Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cavity-driven attractive interactions in quantum materials

Abstract

Many-body phenomena in quantum materials emerge from the interplay among a broad continuum of electronic states and controlling these interactions is critical for engineering new phases. One promising approach exploits light confined within optical cavities to tailor electronic properties1. Here we demonstrate that terahertz cavity photons can mediate attractive interactions in a tunable van der Waals (vdW) material and reorganize a continuum of electron–hole transitions into an exciton-like state. We introduce a broadband, sub-wavelength time-domain microscope that integrates exfoliated, dual-gated 2D quantum materials into a terahertz cavity. This approach enables the spectroscopic measurement of the field-tunable bandgap of bilayer graphene2 (BLG) in the terahertz range and, at resonance, reveals ultrastrong coupling3 (USC) with an effective interaction strength exceeding g/ωc ≈ 40% of the bare photon energy. Crucially, we identify a cavity-induced resonance emerging from the interband continuum that resembles Coulomb-bound excitons and remains stable across a broad temperature range. Our findings propose an experimental platform for designing and investigating hybrid light–matter phases in 2D quantum matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Sub-wavelength terahertz spectroscopy of cavity-induced bound states.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Gate-tuned transport and terahertz cavity response of BLG.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Observation of polariton formation.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Theory.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Temperature dependence.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The numerical simulations and measurement datasets underlying the figures in this paper are available from the corresponding author on request. The raw data that support the findings of this article are also available in the ETH Research Collection (https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-c-000797558).

Code availability

The code used in the theoretical part of this study is available from the corresponding author on request and in the ETH Research Collection (http://doi.org/10.5905/ethz-1007-932).

References

  1. Lu, I.-T. et al. Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving. Adv. Opt. Photonics 17, 441–525 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, Y. et al. Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature 459, 820–823 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., De Liberato, S., Savasta, S. & Nori, F. Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 19–40 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Disa, A. S., Nova, T. F. & Cavalleri, A. Engineering crystal structures with light. Nat. Phys. 17, 1087–1092 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu, I. et al. Cavity-enhanced superconductivity in MgB2 from first-principles quantum electrodynamics (QEDFT). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2415061121 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashida, Y. et al. Quantum electrodynamic control of matter: cavity-enhanced ferroelectric phase transition. Phys. Rev. X 10, 041027 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Latini, S. et al. The ferroelectric photo ground state of SrTiO3: Cavity materials engineering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2105618118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Andolina, G. M., Pellegrino, F. M. D., Giovannetti, V., MacDonald, A. H. & Polini, M. Theory of photon condensation in a spatially varying electromagnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 102, 125137 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, J. & Eckstein, M. Manipulating intertwined orders in solids with quantum light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 217402 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jarc, G. et al. Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1T-TaS2. Nature 622, 487–492 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Appugliese, F. et al. Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect. Science 375, 1030–1034 (2022).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Enkner, J. et al. Tunable vacuum-field control of fractional and integer quantum Hall phases. Nature 641, 884–889 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Khurgin, J. Excitonic radius in the cavity polariton in the regime of very strong coupling. Solid State Commun. 117, 307–310 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cortese, E., Carusotto, I., Colombelli, R. & De Liberato, S. Strong coupling of ionizing transitions. Optica 6, 354–361 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar, S. S., Parish, M. M. & Levinsen, J. Microscopic theory of excitons bound by light. Phys. Rev. B 106, 205414 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cortese, E. et al. Excitons bound by photon exchange. Nat. Phys. 17, 31–35 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bloch, J., Freixanet, T., Marzin, J. Y., Thierry-Mieg, V. & Planel, R. Giant Rabi splitting in a microcavity containing distributed quantum wells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1694–1696 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Regan, E. C. et al. Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices. Nature 579, 359–363 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shimazaki, Y. et al. Strongly correlated electrons and hybrid excitons in a moiré heterostructure. Nature 580, 472–477 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ciorciaro, L. et al. Kinetic magnetism in triangular moiré materials. Nature 623, 509–513 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cai, J. et al. Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2. Nature 622, 63–68 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kavokin, A. V., Baumberg, J. J., Malpuech, G. & Laussy, F. P. Microcavities 2nd edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).

  24. Scalari, G. et al. Ultrastrong coupling of the cyclotron transition of a 2D electron gas to a THz metamaterial. Science 335, 1323–1326 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rajabali, S. et al. An ultrastrongly coupled single terahertz meta-atom. Nat. Commun. 13, 2528 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Basov, D. N., Averitt, R. D., van der Marel, D., Dressel, M. & Haule, K. Electrodynamics of correlated electron materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 471–541 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rajabali, S. et al. Polaritonic nonlocality in light–matter interaction. Nat. Photon. 15, 690–695 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McCann, E. & Koshino, M. The electronic properties of bilayer graphene. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 056503 (2013).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ju, L. et al. Tunable excitons in bilayer graphene. Science 358, 907–910 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Valmorra, F. et al. Low-bias active control of terahertz waves by coupling large-area CVD graphene to a terahertz metamaterial. Nano Lett. 13, 3193–3198 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Liberato, S. Perspectives for gapped bilayer graphene polaritonics. Phys. Rev. B 92, 125433 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Duarte, V. G. M. et al. Tunable exciton polaritons in biased bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 111, 075411 (2025).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Averkiev, N. S. & Glazov, M. M. Light-matter interaction in doped microcavities. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045320 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hopfield, J. J. Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals. Phys. Rev. 112, 1555–1567 (1958).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Henriques, J. C. G., Epstein, I. & Peres, N. M. R. Absorption and optical selection rules of tunable excitons in biased bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 105, 045411 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sauer, M. O. & Pedersen, T. G. Exciton absorption, band structure, and optical emission in biased bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 105, 115416 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. De Liberato, S. Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system. Nat. Commun. 8, 1465 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Geiser, M. et al. Strong light-matter coupling at terahertz frequencies at room temperature in electronic LC resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 191107 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kipp, G. et al. Cavity electrodynamics of van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 21, 1926–1933 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Grischkowsky, D. R. Optoelectronic characterization of transmission lines and waveguides by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6, 1122–1135 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Haastrup, S. et al. The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater. 5, 042002 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang, J. et al. Spectroscopy signatures of electron correlations in a trilayer graphene/hBN moiré superlattice. Science 375, 1295–1299 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ma, L. et al. Strongly correlated excitonic insulator in atomic double layers. Nature 598, 585–589 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Brem, S. & Malic, E. Terahertz fingerprint of monolayer Wigner crystals. Nano Lett. 22, 1311–1315 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Guo, X. et al. Terahertz nanoscopy: advances, challenges, and the road ahead. Appl. Phys. Rev. 11, 021306 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kozin, V. K., Thingstad, E., Loss, D. & Klinovaja, J. Cavity-enhanced superconductivity via band engineering. Phys. Rev. B 111, 035410 (2025).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou, H. et al. Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene. Science 375, 774–778 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mazza, G. & Georges, A. Superradiant quantum materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017401 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Andolina, G. M., Pellegrino, F. M. D., Giovannetti, V., MacDonald, A. H. & Polini, M. Cavity quantum electrodynamics of strongly correlated electron systems: a no-go theorem for photon condensation. Phys. Rev. B 100, 121109 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Paul, N., Abouelkomsan, A., Reddy, A. & Fu, L. Shining light on collective modes in moiré fractional Chern insulators. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17569 (2025).

  51. Pierret, A. et al. Dielectric permittivity, conductivity and breakdown field of hexagonal boron nitride. Mater. Res. Express 9, 065901 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bandurin, D. A. et al. Resonant terahertz detection using graphene plasmons. Nat. Commun. 9, 5392 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yoshioka, K. et al. On-chip transfer of ultrashort graphene plasmon wave packets using terahertz electronics. Nat. Electron. 7, 537–544 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao, W. et al. Observation of hydrodynamic plasmons and energy waves in graphene. Nature 614, 688–693 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tomadin, A., Carrega, M. & Polini, M. Microscopic theory of plasmon-enabled resonant terahertz detection in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 103, 085426 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ciuti, C., Bastard, G. & Carusotto, I. Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field. Phys. Rev. B 72, 115303 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Fano, U. Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts. Phys. Rev. 124, 1866–1878 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Byrnes, S. J. Multilayer optical calculations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02720 (2020).

  59. McCann, E. Asymmetry gap in the electronic band structure of bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 74, 161403 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Jöchl for discussions on lens assembly and sample processing. F.H. acknowledges discussions on sample fabrication with the Ensslin group (J. Gerber, M. Niese and M. Ruckriegel) and Z. Hao, support from the FIRST cleanroom staff, as well as M. Baer for the design of the sample holder. T.F.N. thanks M. Buzzi and M. Schiro for fruitful discussions. The BNA terahertz generation crystals were provided by Swiss Terahertz LLC. T.F.N. discloses support for the research of this work from the ETH Postdoctoral Fellowship programme, which also supported approximately 30% of the experimental set-up. F.H. and A.İ. disclose support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF; grant nos. 200020 and 207520). J.F. and G.S. disclose support from the SNSF (grant no. 10000397). H.S.A. discloses support from the Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship. I.K. acknowledges the financial assistance of the Rothschild Post-Doctoral Fellowship from Yad HaNadiv, the Helen Diller Quantum Center and the Viterbi Post-Doctoral Fellowships from Technion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.F.N. and F.H. conceived the project, with input from J.F., G.S. and A.İ. All five interpreted the data. F.H. and T.F.N. designed and built the terahertz set-up, fabricated the devices, planned and performed the transport and terahertz measurements, analysed the experimental data, performed finite-element method and transfer matrix simulations and developed the quantum mechanical model. H.S.A. contributed to the development of the theoretical model. M.K. assisted during the experimental campaign. I.K. contributed to the initial development of the terahertz set-up. G.S. and J.F. contributed to the development of the lens system. T.F.N. and F.H. wrote the manuscript, with input from all authors. T.F.N. supervised the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to F. Helmrich or T. F. Nova.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Band-edge absorption.

a, Schematic of THz absorption by a band edge (top) and the corresponding transmission spectrum (bottom), with an arrow marking the location of the band edge. b, Experimental transmission spectra at various displacement fields |D| > 0 and n = 0 referenced to the insulating state D = −0.36. The arrows mark the onset of absorption, similarly to panel a. Data obtained from device D1 at 5 K.

Extended Data Fig. 2 UP peak as a function of displacement field.

The data are adapted from Fig. 5a. The frequency window is restricted to 2.3–5.4 THz (that is, from just above the cavity frequency up to near the upper end of our spectral window), thereby removing the LP contribution and excluding the noisy high-frequency tails. The vertical axis is rescaled independently for each D (min-to-max within the shown frequency window) to highlight the UP peak. The dashed lines highlight the peak position. a, D = 0 V nm−1. b, D = −0.037 V nm−1. c, D = −0.073 V nm−1. d, D = −0.11 V nm−1.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Sections 1–11 including Supplementary Figs. 1–26 and Supplementary references.

Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Helmrich, F., Adlong, H.S., Kroner, M. et al. Cavity-driven attractive interactions in quantum materials. Nature (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10609-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10609-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing