Fig. 3: Distinct cell subclusters drive LC signatures in NK cells, CD8+ T cells and CD14+ monocytes. | Nature Immunology

Fig. 3: Distinct cell subclusters drive LC signatures in NK cells, CD8+ T cells and CD14+ monocytes.

From: A distinct monocyte transcriptional state links systemic immune dysregulation to pulmonary impairment in long COVID

Fig. 3

a, UMAP of CD8+ T cells (left) and violin plots of AUC scores of TNF and TLR1–TLR2 pathways (right) within the identified subclusters CD226+ CD8+ T cells (C0), S100A4+ CD8+ T cells (C1), CD69+GZMK+ CD8+ T cells (C2), CD69hiGZMK+ CD8+ T cells (C3) and KLRC2+KLRD1+ CD8+ T cells (C4) from all donors and all time points in cohort 1, as in Fig. 1a. Data were analyzed by two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; ****P < 0.00001. b, UMAP of NK cells (left) and violin plots of AUC scores of TNF and TLR1–TLR2 pathways (right) in identified subclusters PRF1+GZMB+ NK cells (C0), GZMB+KLRF1+ NK cells (C1), GZMK+TGFB1+ NK cells (C2), IFNG+ NK cells (C3) and CALR+S100A9+ NK cells (C4) from all donors at all time points as in Fig. 1a. Data were analyzed by two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; ****P < 0.00001. c, UMAP of CD14+ monocytes from all cohort 1 donors at all time points showing subclusters IL1B+ (MC1), S100A4+ (MC2), FCN1+ (MC3) and TGFB1+ (MC4) cells. d, Top significantly upregulated markers in MC1–MC4 CD14+ monocyte subclusters as in c. Plotted genes were significant with a Benjamini–Hochberg method-adjusted P value of <0.05 (two-sided Wilcoxon test). e, Differential enrichment of neighborhoods representing transcriptional states in LCAM compared to AIM (top) and LCAM compared to RLC (bottom) at months 1.7–2.9, 3–5.9, 6–8.9 and 9–11. Each dot represents a neighborhood of ~150–400 cells. Transcriptional states show significant enrichment with a spatial false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.1 (F-test statistic from the quasilikelihood F-test, graph-weighted FDR). f, AUC scores of TNF, TGFβ and WNT–β-catenin signaling pathways in MC1–MC4 CD14+ monocyte subclusters as in c. Data were analyzed by two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; ****P < 0.00001. Horizontal dashed lines in a, b and f serve as visual reference for comparison of relative shifts in pathway AUC scores across clusters. g, Correlation of the percentage of MC1, MC2, MC3 or MC4 CD14+ monocyte subclusters with FAS score and pO2 (LCAM, n = 38; LCAS, n = 13; RLC, n = 9). Data were analyzed by Spearman correlation. P values were determined using the exact/permutation-based test. The gray shaded area indicates the 95% confidence interval. h, Box plot showing FAS score in MC4hi (>10% of CD14+ monocytes found within MC4, n = 13), MC4lo (<10% of CD14+ monocytes within MC4, n = 26) and RLC (n = 7) samples from individuals with LCAM, LCAS and RLC. Data were analyzed by two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; **P < 0.01. The box plot shows the median (center), first and third quartiles (bounds) and 1.5 times the interquartile range (whiskers).

Back to article page