Table 4 Effect of the intervention on women’s experience outcomes (women in Robson Group 1 or 3)

From: Effects of the WHO Labour Care Guide on cesarean section in India: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial

 

Intervention period (N = 1,277 women)

Control period (N = 1,438 women)

RR (95% CI)a

n/N

(%)

n/N

(%)

 

Women reporting labor companion

982/1,277

(76.9)

1,206/1,438

(83.9)

1.19 (0.89–1.59)

Women reporting being offered pain relief

196/1,277

(15.3)

75/1,438

(5.2)

2.30 (0.00–1,281.82)

Women reporting being very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with how their pain was managed

827/1,277

(64.8)

957/1,437

(66.6)

0.94 (0.06–16.14)

Women reporting being encouraged to drink water

863/1,277

(67.6)

1,123/1,438

(78.1)

0.98 (0.34–2.86)

Women reporting being encouraged to eat food

657/1,277

(51.4)

823/1,438

(57.2)

0.99 (0.13–7.37)

Women reporting being encouraged to walk

827/1,277

(64.8)

863/1,437

(60.1)

1.10 (0.34–3.58)

Women reporting being asked which birth position they preferred

27/1,277

(2.11)

10/1,438

(0.70)

1.96 (0.00–1,384.48)

Women reporting being very or somewhat satisfied with the amount of time the health provider spent with them

1,260/1,277

(98.7)

1,424/1,437

(99.1)

0.99 (0.93–1.05)

Women reporting being very or somewhat satisfied with the way the health provider communicated with them

1,262/1,277

(98.8)

1,424/1,438

(99.0)

0.99 (0.91–1.07)

Women who strongly agreed or agreed that their privacy was respected

1,234/1,277

(96.6)

1,315/1,438

(91.4)

0.99 (0.56–1.75)

Women who reported being asked permission before examinations

596/1,277

(46.7)

992/1,438

(69.0)

0.84 (0.07–10.34)

Women who reported being asked permission before treatments

588/1,277

(46.0)

996/1,438

(69.3)

0.85 (0.07–10.37)

Women who strongly agreed or agreed that they were satisfied with their labor and birth experience

1,268/1,277

(99.3)

1,404/1,438

(97.6)

1.01 (0.95–1.07)

  1. aThe RR and 95% CI were estimated with the generalized estimating equation method employing the Manck and DeRouen bias correction method and a degree of freedom approximation.