Fig. 2: Planetary radius versus orbital period and planetary mass. | Nature

Fig. 2: Planetary radius versus orbital period and planetary mass.

From: A young progenitor for the most common planetary systems in the Galaxy

Fig. 2

a,b, Planetary radius versus orbital period (a) and planetary radius versus planetary mass (b) for the V1298 Tau system (red filled circles); error bars represent 1σ uncertainties. The low-density planets of the Kepler-51 system are shown for comparison (purple squares), along with kernel density estimates of the distributions of well-characterized exoplanets (shaded contours), drawn from the NASA Exoplanet Archive (n = 624 planets with mass and radius uncertainties less than 20%, P < 150 days and host Teff = 4,500–6,500 K to exclude M dwarfs). The parameters of the Kepler-51 planets were sourced from the ‘outside 2:1’ solution in Table 6 of ref. 27. Theoretical radius evolution tracks from ref. 29 are shown as vertical dashed lines. The terminal radii at 5 Gyr from that work are shown as open triangles. The colour indicates the assumed core mass (red for 5 M and black for 10 M). The orientation represents the stellar extreme-ultraviolet activity level (upwards for high activity and downwards for low activity). The black dashed line in a depicts the observed location of the radius valley28. Theoretical mass–radius relations for different planet compositions from ref. 31 are shown in b as dashed lines. Grey dotted lines indicate theoretical mass–radius relations for Earth-like cores with H/He envelopes with various mass fractions from ref. 30, calculated for an age of 100 Myr and an insolation of 10 F.

Back to article page