Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical Outlook
  • Published:

Implementation of the 2024 revision of the McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis

The 2024 revision of the McDonald criteria for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis marks a substantial departure from previous iterations, establishing a unified framework that integrates presentation, lesion topography and a flexible combination of paraclinical tools. This Clinical Outlook considers the major changes and their clinical implementation, and the implications of the new criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Approach to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) with the 2024 revision of the McDonald criteria.

References

  1. Montalban, X. et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2024 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00270-4 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brownlee, W. J. et al. Towards a unified set of diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 97, 571–582 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhlmann, T. et al. Multiple sclerosis progression: time for a new mechanism-driven framework. Lancet Neurol. 22, 78–88 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petracca, M. et al. Brain reserve and timing of clinical onset in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 30, 1290–1295 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vidal-Jordana, A., Sastre-Garriga, J., Tintoré, M., Rovira, À. & Montalban, X. Optic nerve topography in multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: existing knowledge and future directions. Mult. Scler. 30, 139–149 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hegen, H. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid kappa free light chains for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement. Mult. Scler. 29, 182–195 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borrelli, S. et al. Central vein sign, cortical lesions, and paramagnetic rim lesions for the diagnostic and prognostic workup of multiple sclerosis. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 11, e200253 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Martire, M. S., Moiola, L., Rocca, M. A., Filippi, M. & Absinta, M. What is the potential of paramagnetic rim lesions as diagnostic indicators in multiple sclerosis? Expert Rev. Neurother. 22, 829–837 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cagol, A. et al. Diagnostic performance of cortical lesions and the central vein sign in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 81, 143–153 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cobo-Calvo, A. et al. Association of very early treatment initiation with the risk of long-term disability in patients with a first demyelinating event. Neurology 101, e1280–e1292 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.M. has received research grants from Ministero Università e Ricerca - Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza Extended Partnerships (MNESYS No. PE00000006 and DHEAL-COM No. PNC-E3- 2022–23683267) and Campania Region NeuroDiaTE Project (CUP E65E24002260002); and is editorial board member of Neurology and Multiple Sclerosis Journal. O.C. has a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Research Professorship (RP-2017-08-ST2-004); is Deputy Editor of Neurology, for which she receives an honorarium; and has received research grant support from the MS Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the National MS Society, the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, the NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and the Rosetree Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Moccia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.M. has received honoraria from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS Celgene, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme. O.C. is a member of an independent data and safety monitoring board for Novartis; has given a teaching talk in a local symposium for Merck; and has contributed to an advisory board for Biogen. A.T. declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moccia, M., Ciccarelli, O. & Thompson, A. Implementation of the 2024 revision of the McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 21, 664–666 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01141-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01141-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research