Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Building a code of conduct for AI-driven clinical consultations

Can clinical artificial intelligence borrow from the experience of developing safe autonomous vehicles to develop safe autonomous consultations for medicine?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A dynamic framework for the evaluation and continuous improvement of autonomous clinical consultations.

References

  1. Thirunavukarasu, A. J. et al. Nat. Med. 29, 1930–40 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blumenthal, D. & Patel, B. NEJM AI 1, AIpc2400545 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ofstad, E. H., Frich, J. C., Schei, E., Frankel, R. M. & Gulbrandsen, P. BMJ Open 6, e010098 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Balint, M. Lancet 265, 683–688 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurtz, S., Silverman, J., Benson, J. & Draper, J. Acad. Med. 78, 802 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ong, L. M. et al. Psychooncology 7, 387–401 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huo, B. et al. JAMA Netw. Open 8, e2457879 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Johri, S. et al. Nat. Med. 31, 77–86 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dwamena, F. et al. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 12, CD003267 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SAE International. https://go.nature.com/4p1402m (29 April 2021).

  11. Thorn, E., Kimmel, S. C. & Chaka, M. NHTSA https://go.nature.com/47ZdwNs (September 2018).

  12. International Organization for Standardization. bsigroup.com https://go.nature.com/3LKZqqi (6 July 2022).

  13. Favaro, F. et al. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.01917 (2023).

  14. Meinert, E. et al. eClinicalMedicine 73, 102692 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nori, H. et al. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.22405 (2025).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernest Lim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

E.L., A.H. and Y.V.H. are employees of Ufonia, and N.d.P. is an employee and shareholder of Ufonia. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, E., Thirunavukarasu, A., He, Y.V. et al. Building a code of conduct for AI-driven clinical consultations. Nat Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04068-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04068-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing