Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

The importance of trait selection in ecology

Nature volume 618, pages E29–E30 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Matters Arising to this article was published on 28 June 2023

The Original Article was published on 29 September 2021

arising from C. P. Carmona et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03871-y (2021)

Two recent publications1,2 have explored the importance of roots for understanding plant form and function, but reached opposite conclusions on the basis of largely overlapping data. Carmona et al.1 concluded that their results “do not confirm the strong covariation between leaf and fine-root traits predicted by the plant economics spectrum hypothesis”. By contrast, Weigelt et al.2 concluded that “key leaf and fine-root traits were aligned along the expected [fast–slow] ‘conservation’ gradient of plant economic investment”. Here we reflect on the causes for the apparent discrepancies of these studies and show that the rationale behind trait selection is vital for the conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: PCA of the 301 species analysed in Carmona et al.1 using differing trait subsets and no varimax rotation.

Data availability

The data to reproduce Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1 are available according to the statement in Carmona et al.1 in the Figshare repository: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13140146.

References

  1. Carmona, C. P. et al. Fine-root traits in the global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 597, 683–687 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weigelt, A. et al. An integrated framework of plant form and function: the belowground perspective. New Phytol. 232, 42–59 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reich, P. B. The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J. Ecol. 102, 275–301 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Körner, C. Growth controls photosynthesis—mostly. Nova Acta Leopold. 114, 273–283 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Z. et al. Divergent nitrogen and phosphorus allocation strategies in terrestrial plant leaves and fine roots: a global meta‐analysis. J. Ecol. 110, 2745–2758 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Díaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCormack, M. L. et al. Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol. 207, 505–518 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jolliffe, I. T. & Cadima, J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150202 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Acal, C., Aguilera, A. M. & Escabias, M. New modeling approaches based on varimax rotation of functional principal components. Mathematics 8, 2085 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergmann, J. et al. The fungal collaboration gradient dominates the root economics space in plants. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba3756 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Laughlin, D. C. et al. Root traits explain plant species distributions along climatic gradients yet challenge the nature of ecological trade-offs. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1123–1134 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Freschet, G. T. et al. Root traits as drivers of plant and ecosystem functioning: current understanding, pitfalls and future research needs. New Phytol. 232, 1123–1158 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vleminckx, J. et al. Resolving whole‐plant economics from leaf, stem and root traits of 1467 Amazonian tree species. Oikos 130, 1193–1208 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Alexandra Weigelt, Liesje Mommer

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany

    Alexandra Weigelt, Karl Andraczek & Fons van der Plas

  2. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Alexandra Weigelt, Helge Bruelheide, Jens Kattge & Francesco Maria Sabatini

  3. Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands

    Liesje Mommer, Fons van der Plas & Jasper van Ruijven

  4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Climate Change Science Institute and Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    Colleen M. Iversen

  5. Sustainable Grassland Systems, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Paulinenaue, Germany

    Joana Bergmann

  6. Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

    Helge Bruelheide & Francesco Maria Sabatini

  7. Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station (SETE), National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Moulis, France

    Grégoire T. Freschet

  8. Biodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Nathaly R. Guerrero-Ramírez

  9. Functional Biogeography, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany

    Jens Kattge

  10. Soil Biology Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands

    Thom W. Kuyper

  11. Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA

    Daniel C. Laughlin

  12. Functional Forest Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Hamburg, Barsbüttel-Willinghusen, Germany

    Ina C. Meier

  13. Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

    Hendrik Poorter

  14. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia

    Hendrik Poorter

  15. CEFE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France

    Catherine Roumet

  16. Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Francesco Maria Sabatini

  17. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Marina Semchenko & Christopher J. Sweeney

  18. Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Marina Semchenko

  19. Jealott’s Hill International Research Centre, Syngenta, Bracknell, UK

    Christopher J. Sweeney

  20. Institute of Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA

    Oscar J. Valverde-Barrantes

  21. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Bioenergy Innovation and Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    Larry M. York

  22. The Root Lab, Center for Tree Science, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, USA

    M. Luke McCormack

Authors
  1. Alexandra Weigelt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liesje Mommer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karl Andraczek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Colleen M. Iversen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joana Bergmann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Helge Bruelheide
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Grégoire T. Freschet
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nathaly R. Guerrero-Ramírez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jens Kattge
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Thom W. Kuyper
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Daniel C. Laughlin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ina C. Meier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Fons van der Plas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hendrik Poorter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Catherine Roumet
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jasper van Ruijven
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Francesco Maria Sabatini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Marina Semchenko
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Christopher J. Sweeney
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Oscar J. Valverde-Barrantes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Larry M. York
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  22. M. Luke McCormack
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.W., L.M., K.A., C.M.I., J.B., H.B., G.T.F., N.R.G.-R., J.K., T.W.K., D.C.L., I.C.M., F.v.d.P., H.P., C.R., J.v.R., F.M.S., M.S., C.J.S., O.J.V.-B., L.M.Y. and M.L.M. discussed the results and contributed to the text. K.A. produced the figure.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Weigelt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Analysis of the complete dataset (301 species) with full information for all traits based on species mean trait data.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weigelt, A., Mommer, L., Andraczek, K. et al. The importance of trait selection in ecology. Nature 618, E29–E30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06148-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06148-8

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing