Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Haploid facultative parthenogenesis in sunflower sexual reproduction

Abstract

Flowering plant sexual reproduction requires double fertilization, yielding embryo and endosperm seed compartments: the latter supports embryo growth and seed germination. In an experiment to generate haploid embryos through inhibition of pollen phospholipase activity in sunflower (Helianthus annus), we serendipitously discovered that emasculated sunflowers spontaneously form parthenogenic haploid seed. Exploration of genetic, chemical and environmental factors demonstrated that a specific genotype background enabled high parthenogenesis and that full spectrum high-intensity light supplementation boosted parthenogenesis, yielding hundreds of haploid seeds per head. Induction of doubled haploid plants can greatly accelerate plant breeding efficiency; however, despite successful engineering of haploid induction in many crops, few reported systems are commercially scalable1. Here we report efficient methods of chemical emasculation and genome doubling to produce fertile plants and enable a scalable sunflower doubled haploid system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Latent parthenogenesis leads to haploid induction in sunflower.
Fig. 2: Parthenogenesis is associated with nuclear genetic factors in germplasm related to SY58.
Fig. 3: Environmental treatments to enhance haploid seed production in a sunflower CMS line.
Fig. 4: Parthenogenic haploid seed germination, in vitro culture, chromosome doubling and the complete doubled haploid process.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available within this article and its Supplementary Information. Source data for Fig. 2a can be found in Supplementary Table 2.

References

  1. Jacquier, N. M. A. et al. Puzzling out plant reproduction by haploid induction for innovations in plant breeding. Nat. Plants 6, 610–619 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujita, M. K., Singhal, S., Brunes, T. O. & Maldonado, J. A. Evolutionary dynamics and consequences of parthenogenesis in vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 51, 191–214 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Darwin, C. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species (D. Appleton, 1897).

  4. Hojsgaard, D. & Hörandl, E. The rise of apomixis in natural plant populations. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 436713 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Majeský, Ľ., Vašut, R. J., Kitner, M. & Trávníček, B. The pattern of genetic variability in apomictic clones of Taraxacum officinale indicates the alternation of asexual and sexual histories of apomicts. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041868 (2012).

  6. Khanday, I., Skinner, D., Yang, B., Mercier, R. & Sundaresan, V. A male-expressed rice embryogenic trigger redirected for asexual propagation through seeds. Nature 565, 91–95 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Underwood, C. J. et al. A PARTHENOGENESIS allele from apomictic dandelion can induce egg cell division without fertilization in lettuce. Nat. Genet. 54, 84–93 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu, J. et al. Integration of genomic selection with doubled-haploid evaluation in hybrid breeding: from GS 1.0 to GS 4.0 and beyond. Mol. Plant 15, 577–580 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelliher, T. et al. MATRILINEAL, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction. Nature 542, 105–109 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, C. et al. A 4-bp insertion at ZmPLA1 encoding a putative phospholipase A generates haploid induction in maize. Mol. Plant 10, 520–522 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilles, L. M. et al. Loss of pollen‐specific phospholipase NOT LIKE DAD triggers gynogenesis in maize. EMBO J. 36, 707–717 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaikam, V. et al. Analysis of effectiveness of R1-nj anthocyanin marker for in vivo haploid identification in maize and molecular markers for predicting the inhibition of R1-nj expression. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 159–171 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sunflowerseed Explorer. USDA Foreign Agriculture Service https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/cropview/commodityView.aspx?cropid=2224000 (2024).

  14. Jiang, C. et al. A reactive oxygen species burst causes haploid induction in maize. Mol. Plant 15, 943–955 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leclercq, P. Une stérilité mâle cytoplasmique chez le Tournesol. In Annales de l’Amélioration des Plantes (ĽInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 1969).

  16. Bracey, M. H., Hanson, M. A., Masuda, K. R., Stevens, R. C. & Cravatt, B. F. Structural adaptations in a membrane enzyme that terminates endocannabinoid signaling. Science 298, 1793–1796 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Newcomb, W. The development of the embryo sac of sunflower Helianthus annuus after fertilization. Can. J. Bot. 51, 879–890 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, J. & Fick, G. Adaptation of reciprocal full‐sib selection in sunflower breeding using gibberellic acid induced male sterility 1. Crop Sci. 18, 161–162 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, H., Hou, H., Jan, C. C. & Chao, W. S. Irradiated pollen-induced oarthenogenesis for doubled haploid oroduction in sunflowers (Helianthus spp.). Plants 12, 2430 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Laurie, D. & Bennett, M. Early post-pollination events in hexaploid wheat × maize crosses. Sexual Plant Reprod. 3, 70–76 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patial, M., Pal, D., Thakur, A., Bana, R. S. & Patial, S. Doubled haploidy techniques in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): an overview. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 27–41 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dordas, C. Foliar boron application improves seed set, seed yield, and seed quality of alfalfa. Agron. J. 98, 907–913 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xin, P., Li, B., Zhang, H. & Hu, J. Optimization and control of the light environment for greenhouse crop production. Sci. Rep. 9, 8650 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rieu, I., Twell, D. & Firon, N. Pollen development at high temperature: from acclimation to collapse. Plant Physiol. 173, 1967–1976 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cashmore, A. R., Jarillo, J. A., Wu, Y.-J. & Liu, D. Cryptochromes: blue light receptors for plants and animals. Science 284, 760–765 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Melchinger, A. E., Molenaar, W. S., Mirdita, V. & Schipprack, W. Colchicine alternatives for chromosome doubling in maize haploids for doubled‐haploid production. Crop Sci. 56, 559–569 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Blakeslee, A. F. & Avery, A. G. Methods of inducing doubling of chromosomes in plants: by treatment with colchicine. J. Hered. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104294 (1937).

  28. Hardham, A. & Gunning, B. Structure of cortical microtubule arrays in plant cells. J. Cell Biol. 77, 14–34 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Manzoor, A., Ahmad, T., Bashir, M. A., Hafiz, I. A. & Silvestri, C. Studies on colchicine induced chromosome doubling for enhancement of quality traits in ornamental plants. Plants 8, 194 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Verdeil, J.-L., Alemanno, L., Niemenak, N. & Tranbarger, T. J. Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends Plant Sci. 12, 245–252 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu, J.-K. Advanced breeding technologies for accelerating genetic gain. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 8, 203–210 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yao, L. et al. OsMATL mutation induces haploid seed formation in indica rice. Nat. Plants 4, 530–533 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lv, J. et al. Generation of paternal haploids in wheat by genome editing of the centromeric histone CENH3. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1397–1401 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, N., Gent, J. I. & Dawe, R. K. Haploid induction by a maize cenh3 null mutant. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe2299 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhong, Y. et al. In vivo maternal haploid induction in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 250–252 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rao, K. S. & Rohini, V. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): a simple protocol. Ann. Bot. 83, 347–354 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Qu, Y. et al. Mapping of QTL for kernel abortion caused by in vivo haploid induction in maize (Zea mays L.). PLoS ONE 15, e0228411 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Shen, K., Qu, M. & Zhao, P. The roads to haploid embryogenesis. Plants 12, 243 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lv, J. & Kelliher, T. Recent advances in engineering of in vivo haploid induction systems. Methods Mol. Biol. 2653, 365–383 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferrie, A. & Caswell, K. Isolated microspore culture techniques and recent progress for haploid and doubled haploid plant production. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 104, 301–309 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Todorova, M., Ivanov, P., Shindrova, P., Christov, M. & Ivanova, I. Doubled haploid production of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) through irradiated pollen-induced parthenogenesis. Euphytica 97, 249–254 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Davis, G. L. The life history of Podolepis jaceoides (Sims) Voss-II. Megasporogenesis, female gametophyte and embryogeny. Phytomorphology 11, 206–219 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cyprys, P., Lindemeier, M. & Sprunck, S. Gamete fusion is facilitated by two sperm cell-expressed DUF679 membrane proteins. Nat. Plants 5, 253–257 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kallamadi, P. R. & Mulpuri, S. Ploidy analysis of Helianthus species by flow cytometry and its use in hybridity confirmation. Nucleus 59, 123–130 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Garcés, R. et al. Characterization of sunflower seed and oil wax ester composition by GC/MS, a final evaluation. LWT 173, 114365 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Rossum, G. & Drake, F. L. Python 3 Reference Manual (CreateSpace, 2009).

  47. Silverman, B. W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (Routledge, 2018).

  48. Duncan, K. E., Czymmek, K. J., Jiang, N., Thies, A. C. & Topp, C. N. X-ray microscopy enables multiscale high-resolution 3D imaging of plant cells, tissues, and organs. Plant Physiol. 188, 831–845 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Deng, J. et al. Concept and methodology of characterising infrared radiative performance of urban trees using tree crown spectroscopy. Build. Environ. 157, 380–390 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Aznar‐Moreno, J. A. et al. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) long‐chain acyl‐coenzyme A synthetases expressed at high levels in developing seeds. Physiol. Plant. 150, 363–373 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Marion, B. Lise, P. Joel and Y. Ma for whole-genome 33-SNP-maker analysis; J. Comadran Trabal and R. Sensolini for genetic distance check; J. Fabish for statistical support; W. Huang from the China Agriculture University and B. Ma for technical support; Y. Gao and F. Zhu for pipeline supports; V. Walbot for manuscript editing and consultation; A. Brosnan and M. Zong for ploidy analysis support; W. Shi and Y. Song from Zeiss for microcomputed tomography analysis; S. Tian and S. Ni for confocal microscopy studies; A. Bharti, A. Farmer and J. Curley for SY58 genome sequencing; E. Cheek for lighting infrastructure support; the Duke University Phytatron team, M. Betts, G. Piotrowski, A. Eddings and T. Smith; X. Zhang, B. Zhang, X. Chen, I. Jepson, C. Baxter, E. Dunder, R. Egger, J.-C. Rousseaux, C. Zuo, F. Kong, J. Zhang and O. Sauvageot for project guidance and support; B. Bao, Y. He, L. Li and M. Lopez-Sendon for sunflower lines; and C. Leming and M. Bublitz for intellectual property guidance. Syngenta Crop Protection provided internal funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.L., D.L. and T.K. conceptualized the study. E.B. developed the emasculation method. V.M.T., D.S., P.W., X.C. and J.C. conducted the phenotyping trials in field locations. H.J., H.D. and E.B. undertook greenhouse plant care and phenotyping. B.C., P.W. and Z.L. conceptualized and performed the light treatments. Y.D., Changbao Li, Chao Li, R.C. and P.D. performed the tissue culture and genome doubling. C.P., A.T. and P.D. performed the marker analysis and fingerprinting. X.T. and J.L. performed the microscopy. B.S. and W.C. performed the seed lipid profile check. F.B. and V.M.T. provided guidance and methodological considerations. J.L. and T.K. wrote the original draft of the manuscript, and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jian Lv or Timothy Kelliher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.L., D.L., T.K., E.B., Changbao Li, Y.D., F.B., V.M.T., C.P. and P.D. have filed the patent application PCT/CN2024/090146, which covers the haploid parthenogenesis phenomenon, information on germplasm testing, doubling methods, in-medium seed culture processes to enhance germination, and environmental response of haploid seed setting. Assignees of PCT/CN2024/090146 are Syngenta Group Co., Ltd and Syngenta Crop Protection AG. The status of the application is not yet published. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Loren Rieseberg, Charles Underwood and Thomas Widiez for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Biology and seed phenotypes of corn and sunflower haploids.

a, Typical corn colorless haploid and diploid embryos (center) dissected from haploid-induced ears (left) expressing purple anthocyanin pigment from transmission of the R1-nj marker in sperm. Haploid embryos are selected, genome-doubled, and cultured into DH plantlets (right). b, Disc floret from SY54 and SY54_CMS, after removing corolla. Anthers from SY54_CMS are shorter and not able to produce pollen, due to the CMS. c, Developing parthenogenic embryo in a SY54_CMS ovary ~20 days post-anthesis. d, An ovary from the same head lacking a parthenogenic embryo. Evidence of autonomous endosperm is not found in either image. e, SY54 (diploid) self-pollinated embryo with cellularized endosperm ~15 days post-anthesis. Results in c to e are representative of four to six replicate images of each. f, Normal diploid embryos from SY58 at 22 days post-anthesis. g, Normal diploid embryo from SY58 excised from the seed coat at 16 d post-anthesis. Two cotyledons are marked (^). h and i, Parthenogenic haploid embryos from SY58_CMS at 22 days post-anthesis. j and k, Transverse micro-computed tomography (microCT) sections of mature parthenogenic haploid (j) and normally fertilized diploid (k) seed from a SY54_CMS head. Subsets, green horizontal line identified the position of the section in the seed. l, Germplasm test in Toulouse field in 2021. SY54-CMS heads bagged as they start to flower. m, Close up image of the flowering stage with the outermost rings at pollination stage, surrounding the inner rings of immature flowers. n, Bagging and crossing plants in the field. PI, Propidium iodide stain; UV auto, autofluorescence visualized using UV light excitation (405 nm).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Parent emasculation and treatment to induce parthenogenic haploids.

a, R1 stage for GA3 treatment. b, R1 stage bud just following GA3 application. c, GA3-sterilized SY58 head showing absence of anther exertion and pollen shed. d, Parthenogenesis stimulation test (with maize pollen and other AIs treatment) with SY54_CMS sunflower head adding ZM01 maize pollen (e) painted onto the SY54 stigmas (f). g, Hormone was injected into the spongy layer of sunflower head (green arrow). h, Germination of SY58_CMS derived haploids in soil. Two hundred seeds yielded 80 seedings, of which roughly half were normal looking. i, and half were abnormal (j, k).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Parthenogenic haploid germination and doubling.

a-c, Impact of semi-solid formulation on tissue penetrance, effective treatment duration, and plant vigor. a, Liquid control formulation with DMSO and fluorescein showing some leaf penetration at 4 h but no penetration into the meristem (red circle). b, Semi-solid formulation with DMSO and fluorescein, showing deep tissue penetration at 5 h, and full saturation of the meristem region at 48 h (red circle). c, Liquid formulation with colchicine. d, Semi-solid formulation with colchicine, showing reduction of leaf growth compared to (c). This indicates that the colchicine is having a greater impact (limiting) growth in the semi-solid treatment. e and f, Growth of colchicine-induced doubled haploid plants (e) and leaves (f) derived from germinated parthenogenic haploid seeds. g, Spontaneous doubled haploids among parthenogenic (PRG) haploid progenies. Out of thirty-nine viable plants derived from the planting of 200 haploid seed, four appeared larger and scored as diploids in the ploidy analysis (flow cytometry) data. h, Sunflower parthenogenic doubled haploid (DH) process. Left, plants are emasculated manually or with a GA3 treatment. Center, seeds are separated using a blower and germinated in soil (bottom) or in tissue culture (top); a doubling treatment is provided to produce DH plants (right).

Extended Data Table 1 Total F1 (hybrid) seeds and haploid seeds recovered from MLnFP-treated pollen and control
Extended Data Table 2 Parthenogenic haploid yields from two lines (SY54 and SY15), induced by pollination block provided in two ways: 1) through use of the CMS (cytoplasmic male sterile) system, and 2) by hand emasculation (removal of anthers during flowering)
Extended Data Table 3 Embryo regeneration stimulation testing on SY54_CMS sunflower heads, using plant hormones, four different sources of maize pollen, or a combination
Extended Data Table 4 Supplementation of field-grown sunflowers with maize pollen and boron application, at two planting densities (15,000 and 25,000 plants / acre) for the two parthenogenic lines, SY58_CMS and SY54_CMS
Extended Data Table 5 Three lines that did not produce parthenogenic haploids in the France field trial were grown in the Duke University chamber with high light intensity and daylength
Extended Data Table 6 In-soil germination and in-medium germination of parthenogenic seeds
Extended Data Table 7 Comparison of the frequency of genome doubling methods

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and Supplementary Tables 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, J., Liang, D., Bumann, E. et al. Haploid facultative parthenogenesis in sunflower sexual reproduction. Nature 641, 732–739 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08798-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08798-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing