Extended Data Fig. 4: Ethomic fingerprints – Correlation of joint velocities and body segment velocities and acceleration.

a. A comparison between the Pearson’s correlation coefficient of the angular velocities of the joints between the DMD subjects and healthy controls show significant differences. b. A comparison between the variance of velocity of the extremities of the DMD subjects and healthy controls shows that the variance of the velocity of the healthy controls is significantly greater than that of the DMD subjects for all four extremities c. and d. A comparison between the mean (c) and variance (d) of the acceleration of the different body segments of the DMD subjects and healthy controls shows that the both mean and variance of the acceleration of the healthy controls is significantly greater than that of the DMD subjects Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA, where ∗ represents p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗ is p ≤ 0.01 and ∗∗∗ is p ≤ 0.001. In a-d, data are presented as mean ± standard error (n = 46 DMD visits and n = 21 HC visits). For the exact p-values of the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA tests, see Supplementary Table 5.