Fig. 2: An electrostatic network controls the relaxed–twisted conformational transition. | Nature Chemical Biology

Fig. 2: An electrostatic network controls the relaxed–twisted conformational transition.

From: Domain coupling in activation of a family C GPCR

Fig. 2

a, Top: snapshots from an MD simulation, before and after the transition from an active, closed conformation to a relaxed, closed conformation. The distance between the upper and lower lobes of the LBD (or ‘clamshell’) is shown for each subunit; the distance between the lower lobe of each subunit increases to values seen in relaxed-state structures after the transition. Bottom: residues involved in cross-protomer interactions shown on structure of the mGluR2 LBD (left), and shown over time using gray bars (downsampled every 12 ns; right). b, smFRET to monitor intersubunit twisting reveals that R177A and D95A mutations reduce population of the high-FRET peak (left); data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.; four movies per histogram; total number of traces for each condition is shown in the figure. Percentage of high-FRET population in smFRET measurements of intersubunit twisting on additional polar residues at the dimer interface, determined by fitting histograms to sums of two Gaussians (right); data are mean ± s.e.m. across three to four biological replicates (number of traces analyzed per replicate shown in Supplementary Table 1). c, Top: snapshots from MD simulation with just the R177-containing helix shown demonstrate how a salt bridge breaks apart upon transition to the relaxed intermediate (top) and how, after this transition, helix D becomes less ordered (bottom). Ten frames per image, downsampled every 360 ns, before and after the transition. Bottom: a dimerization interface mutant, mGluR2-R177A, exhibits reduced clamshell closure in response to 10 mM glutamate (black) compared to wild-type (compare to Fig. 1c, bottom-left) or to mGluR2-R177A in the presence of high-affinity agonist LY379268 (purple); five movies per histogram; data are mean ± s.e.m. Total number of traces for each condition is shown in the figure.

Source data

Back to article page