Extended Data Fig. 1: Highlighted Regional Miami plots of GWAS and TWAS results. | Nature Medicine

Extended Data Fig. 1: Highlighted Regional Miami plots of GWAS and TWAS results.

From: Depression pathophysiology, risk prediction of recurrence and comorbid psychiatric disorders using genome-wide analyses

Extended Data Fig. 1: Highlighted Regional Miami plots of GWAS and TWAS results.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

corresponding to the genomic region of (a) GABRA1, (b) CYP7B1, (c) DCC, (d) CTTNBP2, (e) FURIN and (f) GIGYF2 genes/transcripts (1Mbp window from start site). Top panels: GWAS results (dots colored according to European ancestry linkage disequilibrium r2 with top SNP): The x-axis shows genomic position, and the y axis shows significance as –log10(P) of z statistics (two-sided nominal P values); blue line corresponds to P = 1 × 10−5, orange line to P = 5 × 10−8 (genome-wide significance). Bottom panels: TWAS results: The x-axis shows genomic position. The y axis shows significance as –log10(P) of z statistics (two-sided nominal P values) for genes represented by both gene expression and isoform expression. Black triangles facing upwards or downwards for a positive or negative association z-score (Wald test; two-sided P values) respectively (up- or down-regulation); transcripts with Bonferroni-adjusted (for all reliably imputed transcripts) P value < 0.1 are labeled; orange line corresponds to Bonferroni-adjusted P = 0.05. Each Bonferroni-significant transcript is connected with lines to the SNPs contributing to its transcriptomic imputation model; lines are gray when the SNPs have a P>1 × 10−5, blue when P < 1 × 10−5 but orange when P < 5 × 10−8. The SNPs that are above the blue line and contribute to the transcriptomic imputation models of significant transcripts are labeled. See Supplementary Fig. 10-1 to 10-88 and Supplementary Table 10.

Back to article page