Extended Data Fig. 6: Effectiveness of simulated screening approaches considered in sensitivity analysis of cancer treatment access.
From: Benefits and harms of cervical screening, triage and treatment strategies in women living with HIV
Reductions in ASMR assuming (a) worst-case cancer treatment access and (b) best-case cancer treatment access compared to no screening in women living with HIV for sensitivity analysis. The error bars around the dots represent the reductions when assuming the best (upper range) and worst (lower range) primary test performance assumptions as described in the Methods. Age-standardisation is calculated using the 2015 World Female Population for ages 0–99 years.
