Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

Patents

Balancing innovation and integrity: the biomedical research ecosystem at a crossroads

The prospect of reduced funding, more stringent conflict-of-interest policies and research reproducibility are among the growing challenges to sustained US leadership in biomedical translation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. National Institutes of Health. Mission and Goals https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/mission-goals (2024).

  2. Weinstein, E. S. Beijing’s ‘re-innovation’ strategy is key element of US-China competition. Brookings https://www.brookings.edu/articles/beijings-re-innovation-strategy-is-key-element-of-u-s-china-competition/ (6 January 2022).

  3. WIPO. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2025: Highlights: Patent Highlights https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/world-intellectual-property-indicators-2025-highlights/en/patents-highlights.html (2025).

  4. National Institutes of Health. Being Transparent About Conflicts of Interest https://stagetestdomain3.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/science-health-public-trust/perspectives/being-transparent-about-conflicts-interest (2018).

  5. Mandt, R., Seetharam, K. & Cheng, C. H. M. Federal R&D funding: the bedrock of national innovation. MIT Science Policy Review https://sciencepolicyreview.org/2020/08/federal-rd-funding-the-bedrock-of-national-innovation/ (20 August 2020).

  6. DiSanto, R. M., Van Dyke, M., Barker, M. J. & Gourdie, R. G. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1062–1070 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Azoulay, P., Li, D., Zivin, J. S. G. & Sampat, B. N. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86, 117–152 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miteu, G. D. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.) 86, 3192–3195 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ezell, S. The Bayh-Dole Act’s vital importance to the US life science innovation system. Information Technology & Innovation Foundation https://www2.itif.org/2019-bayh-dole-act.pdf (2019).

  10. Pressman, L., Planting, M., Moylan, C. & Bond, J. Economic Contributions of University/Nonprofit Inventions in the United States: 1996–2020 https://autm.net/AUTM/media/About-Tech-Transfer/Documents/BIO-AUTM-Economic-Contributions-of-University-Nonprofit-Inventions_14JUN2022.pdf (2022).

  11. Furman, B. L. Toxicon 59, 464–471 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Code of Federal Regulations. Rights to inventions made by nonprofit organizations and small business firms under government grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-37/chapter-IV/part-401 (2025).

  13. Retraction Watch Database https://gitlab.com/crossref/retraction-watch-data (accessed 6 November 2025).

  14. Grundy, Q., Dunn, A. G., Bourgeois, F. T., Coiera, E. & Bero, L. JAMA 319, 408–409 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen, C., Lundh, A., Rasmussen, K. & Hróbjartsson, A. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 8, MR000047 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Taheri, C. et al. BMJ Open 11, e045306 (2021).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston, J. & Brumbaugh, B. Conflict of interest in biomedical research and clinical practice. The Hastings Center for Bioethics https://www.thehastingscenter.org/briefingbook/conflict-of-interest-in-biomedical-research/ (3 June 2022).

  18. National Institutes of Health. Financial Conflict of Interest https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/fcoi (2024).

  19. WIPO. Intellectual Property Valuation Manual For Academic Institutions https://dacatalogue.wipo.int/projectfiles/DA_10_03/CDIP_17_INF_4/EN/CDIP_17_INF_4_Val_%20Man_bb.pdf (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank C. R. Green and M. Y. Trigiani for reading this manuscript and providing valuable feedback. The Gourdie lab at Virginia Tech is supported by NIH grants 1R35 HL161237 (RGG PI) and R44CA272078 (S. R. Marsh, PI; R.G.G., subaward PI). The Gourdie lab is also supported by gifts from the Red Gates Foundation and Heywood Fralin and family. The funders had no role in manuscript preparation, information collection and the decision to publish.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Gourdie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.G.G. is a co‑founder, shareholder, company officer and board member of The Tiny Cargo Company, Inc., which is developing milk exosome‑based therapeutics originating from his academic laboratory; related intellectual property is licensed from Virginia Tech and targets ischemic heart injury, lethal radiation injury and radiation‑therapy side effects. R.G.G. is a co‑founder, shareholder, company officer and board member of Acomhal Research, Inc., which is developing the JM2 peptide under licenses from the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) for glioblastoma and breast cancer. R.G.G. is a co‑founder and shareholder of Xequel Bio, Inc. (formerly FirstString Research, Inc.), which is developing the αCT1 peptide for wound‑healing indications; JM2 and αCT1 were invented in his laboratory, with related intellectual property licensed from MUSC, his former academic institution. R.G.G. and/or his institutions are associated with issued and pending patents related to the above technologies; details can be found in the Supplementary Information.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gourdie, R.G. Balancing innovation and integrity: the biomedical research ecosystem at a crossroads. Nat Biotechnol 44, 189–192 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02996-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02996-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing