., Taraviras, S. & Lygerou, Z. Ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus at the heart of aging. Trends Biochem. Sci. 47, 328–341 (2022).
Tiku, V. et al. Small nucleoli are a cellular hallmark of longevity. Nat. Commun. 8, 16083 (2017).
Montanaro, L., Trere, D. & Derenzini, M. Nucleolus, ribosomes, and cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 173, 301–310 (2008).
Hannan, K. M. et al. Nuclear stabilization of p53 requires a functional nucleolar surveillance pathway. Cell Rep. 41, 111571 (2022).
Fumagalli, S. & Thomas, G. The role of p53 in ribosomopathies. Semin. Hematol. 48, 97–105 (2011).
Lindstrom, M. S., Bartek, J. & Maya-Mendoza, A. p53 at the crossroad of DNA replication and ribosome biogenesis stress pathways. Cell Death Differ. 29, 972–982 (2022).
Zhang, W. et al. Recapitulating and reversing human brain ribosomopathy defects via the maladaptive integrated stress response. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk1034 (2024).
Tiu, G. C. et al. A p53-dependent translational program directs tissue-selective phenotypes in a model of ribosomopathies. Dev. Cell 56, 2089–2102 (2021).
Lamaye, F., Galliot, S., Alibardi, L., Lafontaine, D. L. & Thiry, M. Nucleolar structure across evolution: the transition between bi- and tri-compartmentalized nucleoli lies within the class Reptilia. J. Struct. Biol. 174, 352–359 (2011).
Thiry, M., Lamaye, F. & Lafontaine, D. L. The nucleolus: when 2 became 3. Nucleus 2, 289–293 (2011).
Thiry, M., Schoonbroodt, S. & Goessens, G. Cytochemical distinction of various nucleolar components in insect cells. Biol. Cell 72, 133–140 (1991).
Thiry, M., Ploton, D., Menager, M. & Goessens, G. Ultrastructural distribution of DNA within the nucleolus of various animal cell lines or tissues revealed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. Cell Tissue Res. 271, 33–45 (1993).
Thiry, M. & Poncin, P. Morphological changes of the nucleolus during oogenesis in oviparous teleost fish, Barbus barbus (L). J. Struct. Biol. 152, 1–13 (2005).
Alvarez, M. et al. Ultrastructural changes of the carp (Cyprinus carpio) hepatocyte nucleolus during seasonal acclimatization. Biol. Cell 98, 457–463 (2012).
Zhu, Q. et al. Rcl1 depletion impairs 18S pre-rRNA processing at the A1-site and up-regulates a cohort of ribosome biogenesis genes in zebrafish. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 5743–5759 (2021).
Ramachandran, S. et al. The shift from early to late types of ribosomes in zebrafish development involves changes at a subset of rRNA 2′-O-Me sites. RNA 26, 1919–1934 (2020).
Goodfellow, S. J. & Zomerdijk, J. C. B. M. in Epigenetics: Development and Disease Subcellular Biochemistry Ch. 10, 211–236 (Springer, 2013).
Mayer, C., Schmitz, K.-M., Li, J., Grummt, I. & Santoro, R. Intergenic transcripts regulate the epigenetic state of rRNA genes. Mol. Cell 22, 351–361 (2006).
Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376, 44–53 (2022).
Parks, M. M. et al. Variant ribosomal RNA alleles are conserved and exhibit tissue-specific expression. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao0665 (2018).
Liu, J. et al. The complete telomere-to-telomere sequence of a mouse genome. Science 386, 1141–1146 (2024).
Valdez, B. C., Henning, D., So, R. B., Dixon, J. & Dixon, M. J. The Treacher Collins syndrome (TCOF1) gene product is involved in ribosomal DNA gene transcription by interacting with upstream binding factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10709–10714 (2004).
Munoz-Velasco, I., Herrera-Escamilla, A. K. & Vazquez-Salazar, A. Nucleolar origins: challenging perspectives on evolution and function. Open Biol. 15, 240330 (2025).
Mitrea, D. M. et al. Methods for physical characterization of phase-separated bodies and membrane-less organelles. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 4773–4805 (2018).
Ide, S., Imai, R., Ochi, H. & Maeshima, K. Transcriptional suppression of ribosomal DNA with phase separation. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb5953 (2020).
Shan, L., Li, P., Yu, H. & Chen, L.-L. Emerging roles of nuclear bodies in genome spatial organization. Trends Cell Biol. 34, 595–605 (2024).
Jao, C. Y. & Salic, A. Exploring RNA transcription and turnover in vivo by using click chemistry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15779–15784 (2008).
Bao, X. et al. Capturing the interactome of newly transcribed RNA. Nat. Methods 15, 213–220 (2018).
Walavalkar, K. et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nucleolus interactions captured by nucleolar laser microdissection (NoLMseq). Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66294-7 (2025).
Syrchina, M. S., Shakhov, A. M., Aybush, A. V., Zalessky, A. D. & Nadtochenko, V. A. Revealing nucleoplasm mechanics by optical trapping and Brownian motion of nucleolus within mouse GV-oocytes in vivo. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1695/1/012052 (2020).
Tan, P. et al. Optical control of protein delivery and partitioning in the nucleolus. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, e69 (2022).
Syrchina, M. S., Shakhov, A. M., Aybush, A. V. & Nadtochenko, V. A. Optical trapping of nucleolus reveals viscoelastic properties of nucleoplasm inside mouse germinal vesicle oocytes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.19.999342 (2020).
Mitra, A. et al. Acute chromatin decompaction stiffens the nucleus as revealed by nanopillar-induced nuclear deformation in cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2416659122 (2025).
Zhuang, Y. et al. Coaching ribosome biogenesis from the nuclear periphery. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.21.597078 (2024).
Antonacci, G. & Braakman, S. Biomechanics of subcellular structures by non-invasive Brillouin microscopy. Sci. Rep. 6, 37217 (2016).
Zorbas, C., Soenmez, A., Leger, J., De Vleeschouwer, C. & Lafontaine, D. L. Detecting material state changes in the nucleolus by label-free digital holographic microscopy. EMBO Rep. 25, 2786–2811 (2024).
Kilgore, H. R. et al. Protein codes promote selective subcellular compartmentalization. Science 387, 1095–1101 (2025).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Y.-H. Pan and M.-L. Hou for critical reading of our manuscript. This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (no. XDB0570000) and the National Key R&D Program of China (no. 2021YFA1100203). This work has been supported by the New Cornerstone Science Foundation through the New Cornerstone Investigator Program and the Ruisi Research Center for Life Science, Minhang District, Shanghai. L.-L.C. is also a Shanghai Academy of Natural Sciences Senior Investigator.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology thanks Denis Lafontaine, Vikram Panse and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Related links
Human protein atlas: www.proteinatlas.org
Glossary
- 01 site
-
A specific pre-rRNA processing site within the 5′ ETS, where endonucleolytic cleavage occurs during early ribosome biogenesis. According to this nomenclature, labels such as 01, A0 and 1 mark distinct cleavage positions along the pre-rRNA, whereas terms such as 01–A0 denote the spacer fragment bounded by those two sites.
- DEAD-box RNA-dependent ATPases
-
A conserved family of ATP-hydrolysing enzymes that unwind RNA duplexes and modulate RNA–protein condensates. In the nucleolus, they coordinate pre-rRNA remodelling.
- Intrinsically disordered regions
-
(IDRs) Flexible, low-complexity protein domains lacking fixed tertiary structure. In nucleolar proteins, IDRs mediate multivalent RNA interactions and facilitate condensate formation and microrheological properties.
- Micropolarity
-
Local polarity within the nucleolus, reflecting the physicochemical properties of the immediate molecular environment surrounding nucleolar components or polarity-sensitive probes.
- Microviscosity
-
The effective local viscosity within the nucleolus, representing the resistance experienced by molecules as they diffuse, rotate or rearrange within nucleolar compartments.
- Pre-rRNA processing
-
Hierarchical maturation of primary rRNA transcripts through site-specific cleavages, modifications and folding to yield the 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNAs. Maturation is coupled with ribosomal-subunit assembly.
- Ribosomopathies
-
A group of congenital or acquired disorders caused by defects in ribosome biogenesis or function. These diseases often present with tissue-specific pathologies linked to nucleolar dysfunction.
- Super-resolution microscopy
-
(SRM) Optical imaging techniques (for example, structured illumination microscopy, stimulated emission depletion microscopy, and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy) that surpass the diffraction limit of visible light to reveal nanoscale nucleolar architecture and molecule distributions.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shan, L., Sun, Y., Woodson, S.A. et al. Elucidating structure–function relationships in the mammalian nucleolus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-026-00975-z
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-026-00975-z


