Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

An electrically injected solid-state surface acoustic wave phonon laser

Abstract

Surface acoustic waves (SAWs) enable a wide array of technologies, including radiofrequency filters1,2, chemical and biological sensors3,4,5, acousto-optic devices6,7,8, acoustic control of microfluidic flow in lab-on-a-chip systems9,10,11 and quantum phononics12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Although numerous methods exist for generating SAWs, they each have intrinsic limitations that inhibit performance, operation at high frequencies and use in systems constrained in size, weight and power. Here we present a completely solid-state, single-chip SAW phonon laser consisting of a lithium niobate SAW resonator with an internal, d.c. electrically injected and broadband semiconductor gain medium with <0.15 mm2 footprint. Below the threshold bias of 36 V, the device behaves as a resonant amplifier, and above it exhibits self-sustained coherent oscillation, linewidth narrowing and high output powers. A continuous on-chip acoustic output power of up to −6.1 dBm is generated at 1 GHz with a resolution-limited linewidth of <77 Hz and a carrier phase noise of −57 dBc Hz−1 at 1 kHz offset. Through detailed modelling, we show pathways for improving the performance of these devices, including mHz linewidths, high power efficiencies and footprints under 550 μm2 at 10 GHz. This demonstration paves the way for ultrahigh-frequency SAW sources on-chip and highly miniaturized SAW-based systems that can be operated without an external radiofrequency source.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The SAW-PL.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Passive resonator and resonant amplifier characterization.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Phonon lasing characterization.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Improved architectures for near-term applications and high-frequency generation.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

No custom computer code or mathematical algorithm was used to generate the results that are reported in this study.

References

  1. Morgan, D. Surface Acoustic Wave Filters: With Applications to Electronic Communications and Signal Processing (Academic Press, 2010).

  2. Hashimoto, K. Surface Acoustic Wave Devices in Telecommunications: Modelling and Simulation Vol. 116 (Springer, 2000).

  3. Mandal, D. & Banerjee, S. Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors: physics, materials, and applications. Sensors 22, 820 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu, X. et al. Harnessing exceptional points for ultrahigh sensitive acoustic wave sensing. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 11, 44 (2025).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, X. et al. Advances in sensing mechanisms and micro/nanostructured sensing layers for surface acoustic wave-based gas sensors. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 9216–9238 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shao, L. et al. Microwave-to-optical conversion using lithium niobate thin-film acoustic resonators. Optica 6, 1498–1505 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassanien, A. E. et al. Efficient and wideband acousto-optic modulation on thin-film lithium niobate for microwave-to-photonic conversion. Photon. Res. 9, 1182–1190 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kittlaus, E. A. et al. Electrically driven acousto-optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics. Nat. Photon. 15, 43–52 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, S. et al. Harmonic acoustics for dynamic and selective particle manipulation. Nat. Mater. 21, 540–546 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ding, X. et al. Surface acoustic wave microfluidics. Lab Chip 13, 3626–3649 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin, X. et al. Acoustic valves in microfluidic channels for droplet manipulation. Lab Chip 21, 3165–3173 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Whiteley, S. J. et al. Spin–phonon interactions in silicon carbide addressed by Gaussian acoustics. Nat. Phys. 15, 490–495 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maity, S. et al. Coherent acoustic control of a single silicon vacancy spin in diamond. Nat. Commun. 11, 193 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Arrangoiz-Arriola, P. et al. Resolving the energy levels of a nanomechanical oscillator. Nature 571, 537–540 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schütz, M. J. in Quantum Dots for Quantum Information Processing: Controlling and Exploiting the Quantum Dot Environment 143–196 (Springer, 2017).

  16. Zhou, Y. et al. Electrically interfaced Brillouin-active waveguide for microwave photonic measurements. Nat. Commun. 15, 6796 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sletten, L. R., Moores, B. A., Viennot, J. J. & Lehnert, K. W. Resolving phonon fock states in a multimode cavity with a double-slit qubit. Phys. Rev. 9, 021056 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Qiao, H. et al. Acoustic phonon phase gates with number-resolving phonon detection. Nat. Phys.21, 1801–1805 (2025).

  19. Zivari, A. et al. On-chip distribution of quantum information using traveling phonons. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd2811 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Agostini, M. & Cecchini, M. Ultra-high-frequency (UHF) surface-acoustic-wave (SAW) microfluidics and biosensors. Nanotechnology 32, 312001 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, P. et al. Acoustic separation of circulating tumor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4970–4975 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou, Y. et al. Nonreciprocal dissipation engineering via strong coupling with a continuum of modes. Phys. Rev. X 14, 021002 (2024).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Freedman, J. M. et al. Gigahertz-frequency, acousto-optic phase modulation of visible light in a CMOS-fabricated photonic circuit. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.08012 (2025).

  24. Li, B., Lin, Q. & Li, M. Frequency–angular resolving LiDAR using chip-scale acousto-optic beam steering. Nature 620, 316–322 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin Q. et al. Optical multi-beam steering and communication using integrated acousto-optics arrays. Nat. Commun. 16, 4501 (2025).

  26. Zhao, H., Li, B., Li, H. & Li, M. Enabling scalable optical computing in synthetic frequency dimension using integrated cavity acousto-optics. Nat. Commun. 13, 5426 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Neuman, T. et al. A phononic interface between a superconducting quantum processor and quantum networked spin memories. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 121 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nehra, R. et al. Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in nanophotonics. Science 377, 1333–1337 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tucker, E. Amplification of 9.3-kmc/sec ultrasonic pulses by maser action in ruby. Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 547 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fokker, P. A., Dijkhuis, J. I. & De Wijn, H. W. Stimulated emission of phonons in an acoustical cavity. Phys. Rev. B 55, 2925 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vahala, K. et al. A phonon laser. Nat. Phys. 5, 682–686 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pettit, R. M. et al. An optical tweezer phonon laser. Nat. Photon. 13, 402–405 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Grudinin, I. S., Lee, H., Painter, O. & Vahala, K. J. Phonon laser action in a tunable two-level system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 083901 (2010).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beardsley, R. P., Akimov, A. V., Henini, M. & Kent, A. J. Coherent terahertz sound amplification and spectral line narrowing in a stark ladder superlattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 085501 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chafatinos, D. L. et al. Polariton-driven phonon laser. Nat. Commun. 11, 4552 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Papuccio-Fernández, I. et al. Polariton cascade phonon laser. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.17336 (2025).

  37. Ohtani, K. et al. An electrically pumped phonon-polariton laser. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau1632 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Okada, J. & Matino, H. Continuous oscillations of acoustoelectric current in CdS. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 3, 698 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Maines, J. D. & Paige, E. G. S. Current-spiking and self-locking of modes of the acousto-electric oscillator. Solid State Commun. 8, 421–425 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gokhale, V. J. & Rais-Zadeh, M. Phonon-electron interactions in piezoelectric semiconductor bulk acoustic wave resonators. Sci. Rep. 4, 5617 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mansoorzare, H. & Abdolvand, R. Acoustoelectric amplification in lateral-extensional composite piezo-silicon resonant cavities. In Proc. 2019 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and European Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF/IFC), 1–3 (IEEE, 2019).

  42. Hackett, L. et al. Non-reciprocal acoustoelectric microwave amplifiers with net gain and low noise in continuous operation. Nat. Electron. 6, 76–85 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hackett, L. et al. Towards single-chip radiofrequency signal processing via acoustoelectric electron–phonon interactions. Nat. Commun. 12, 2769 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hackett, L. et al. Giant electron-mediated phononic nonlinearity in semiconductor–piezoelectric heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 23, 1386–1393 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Izhar, M. M. A. et al. Periodically poled aluminum scandium nitride bulk acoustic wave resonators and filters for communications in the 6G era. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 11, 19 (2025).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kino, G. S. & Reeder, T. M. A normal mode theory for the Rayleigh wave amplifier. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 18, 909–920 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Pippard, A. Acoustic amplification in semiconductors and metals. Philos. Mag. 8, 161–165 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Coldren, L. A. Monolithic Acoustic Surface Wave Amplifiers. PhD thesis, Stanford Univ. (1972).

  49. Chatterjee, E., Soh, D. & Eichenfield, M. Quantum-limited acoustoelectric amplification in a piezoelectric-2DEG heterostructure. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/html/2510.09248v2 (2025).

  50. Danicki, E. Reversing multistrip coupler. Ultrasonics 31, 421–424 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Keysight Technologies. Measuring phase noise with a real-time sampling oscilloscope. https://docs.keysight.com/kkbopen/measuring-phase-noise-with-a-real-time-sampling-oscilloscope-584447063.html (2025).

  52. Rhea, R. W. Oscillator Design & Computer Simulation (Prentice Hall, 1990).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based on research sponsored in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) through a Young Faculty Award under grant D23AP00174-00. The views and conclusions contained here are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, by DARPA, the Department of the Interior, or the US government. This work is supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development programme at Sandia National Laboratories, a multimission laboratory managed and operated by the National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the US Department of Energy under contract DE-NA0003525. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility, operated for the US Department of Energy Office of Science. This paper describes objective technical results and analysis. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Energy or the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.W., M.J.S. and M.E. came up with the device concepts and experimental implementations. A.W. performed simulations of the main devices. W.H. performed simulations of the proposed wave-guided device. E.C. developed the spontaneous emission theory. P.-S.W. performed the epitaxial growth. S.A. and T.A.F. bonded the heterostructures. M.M. and B.S. fabricated the devices. L.H. coordinated the semiconductor growth bonding and fabrication. A.W. and D.A. made all measurements. A.W., M.J.S. and M.E. analysed all data. A.W., M.J.S. and M.E. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Eichenfield.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Sourav Banerjee, Siddartha Ghosh, Kevin Silverman, Zixuan Wang, Guangzong Xiao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Broadband threshold behavior.

Under threshold, multiple longitudinal modes demonstrate amplified spontaneous emission. Upon reaching threshold, one single mode undergoes linewidth narrowing and oscillates. The other modes continue to demonstrate low levels of amplified spontaneous emission.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Additional device characterization.

Four additional devices were characterized. Here we display the threshold, linewidth narrowing, phase noise, and linewidth of each device.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wendt, A., Storey, M.J., Miller, M. et al. An electrically injected solid-state surface acoustic wave phonon laser. Nature 649, 597–603 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09950-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09950-8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing