The quality of chemical tools and their appropriate use determine the quality and reliability of scientific data based on their use. Now, two papers extend criteria to new modalities and critically review adherence to established guidelines.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Hartung, I. V., Rudolph, J., Mader, M. M., Mulder, M. P. C. & Workman, P. J. Med. Chem. 66, 9297–9312 (2023).
Sterling, J., Baker, J. R., McCluskey, A. & Munoz, L. Nat. Commun. 14, 3228–3240 (2023).
Workman, P. & Collins, I. Chem. Biol. 17, 561–577 (2010).
Frye, S. V. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 159–161 (2010).
Arrowsmith, C. H. et al. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 536–541 (2015).
Antolin, A. A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1492–D1502 (2023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knapp, S., Müller, S. Improving data quality in chemical biology. Nat Chem Biol 19, 1301–1302 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01449-5
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01449-5
