Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A movable long-term implantable soft microfibre for dynamic bioelectronics

Abstract

Long-term implantable bioelectronics offer a powerful means to evaluate the function of the nervous system and serve as effective human–machine interfaces1,2,3. Here, inspired by earthworms, we introduce NeuroWorm—a soft, stretchable and movable fibre sensor designed for bioelectronic interface. Our approach involves rolling to transform 2D bioelectronic devices into 1D NeuroWorm, creating a multifunctional microfibre that houses longitudinally distributed electrode arrays for both bioelectrical and biomechanical monitoring. NeuroWorm effectively records high-quality spatio-temporal signals in situ while steerably advancing within the brain or on the muscle as needed. This allows for the dynamic targeting and shifting of desired monitoring sites. Implanted in muscle through a tiny incision, NeuroWorm provides stable bioelectrical monitoring in rats for more than 43 weeks. Even after 54 weeks of implantation in muscle, fibroblast encapsulation around the fibre remains negligible. Our NeuroWorm represents a platform that promotes a substantial advance in bioelectronics—from an immobile probe fixed in place to active, intelligent and living devices for long-term, minimally invasive and mobile evaluation of the nervous system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Fig. 1: Design, fabrication strategy and demonstrations of NeuroWorm.
Fig. 2: Properties of NeuroWorm.
Fig. 3: Dynamic interrogation of brain and subcutaneous fascia by NeuroWorm under magnetic field control.
Fig. 4: Long-term implantable monitoring of electrophysiological and mechanical signals in peripheral muscle using the NeuroWorm system.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw data and scripts for plotting some of the Extended Data Figures are available in a figshare public repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29389763). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The scripts for plotting some of the Extended Data Figures are publicly available in the figshare public repository and the Supplementary Information. Also, this study does not involve genomic or protein structure data.

References

  1. Zhao, S. et al. Tracking neural activity from the same cells during the entire adult life of mice. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 696–710 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Song, E., Li, J., Won, S. M., Bai, W. & Rogers, J. A. Materials for flexible bioelectronic systems as chronic neural interfaces. Nat. Mater. 19, 590–603 (2020).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Mastinu, E., Sassu, P., Aszmann, O. & Branemark, R. Self-contained neuromusculoskeletal arm prostheses. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1732–1738 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang, H. et al. Injectable ultrasonic sensor for wireless monitoring of intracranial signals. Nature 630, 84–90 (2024).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, Y. et al. In-ear integrated sensor array for the continuous monitoring of brain activity and of lactate in sweat. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 1307–1320 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi, Y. S. et al. A transient, closed-loop network of wireless, body-integrated devices for autonomous electrotherapy. Science 376, 1006–1012 (2022).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuiken, T. A. et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA 301, 619–628 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Musk, E. An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e16194 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Powell, M. P. et al. Epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord for post-stroke upper-limb paresis. Nat. Med. 29, 689–699 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ausra, J. et al. Wireless, fully implantable cardiac stimulation and recording with on-device computation for closed-loop pacing and defibrillation. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq7469 (2022).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen, K., Chen, O., Edmunds, J. L., Piech, D. K. & Maharbiz, M. M. Translational opportunities and challenges of invasive electrodes for neural interfaces. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 424–442 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan, W. et al. Structured nanoscale metallic glass fibres with extreme aspect ratios. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 875–882 (2020).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yi, J. et al. Water-responsive supercontractile polymer films for bioelectronic interfaces. Nature 624, 295–302 (2023).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong, C. et al. Electrochemically actuated microelectrodes for minimally invasive peripheral nerve interfaces. Nat. Mater. 23, 969–976 (2024).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, A. et al. Ultraflexible endovascular probes for brain recording through micrometer-scale vasculature. Science 381, 306–312 (2023).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, J. et al. A tissue-like neurotransmitter sensor for the brain and gut. Nature 606, 94–101 (2022).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tringides, C. M. et al. Viscoelastic surface electrode arrays to interface with viscoelastic tissues. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1019–1029 (2021).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, Y. et al. A low-power stretchable neuromorphic nerve with proprioceptive feedback. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 511–519 (2023).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Metzger, S. L. et al. A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control. Nature 620, 1037–1046 (2023).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Squair, J. W. et al. Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury. Nature 590, 308–314 (2021).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guan, S. et al. Self-assembled ultraflexible probes for long-term neural recordings and neuromodulation. Nat. Protoc. 18, 1712–1744 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Feiner, R. & Dvir, T. Tissue–electronics interfaces: from implantable devices to engineered tissues. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 17076 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kathe, C. et al. The neurons that restore walking after paralysis. Nature 611, 540–547 (2022).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Garwood, I. C. et al. Multifunctional fibers enable modulation of cortical and deep brain activity during cognitive behavior in macaques. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh0974 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramezani, M. et al. High-density transparent graphene arrays for predicting cellular calcium activity at depth from surface potential recordings. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 504–513 (2024).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, Y. et al. A high-density 1,024-channel probe for brain-wide recordings in non-human primates. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 1620–1631 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, Z. et al. Ultraflexible electrode arrays for months-long high-density electrophysiological mapping of thousands of neurons in rodents. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 520–532 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Viana, D. et al. Nanoporous graphene-based thin-film microelectrodes for in vivo high-resolution neural recording and stimulation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 514–523 (2024).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, L. et al. Functionalized helical fibre bundles of carbon nanotubes as electrochemical sensors for long-term in vivo monitoring of multiple disease biomarkers. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 159–171 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, Z. et al. A 1.3-micrometre-thick elastic conductor for seamless on-skin and implantable sensors. Nat. Electron. 5, 784–793 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sahasrabudhe, A., Cea, C. & Anikeeva, P. Multifunctional bioelectronics for brain-body circuits. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 3, 465–484 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao, Q. et al. Highly stretchable and customizable microneedle electrode arrays for intramuscular electromyography. Sci. Adv. 10, eadn7202 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, Z. et al. Highly stable and stretchable conductive films through-thermal-radiation-assisted metal encapsulation. Adv. Mater. 31, 1901360 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Panidi, I. et al. Muscle architecture adaptations to static stretching training: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med. Open 9, 47 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Thelen, D. G. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. J. Biomech. Eng. 125, 70–77 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Uguz, I. & Shepard, K. L. Spatially controlled, bipolar, cortical stimulation with high-capacitance, mechanically flexible subdural surface microelectrode arrays. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq6354 (2022).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ortiz-Catalan, M. et al. A highly integrated bionic hand with neural control and feedback for use in daily life. Sci. Robot. 8, eadf7360 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, B. et al. Magnetically driven biohybrid blood hydrogel fibres for personalized intracranial tumour therapy under fluoroscopic tracking. Nat. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01382-z (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Canales, A. et al. Multifunctional fibers for simultaneous optical, electrical and chemical interrogation of neural circuits in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 277–284 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zheng, X. S. et al. Evaluation of a conducting elastomeric composite material for intramuscular electrode application. Acta Biomater. 103, 81–91 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Guan, S. et al. Elastocapillary self-assembled neurotassels for stable neural activity recordings. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav2842 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sahasrabudhe, A. et al. Multifunctional microelectronic fibers enable wireless modulation of gut and brain neural circuits. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 892–904 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee, J. et al. Stretchable and suturable fibre sensors for wireless monitoring of connective tissue strain. Nat. Electron. 4, 291–301 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements  

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFF0501600, 2021YFF0501601, 2021YFF0501602), National Natural Science Foundation of China (62101545, 62201558, 52473269, 62201559, 62471462, 52450017, 52202167, U22A2064), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (KQTD20210811090217009, RCJC20231211085926038, KJZD20230923114108015), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB0930000), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720230041), the International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (321GJHZ2024176MI), CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (YSBR-114), GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515011160) and Laboratory of Aerospace Entry, Descent and Landing Technology Fund (EDL19092301). Partially supported by Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science (NSY889021054), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Multimodality Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces (grant no. 2024B1212010010), the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFB4705300) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.L. conceived the project. W.Y. designed the concept. R.X., F.H., Q.Y., D.L., W.Y., T.X. and Z.L. designed the experiments. The device design, fabrication, as well as its mechanical, electrical and electrochemical measurements were carried out by R.X. R.X., Q.Y. and F.H. performed the animal experiments, including in vitro and in vivo EMG and strain measurements, with assistance from H.Y. and J.H. R.X. and J.H. further demonstrated the application of NeuroWorm for nerve damage assessment. Q.Y. conducted gait analysis. F.H., R.X. and D.L. conducted NeuroWorm locomotion studies in agar. F.H., Q.Y. and D.L. performed magnetic-guided implantation of NeuroWorm through brain and muscle tissue, along with ECoG measurements. Q.Y., R.X. and F.H. recorded intraluminal intestinal electrical signals in rabbit colon. D.L. and G.M. performed finite element analysis and experimental validation of brain needle penetration mechanics. Q.Y., J.H. and R.X. conducted immunohistological analysis of tissue responses. X.H. and X.X. assisted with device fabrication and illustration preparation. X.Z. and X.D. provided test equipment. Q.Y., H.Z., Q.T., Q.L. and H.L. contributed to NeuroWorm extraction after long-term implantation and Y.Z. performed scanning electron microscopy imaging and photography. R.X., F.H., Q.Y. and D.L. analysed the data, with help from H.Z., G.L. and M.Z. The manuscript was written by R.X., F.H., D.L., W.Y., T.X. and Z.L., with all authors participating in discussions and approving the final version. Project supervision was provided by Z.L., T.X., W.Y. and F.H.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fei Han, Wei Yan, Tiantian Xu or Zhiyuan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.X. and Z.L. are inventors on a Chinese patent application (no. CN202310429321.2).

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Preparation and mechanical properties of NeuroWorm.

a, Schematic illustration of the composite film being rolled up from the substrate. b, Scanning electron microscopy image of the film electrode after being rolled up (30-nm-thick Au layer deposited at a rate of 0.5 Å s−1). The experiment was repeated independently ten times with similar results. c, Stretchability of NeuroWorm with different thicknesses of Au at a fixed conductive path width (n = 3 independent samples and presented as mean ± s.d.). Au layer deposited at a rate of 0.5 Å s−1. d, Stretchability of film electrodes with different conductive path widths at a fixed Au thickness of 30 nm and deposition rate of 0.5 Å s−1 (n = 3 independent samples and presented as mean ± s.d.). e, Effect of SEBS concentration on stretchability of fibre sensors at 0.3 Å s−1 deposition rate. f, Stretchability of the 60-channel NeuroWorm (Au layer of 30 nm thickness and 200 μm width, deposited at a rate of 0.5 Å s−1). g, Electrode patterns design of NeuroWorm. h, Diameter of NeuroWorm fabricated from thin-film electrodes with different widths (Au layer of 30 nm thickness and deposited at a rate of 0.5 Å s−1).

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Physical and electrical characterization of NeuroWorm and material variants.

a, Statistical data of diameter (D), Young’s modulus (E) and stretchability (S) of NeuroWorm used for implantation. Data were collected from n = 10 samples and presented as mean ± s.d. b, Stress–strain curve of NeuroWorm. c, Interface design between NeuroWorm and signal acquisition devices. d, Resistance of the 400-nm-thick SEBS film. e, Crosstalk test across different channels. f, Resistance change of NeuroWorm during the 1st and 1,000th stretching–releasing cycles at 30% strain. g, Image of NeuroWorm rolled with liquid metal. h, Stretchability of NeuroWorm with liquid metal as electrodes. i, Changes of the impedance of NeuroWorm when stretched to 30%. Data were collected from n = 3 samples and presented as mean ± s.d. j, Performance of the fibre capacitive strain sensor after being stretched to 20% for 1,000 cycles. k, Impedance of NeuroWorm before and after ultraviolet disinfection. Data were collected from n = 3 samples. m,n, Image of the ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)-based and the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based fibre sensor. o, Stretchability of EVA-based and PDMS-based NeuroWorms.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Performance comparison in ECoG recording using NeuroWorm and cranially fixed electrodes.

a, Image of the NeuroWorm beneath the dura mater. Scale bar, 2 mm. b, Schematic showing the channel distribution of NeuroWorm (channels 1–10) and cranially fixed electrodes (channels 11–20). c,d, Time-domain signals (c) and corresponding frequency spectra (d) of ECoG signals recorded by NeuroWorm (see b). e,f, Time-domain signals (e) and frequency spectra (f) of ECoG signals recorded from cranially fixed electrodes. g, Comparison of the signal-to-noise ratio of ECoG signals recorded by NeuroWorm and cranially fixed electrodes. The mean signal-to-noise ratio of NeuroWorm is higher than that of cranially fixed electrodes; n = 10 channels signal examined over an independent experiment and presented as mean ± s.d. A two-tailed paired t-test was used for statistical analysis, P = 0.003 < 0.05).

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 4 LFP time–frequency analysis & NeuroWorm steering in a magnetically controlled obstacle-avoidance scenario.

a, LFP time–frequency diagram corresponding to Fig. 3e. b, Schematic illustration of NeuroWorm steering within a 3D-printed cerebral vascular model guided by rotating magnetic head. c, Sequential flow diagram (I–IV) showing the set-up of a printed cerebral vascular model filled with 0.5 wt% agar. d, Images and corresponding schematic diagrams of NeuroWorm exhibiting controllable wandering ability within the agar-infused cerebral vascular model over a 43-s period. Scale bars, 1.5 mm.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Six orthogonal views obtained from DSA, illustrating the NeuroWorm at distinct positions within brain tissue.

a, Front view of the steering process. b, Top view of the steering process. P1–P6, positions 1–6. Scale bars, 4 mm.

Extended Data Fig. 6 3D reconstruction of the NeuroWorm’s trajectory as it steers through brain tissue (corresponding to Extended Data Fig. 5).

a, Isometric projection. bd, Orthographic projections.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Intraluminal intestinal electrical signal recording in the rabbit colon.

a, Image of NeuroWorm implanted in rabbit colon. Scale bar, 3 cm. b, Insertion pathway and final position of NeuroWorm within the rabbit colon. Scale bars, 2 cm. c, Time-domain representation of colon electrical signals from seven channels. d, Time–frequency analysis of the corresponding signals obtained by means of wavelet transform.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Muscle flexion angle sensing and CMAP potential recording.

a, Measurement of the femoral and tibial joints angles. b, Capacitance values corresponding to different joint angles. c, Set-up of NeuroWorm for monitoring CMAP signals evoked by sciatic nerve stimulation. d, CMAP signals evoked by varying stimulation currents detected by channel 1. e, CMAP signals evoked by varying stimulation currents detected by channel 2. f, Assessing the extent of nerve damage by NeuroWorm.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Implantation strategy and long-term electrophysiological performance of the NeuroWorm system.

a, Photograph of the NeuroWorm system, encompassing the fibre sensor, the soft–hard interface and connection to the skull by means of SSW. b, Photograph showing the implantation incision for the thin-film electrode. c, Recorded EMG signals during gait testing. d, Impedance changes of NeuroWorm (n = 4 samples) and SSW (n = 2 samples) over 43 weeks of implantation.

Source Data

Extended Data Table 1 Detailed information on the individual implantations of NeuroWorm in five rats
Extended Data Table 2 Performance comparison of NeuroWorm with reported fibre sensors

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

This file contains Supplementary Figs. 1–12, Supplementary Table 1 and scripts for plotting Extended Data Figs. 3d, 3f, 4a and 7d.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Supplementary Data (download ZIP )

Source data Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, 4 and 12.

Supplementary Video 1 (download MP4 )

Fabrication process of NeuroWorm.

Supplementary Video 2 (download MP4 )

Controllable movement of NeuroWorm on cortical and subcortical regions using an external magnetic field for ECoG and LFP signal monitoring.

Supplementary Video 3 (download MP4 )

Controllable movement of NeuroWorm on muscles using an external magnetic field for continuous 7-day electromyography monitoring.

Supplementary Video 4 (download MP4 )

Implantation of NeuroWorm in an artificial brain under magnetic field.

Supplementary Video 5 (download MP4 )

Demonstration of the safe in vivo and ex vivo extraction of NeuroWorm.

Supplementary Video 6 (download MP4 )

Minimally invasive implantation process of NeuroWorm.

Supplementary Video 7 (download MP4 )

Long-term implantable monitoring of intramuscular EMG during movement.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, R., Han, F., Yu, Q. et al. A movable long-term implantable soft microfibre for dynamic bioelectronics. Nature 645, 648–655 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09344-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09344-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing