Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Engineered living glues secrete therapeutic proteins for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

This article has been updated

Abstract

Engineering bacteria to secrete gut therapeutics has been limited by their poor autonomous sensing of pathological cues and inability to sustain localized, long-term therapeutic activity. Here we engineer nonpathogenic Escherichia coli with a blood-inducible gene circuit that secretes the barnacle-derived adhesive protein CP43K and the therapeutic gut-barrier-healing factor TFF3 in response to gastrointestinal bleeding, an indicator of severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Adhesive production enables sustained bacterial attachment to inflamed tissues for up to 10 days or 7 days following a single rectal or oral administration, respectively. This effect depends on bleeding-induced adhesion. Using two mouse models of IBD, the colitis model induced by dextran sulfate sodium and the interleukin-10-knockout mouse model, we demonstrate improved weight recovery, reversed colonic shortening and reduced intestinal bleeding. Additionally, the treatment decreases intestinal inflammation, promotes mucosal repair and restores gut barrier integrity, demonstrating comprehensive therapeutic efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic of the TL-glue system for precise targeting of bleeding sites and prolonged treatment of IBD.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Construction of a blood-inducible gene circuit with high signal-to-noise ratios.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Design and characterization of the engineered L-glue materials.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Evaluation of in vivo anti-IBD and hemostatic efficacy of L-glues.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Histological analysis and anti-inflammatory efficacy evaluation of the L-glues.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the main text and Supplementary Information. Data for Extended Data Fig. 1 were deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA1365448. Source data are provided with this paper.

Change history

  • 29 April 2026

    In the version of this article initially published online, there were errors in the Reporting Summary where information in the Blinding and Data exclusion sections did not match the main article, while in the article Methods “Animal IBD model and enema administration” section, there was a typographical error where the centrifugation, now listed as “4,000 × g,” appeared originally as “150 rpm.” The article and Reporting Summary are now amended in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Yuk, H. et al. Rapid and coagulation-independent haemostatic sealing by a paste inspired by barnacle glue. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1131–1142 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, J. et al. Adhesive anti-fibrotic interfaces on diverse organs. Nature 630, 360–367 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang, T.-C. et al. Materials design by synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 332–350 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart, R. J., Ransom, T. C. & Hlady, V. Natural underwater adhesives. J. Polym. Sci. 49, 757–771 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen, P. Q., Courchesne, N.-M. D., Duraj-Thatte, A., Praveschotinunt, P. & Joshi, N. S. Engineered living materials: prospects and challenges for using biological systems to direct the assembly of smart materials. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704847 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. An, B. et al. Engineered living materials for sustainability. Chem. Rev. 123, 2349–2419 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, J. et al. Programmable and printable Bacillus subtilis biofilms as engineered living materials. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 34–41 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, C. et al. Engineered Bacillus subtilis biofilms as living glues. Mater. Today 28, 40–48 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y. et al. Living materials fabricated via gradient mineralization of light-inducible biofilms. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 351–359 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. An, B. et al. Programming living glue systems to perform autonomous mechanical repairs. Matter 3, 2080–2092 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, F. et al. Design of a genetically programmed barnacle-curli inspired living-cell bioadhesive. Mater. Today Bio 14, 100256 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Praveschotinunt, P. et al. Engineered E. coli Nissle 1917 for the delivery of matrix-tethered therapeutic domains to the gut. Nat. Commun. 10, 5580 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cui, M. et al. NIR light-responsive bacteria with live bio-glue coatings for precise colonization in the gut. Cell Rep. 36, 109690 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang, C. et al. Self-assembled nanofibers for strong underwater adhesion: the trick of barnacles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 25017–25025 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Estrella, L. A. et al. Engineered Escherichia coli biofilms produce adhesive nanomaterials shaped by a patterned 43 kDa barnacle cement protein. Biomacromolecules 22, 365–373 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, C., Lau, C. Y., Ma, F. & Zheng, C. Genome-wide screen identifies curli amyloid fibril as a bacterial component promoting host neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106504118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Miserez, A., Yu, J. & Mohammadi, P. Protein-based biological materials: molecular design and artificial production. Chem. Rev. 123, 2049–2111 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Song, J. et al. The promoting effect of Balanus albicostatus cement protein 19k (Balcp19k) on wound healing by regulating fibroblast migration and relieving early-stage inflammation responses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 289, 138781 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Duraj-Thatte, A. M. et al. Genetically programmable self-regenerating bacterial hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 31, 1901826 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mimee, M. et al. An ingestible bacterial-electronic system to monitor gastrointestinal health. Science 360, 915–918 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, B., Barahona, M. & Buck, M. Engineering modular and tunable genetic amplifiers for scaling transcriptional signals in cascaded gene networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9484–9492 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wan, X. et al. Cascaded amplifying circuits enable ultrasensitive cellular sensors for toxic metals. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 540–548 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matlashov, M. E. et al. A set of monomeric near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor imaging across scales. Nat. Commun. 11, 239 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Barnhart, M. M. & Chapman, M. R. Curli biogenesis and function. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 60, 131–147 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bordeau, V. & Felden, B. Curli synthesis and biofilm formation in enteric bacteria are controlled by a dynamic small RNA module made up of a pseudoknot assisted by an RNA chaperone. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 4682–4696 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma, V. K., Kudva, I. T., Bearson, B. L. & Stasko, J. A. Contributions of EspA filaments and curli fimbriae in cellular adherence and biofilm formation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. PLoS ONE 11, e0149745 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Moser, F., Tham, E., González, L. M., Lu, T. K. & Voigt, C. A. Light-controlled, high-resolution patterning of living engineered bacteria onto textiles, ceramics, and plastic. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1901788 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Ren, J.-J., Hammer, N. D. & Chapman, M. R. Gatekeeper residues in the major curlin subunit modulate bacterial amyloid fiber biogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 163–168 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Manjula-Basavanna, A., Duraj-Thatte, A. M. & Joshi, N. S. Mechanically tunable, compostable, healable and scalable engineered living materials. Nat. Commun. 15, 9179 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Villablanca, E. J., Selin, K. & Hedin, C. R. H. Mechanisms of mucosal healing: treating inflammatory bowel disease without immunosuppression? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 493–507 (2022).

  31. Gustafsson, J. K. & Johansson, M. E. V. The role of goblet cells and mucus in intestinal homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 19, 785–803 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuo, W.-T. et al. The tight junction protein ZO-1 is dispensable for barrier function but critical for effective mucosal repair. Gastroenterology 161, 1924–1939 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Odenwald, M. A. & Turner, J. R. The intestinal epithelial barrier: a therapeutic target? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14, 9–21 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Inda-Webb, M. E. et al. Sub-1.4 cm3 capsule for detecting labile inflammatory biomarkers in situ. Nature 620, 386–392 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, X. et al. Oral delivery of liquid mRNA therapeutics by an engineered capsule for treatment of preclinical intestinal disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 17, eadu1493 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kong, L. et al. The landscape of immune dysregulation in Crohn’s disease revealed through single-cell transcriptomic profiling in the ileum and colon. Immunity 56, 444–458 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rennick, D. M., Fort, M. M. & Davidson, N. J. Studies with IL-10/− mice: an overview. J. Leukoc. Biol. 61, 389–396 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kühn, R., Löhler, J., Rennick, D., Rajewsky, K. & Müller, W. Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell 75, 263–274 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee, J. W., Chan, C. T. Y., Slomovic, S. & Collins, J. J. Next-generation biocontainment systems for engineered organisms. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 530–537 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wright, O., Delmans, M., Stan, G.-B. & Ellis, T. GeneGuard: a modular plasmid system designed for biosafety. ACS Synth. Biol. 4, 307–316 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Triassi, A. J. et al. Redesign of an Escherichia coli Nissle treatment for phenylketonuria using insulated genomic landing pads and genetic circuits to reduce burden. Cell Syst. 14, 512–524 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Liao, H. et al. Data-driven de novo design of super-adhesive hydrogels. Nature 644, 89–95 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ono, K. et al. Photocrosslinkable chitosan as a biological adhesive. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 49, 289–295 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. J. M. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially sponsored by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFA0908100 to C.Z.), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (32125023 to C.Z.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32201105 to B.A. and 32401222 to Q.Z.), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (ZDSYS20220606100606013 to C.Z. and KQTD20190929172538530 to P.H.), the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (GZC20231714 to S.J.), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024T170582 and 2024M752123 to S.J.), the Research Team Cultivation Program of Shenzhen University (2023QNT017 to P.H. and 2023QNT019 to J.L.), the Shenzhen University 2035 Program for Excellent Research (2023B006 to P.H.) and the Program for Youzuzhikeyan of Shenzhen University (SZU2024YZZKY002 to P.H.). We thank the Instrumental Analysis Center of Shenzhen University. We are grateful to T. K. Lu (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and M. Mimee (University of Chicago) for providing the prototype blood-inducible plasmid heme luciferase used in this study. Additionally, we thank Addgene for supplying the plasmid (pXW109 Hg (RS-RinA-E11)2) used in our research and L. Chen for his assistance in the preparation of Figs. 1 and 3a,b,f,h. We would also like to express our gratitude to the Center for Instrumental Analysis at the Materials Synthetic Biology Center and the Shenzhen Synthetic Biology Infrastructure at the Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.Z., P.H. and B.A. conceptualized and directed the research. B.A. and C.G. systematically designed and conducted the experiments on biosensor optimization and L-glue in vitro characterization. P.H., S.J., J.L. and X.C. designed and performed all the animal experiments. W.Z. fabricated the microfluidic devices with the guidance of Y.L. X.J. performed all the microfluidic experiments. X.D. and Q.Z. carried out the partial molecular cloning experiments. C.Y., C.C. and X.S. assisted with the PBMC coculturing and ELISA testing. Y.X., P.Y., Y.L. and S.H. assisted with characterizing the biocompatibility of recombinant barnacle proteins. B.A., C.Z., J.L. and P.H. wrote the paper with help from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bolin An, Peng Huang or Chao Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

C.Z., B.A. and C.G. are coinventors on a patent application (PCT/CN2024/139020) based on the TL-glue covered in this article, filed by the Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology. C.Z. is a founder and equity holder of Shenzhen PAM2L Biotechnologies. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biotechnology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Modulation of gut microbiota by TL-glue treatment.

Comparison of alpha diversity assessed by a, Ace index (Kruskal-Wallis test, P value 0.00114), and b, Shannon diversity index (Kruskal-Wallis test, P value 0.0469). c, Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distance revealed distinct clustering patterns of gut microbial communities among the treatment groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, P value 0.001). d, Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree plot based on Bray-Curtis. e, Column diagram of the relative abundance of gut microbiome at the family level. f, g, h, Relative abundance of Lactobacillus, Limosilactobacillus, and Escherichia-Shigella (Kruskal-Wallis test, P value 0.0017, 0.00334, 0.00469). Box plot consists of five key values: the minimum observed value (the lower whisker), the 25th percentile (Q1), the median, the 75th percentile (Q3), and the maximum observed value (the upper whisker). Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 6 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Oral administration of the engineered living glue system in both healthy and IBD mouse models.

a, Schematic illustration of a L100-55 polymer-based bacterial coating strategy. b, TEM images comparing coated bacteria with uncoated (naked) E. coli. c, Bacterial survival after coating (n = 8 independent experiments; data are presented as mean ± s.d., **P = 0.0017). d, Schematic illustration of oral administration and fecal CFU quantification. e, Representative in vivo fluorescence images of both IBD and healthy mice over 10 days, showing bacterial localization and persistence. f, Quantification of fecal CFUs from both IBD and healthy mice following oral delivery of bacteria (n = 5 independent experiments; data are presented as mean ± s.d.). g, Plasmid retention in fecal bacteria was calculated as the percentage of colonies growing on dual-antibiotic plates (ampicillin and chloramphenicol) relative to those on non-selective plates. h, Representative H&E-stained sections and i, colon damage scores of distal colon tissues from each treatment group (n = 4 independent experiments, mean ± s.d., ****P < 0.0001, **P = 0.0015). Statistical analysis was conducted using a two-tailed Student’s t-test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Evaluation of in vivo anti-IBD efficacy of living glues on IL-10−/− mice model.

a, Body weight changes and b, Disease activity index (DAI) recorded over 42 days post-treatments (n = 5 independent experiments, mean ± SD, a: NS (P = 0.0811), *P = 0.0422, *P = 0.0339, NS (P = 0.9161), ****P < 0.0001, b: NS (P = 0.4651), *P = 0.0249, *P = 0.0125, ****P < 0.0001). DAI scoring criteria are listed in Supplementary Table 2. c, Colon lengths (n = 5 independent experiments, mean ± s.d., ****P < 0.0001, *P = 0.0209, NS (P = 0.3138), *P = 0.0118, *P = 0.0226) and d, digital images of ex vivo gut tissues of experimental mice. e, Spleen weight (n = 5 independent experiments, mean ± s.d., ***P = 0.0002, NS (P = 0.6275), NS (P = 0.357), *P = 0.0278, *P = 0.0216) and f, digital images of ex vivo spleen tissues of experimental mice. g, Representative hematoxylin & eosin (H&E)-stained sections and h, colon damage scores of distal colon tissues from each treatment group (n = 4 independent experiments, mean ± s.d., ****P < 0.0001, NS (P = 0.0558), NS (P = 0.4651), *P = 0.0278, *P = 0.0125). The lower panel in g, shows close-up views. Scale bars = 200 and 50 μm, respectively. Scoring criteria for h are provided in Supplementary Table 3. i-j, Representative immunofluorescence staining images and k, l, m, n, semi-quantitative analysis of colon tissue sections post-treatment in mice (n = 3 independent experiments, mean ± s.d., k: ***P = 0.0002, NS (P = 0.6275), NS (P = 0.357), *P = 0.0278, ***P = 0.0003, l: ****P < 0.0001, NS (P = 0.8266), NS (P = 0.0836), **P = 0.0046, **P = 0.0023, m: ***P = 0.0001, NS (P = 0.8187), ***P = 0.0002, **P = 0.0062, **P = 0.0073, n: ***P = 0.0008, NS (P = 0.9168), NS (P = 0.0233), *P = 0.0151, ***P = 0.0046). Blue: DAPI, Red: Mucin 2, Green: E-Cadherin, Pink: ZO 1, Yellow: Occludin, Black: overlay. Scale bar = 50 μm. o, p, q, r, Levels of cytokines IL-1β, TNF, IL-6, and TGFβ from tissue homogenates, determined by ELISA (n = 5 independent experiments, mean ± s.d., o: ****P < 0.0001, NS (P = 0.6722), NS (P = 0.5671), ***P = 0.0001, ***P = 0.0002, p: ****P < 0.0001, NS (P = 0.6138), NS (P = 0.8608), *P = 0.0106, ***P = 0.0005, q: ****P < 0.0001, NS (P = 0.5395), NS (P = 0.3443), **P = 0.0045, **P = 0.0053, r: NS (P = 0.9077), NS (P = 0.8673), NS (P = 0.8097), **P = 0.0017, ***P = 0.0004). Statistical analysis was conducted using a two-tailed Student’s t-test.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Methods, Figs. 1–17 and Tables 1–6.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, C., Jiang, S., Dong, X. et al. Engineered living glues secrete therapeutic proteins for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Biotechnol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02970-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02970-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing