Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Time-of-day immunochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial

19 February 2026 Editor's Note: The editors are issuing this note to alert readers that concerns have been raised regarding inconsistencies between the registration record of this trial on clinicaltrials.gov and published version the study protocol, as well as with some of the findings in this study. Editorial action will be taken as appropriate once an investigation of the concerns is complete and all parties have been given an opportunity to respond in full.

Abstract

Retrospective studies suggest that early time-of-day (ToD) infusions of immunochemotherapy may improve efficacy. However, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate it. In this randomized phase 3 LungTIME-C01 trial, 210 patients with treatment naive stage IIIC–IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking driver mutations were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an early or late ToD group, defined by the administration of the first four cycles of an anti-PD-1 agent before or after 15:00 h. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). After a median follow-up of 28.7 months, the median PFS was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI) = 9.2–13.4) in the early ToD group and 5.7 months (95% CI = 5.2–6.2) in the late ToD group, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) for earlier disease progression of 0.40 (95% CI = 0.29–0.55; P < 0.001). The median OS was 28.0 months (95% CI = not estimable (NE)–NE) in the early ToD group and 16.8 months (95% CI = 13.7–19.9) in the late ToD group, corresponding to an HR of an earlier death of 0.42 (95% CI = 0.29–0.60; P < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with the established safety profile, with no new safety signals observed. No significant differences in immune-related adverse events were observed between the two groups. Over the first four cycles, morning circulating CD8+ T cells increased in the early ToD group, whereas they declined in the late ToD group (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the ratio of activated (CD38+ HLA-DR+) versus exhausted (TIM-3+PD-1+) CD8+ T cells was higher in the early ToD group (P < 0.001) compared with the late ToD group (P < 0.001). In summary, our study indicates that early ToD immunochemotherapy substantially improves PFS and OS and is associated with enhanced antitumor CD8+ T cell characteristics compared with late ToD treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05549037.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flowchart of the present study.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: PFS of early vs late ToD treatment group.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: OS of early vs late ToD treatment groups.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Changes in peripheral blood lymphocytes.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Due to concerns regarding patient privacy and institutional data governance, the clinical datasets generated or used in this study are not publicly accessible. To protect the confidentiality of patients, de-identified individual-level data may be made available upon reasonable request. Researchers interested in accessing the data should contact Y.Z. at Hunan Cancer Hospital. All inquiries will be addressed within approximately 10 weeks. Each request will undergo evaluation by the data oversight committee of Hunan Cancer Hospital to assess compliance with confidentiality policies and potential intellectual property constraints.

Change history

  • 19 February 2026

    Editor's Note: The editors are issuing this note to alert readers that concerns have been raised regarding inconsistencies between the registration record of this trial on clinicaltrials.gov and published version the study protocol, as well as with some of the findings in this study. Editorial action will be taken as appropriate once an investigation of the concerns is complete and all parties have been given an opportunity to respond in full.

References

  1. Benjamin, D. J. et al. The role of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncogenic-driven NSCLC: a University of California lung cancer consortium retrospective study. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 3, 100427 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Reck, M., Remon, J. & Hellmann, M. D. First-line immunotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 586–597 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinez, P., Peters, S., Stammers, T. & Soria, J. C. Immunotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 2691–2698 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reck, M. et al. Five-year outcomes with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score >/= 50. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 2339–2349 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, M. Y., Jiang, X. M., Wang, B. L., Sun, Y. & Lu, J. J. Combination therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer: strategies and mechanisms. Pharmacol. Ther. 219, 107694 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, M. L. et al. New promises and challenges in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 404, 803–822 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kisamore, C. O., Elliott, B. D., DeVries, A. C., Nelson, R. J. & Walker, W. H. II Chronotherapeutics for solid tumors. Pharmaceutics 15, 2023 (2023).

  8. Cermakian, N. & Labrecque, N. Regulation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells by the circadian clock. J. Immunol. 210, 12–18 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amiama-Roig, A., Verdugo-Sivianes, E. M., Carnero, A. & Blanco, J. R. Chronotherapy: circadian rhythms and their influence in cancer therapy. Cancers (Basel) 14, 5071 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ince, L. M. et al. Influence of circadian clocks on adaptive immunity and vaccination responses. Nat. Commun. 14, 476 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, C. L., Zhang, X. & Dang, C. V. Clocking cancer immunotherapy responses. Cancer Res. 84, 2756–2758 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian, D. C. et al. Effect of immunotherapy time-of-day infusion on overall survival among patients with advanced melanoma in the USA (MEMOIR): a propensity score-matched analysis of a single-centre, longitudinal study. Lancet Oncol. 22, 1777–1786 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel, J. S. et al. Impact of immunotherapy time-of-day infusion on survival and immunologic correlates in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter cohort analysis. J. Immunother. Cancer 12, e008011 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruiz-Torres, D. A. et al. Immunotherapy time of infusion impacts survival in head and neck cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. Oral Oncol. 151, 106761 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nomura, M. et al. Timing of the infusion of nivolumab for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus influences its efficacy. Esophagus 20, 722–731 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirata, T. et al. Brief report: clinical outcomes by infusion timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 5, 100659 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dizman, N. et al. Association between time-of-day of immune checkpoint blockade administration and outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 21, 530–536 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Landré, T. et al. Effect of immunotherapy-infusion time of day on survival of patients with advanced cancers: a study-level meta-analysis. ESMO Open 9, 102220 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Karaboué, A. et al. Why does circadian timing of administration matter for immune checkpoint inhibitors’ efficacy? Br. J. Cancer 131, 783–796 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cortellini, A. et al. A multicentre study of pembrolizumab time-of-day infusion patterns and clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer: too soon to promote morning infusions. Ann. Oncol. 33, 1202–1204 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rousseau, A. et al. Clinical outcomes by infusion timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 182, 107–114 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goss, G. et al. LBA48 CCTG BR.31: a global, double-blind placebo-controlled, randomized phase III study of adjuvant durvalumab in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann. Oncol. 35, S1238 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Felip, E. et al. Adjuvant atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower010): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 398, 1344–1357 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Brien, M. et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (PEARLS/KEYNOTE–091): an interim analysis of a randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 23, 1274–1286 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, Z. et al. Overall survival according to time-of-day of combined immuno-chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a bicentric bicontinental study. EBioMedicine 113, 105607 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Miao, K. et al. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Front. Immunol. 13, 912180 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Zhou, N., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. Changes in T lymphocyte subsets predict the efficacy of atezolizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. J. Thorac. Dis. 15, 5669–5679 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yost, K. E. et al. Clonal replacement of tumor-specific T cells following PD-1 blockade. Nat. Med. 25, 1251–1259 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, J. et al. Compartmental analysis of T-cell clonal dynamics as a function of pathologic response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 1327–1337 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marcos Rubio, A., Everaert, C., Van Damme, E., De Preter, K. & Vermaelen, K. Circulating immune cell dynamics as outcome predictors for immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 11, e007023 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Spitzer, M. H. et al. Systemic immunity is required for effective cancer immunotherapy. Cell 168, 487–502.e415 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, C. et al. Circadian tumor infiltration and function of CD8+ T cells dictate immunotherapy efficacy. Cell 187, 2690–2702 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fortin, B. M. et al. Circadian control of tumor immunosuppression affects efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Nat. Immunol. 25, 1257–1269 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Riely, G. J. et al. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 4.2024, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 22, 249–274 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kazandjian, D., Gong, Y., Keegan, P., Pazdur, R. & Blumenthal, G. M. Prognostic value of the lung immune prognostic index for patients treated for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 5, 1481–1485 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yeung, C., Kartolo, A., Tong, J., Hopman, W. & Baetz, T. Association of circadian timing of initial infusions of immune checkpoint inhibitors with survival in advanced melanoma. Immunotherapy 15, 819–826 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vilalta, A. et al. 967P The time of anti-PD-1 infusion improves survival outcomes by fasting conditions simulation in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 32, S835 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Seymour, L. et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 18, e143–e152 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Grambsch, P. M. & Therneau, T. M. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81, 515–526 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Steinitz, O., Heller, J., Tsoar, A., Rotem, D. & Kadmon, R. Predicting regional patterns of similarity in species composition for conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1978–1988 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nekola, J. C. & White, P. S. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26, 867–878 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply grateful to all the patients and their families who participated in this study. This work received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 82222048 and 82173338 to Y.Z. and 82003206 to L.Z.). The funding agencies had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.H., L.Z., Z.R. conceived the study, collected the data, contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data, manuscript writing and development of figures and tables. Q.Z. conceived the study, contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data, manuscript writing and development of figures and tables. H. Yan., W.J., Y. Xiong, C.Z., H. Yang, L.L., J. Dai, N.Z., S.X., Y.W., Z.W., J. Deng and X.C. collected the data, contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data and to manuscript review and revision. J.W., H.X., X.L., B.D., G.C. and Y. Xia contributed to all collaborative aspects in the study and critically read and improved the manuscript. C.S. conceived the study, contributed to all study progress and development, contributed to methods, results, interpretation and manuscript writing. F.L. conceived the study, contributed to all study progress and development, contributed to methods, results, interpretation and manuscript writing. N.Y. and Y.Z. codirected this study, including conception, organization, data collection, auditing, supervision, project management, funding acquisition, writing and editing the manuscript. T.M. supervised the study and contributed to the writing, review and editing of the manuscript. Z.H., Z.R., L.Z., Q.Z., Y.Z., F.L., C.S. and T.M. verified the underlying data. All authors approved the current manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tony Mok, Christoph Scheiermann, Francis Lévi, Nong Yang or Yongchang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Benjamin Creelan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Ulrike Harjes, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Distribution of immunotherapy infusion times.

(a) Distribution of first 4 infusion times among 210 patients, who were divided into early time-of-day (ToD) infusion group and late ToD group. (b) Histogram of median times of the first 4 infusions per patient (n = 210).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of patient characteristics.

(a) Forest plots of the univariate and multivariate Cox regression results for progression-free survival (PFS) (n = 210). (b) Forest plots of the univariate and multivariate Cox regression results for overall survival (OS) (n = 210). P values (two-sided), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals of HRs were estimated using univariable or multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and P values were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Data are presented as HR (points) with 95% CIs (horizontal lines). ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor. LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma. LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status. LIPI, Lung Immune Prognostic Index.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Response rates of patients according to ToD treatment group.

The tumor response was assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC) (n = 210). P values were determined using a two-sided chi-square test. ToD, time-of-day. PR, partial response. SD, stable disease. PD, progressive disease.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Dynamic alterations of lymphocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood during immunochemotherapy.

Patient values are normalized to individual baseline levels and assessed after 2 cycles (prior to cycle 3) and 4 cycles (prior to cycle 5) of treatment. Line-point graphs depict dynamic changes of CD3+ T cell proportion (a), CD8+ T cell proportion (b), CD4+ T cell proportion (f), B cell proportion (g), NK cell proportion (h) and CD8+/CD4+ T cell ratio (i) in individual patients from the early and late time-of-day (ToD) groups. Colored lines link sequential measurements from individual patients. The horizontal dotted line represents the normalized baseline (ratio = 1.0). Linear regressions (solid lines) with shaded 95% confidence intervals illustrate changes in CD4+ T cell proportions (c), B cell proportions (d) and NK cell proportions (e) over time in patients from the early and late time-of-day (ToD) groups. Data are presented as mean ± s.e. of the mean (s.e.m.). Dotted horizontal lines indicate the normalized baseline (ratio = 1.0). P values were determined using a permutation test (two-sided) and two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (two-sided), without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Flow cytometric analyses of CD4+, B and NK cells were performed on paired blood samples collected at baseline, after 2 cycles and after 4 cycles from 61 patients in the early ToD group and 44 patients in the late ToD group (n = 105 total patients; n = 315 total samples).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Shifts in peripheral lymphocyte subset composition throughout immunochemotherapy administration.

Representative flow cytometry gating strategy used to identify CD38+HLA-DR+CD8+ T cells and TIM-3+PD-1+CD8+ T cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (a). Linear regressions (solid lines) with shaded 95% confidence intervals illustrate changes in CD38+ HLA-DR+ CD8+ T cell proportions (b). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. Dotted horizontal lines indicate the normalized baseline (ratio = 1.0). P values were determined using a permutation test (two-sided) and two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (two-sided), without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Line-point graphs depict dynamic changes of CD38+ HLA-DR+ CD8+ T cell (c), TIM-3+ PD-1+ CD8+ T cell proportion (d) and CD38+ HLA-DR+/ TIM-3+ PD-1+ CD8+ T cell ratio (e) in individual patients from the early and late time-of-day (ToD) groups. Colored lines connect serial measurements from the same patient. Dotted horizontal lines indicate the normalized baseline (ratio = 1.0). PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Flow cytometric analyses of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T, B and NK cells were performed on paired blood samples collected at baseline, after 2 cycles and after 4 cycles from 61 patients in the early ToD group and 44 patients in the late ToD group (n = 105 total patients; n = 315 total samples). CD38+ HLA-DR+ CD8+ T cells and TIM-3+ PD-1+ CD8+ T cells were assessed in paired cryopreserved PBMCs collected at baseline, after 2 cycles and after 4 cycles from 14 patients in the early ToD group and 25 patients in the late ToD group (n = 39 total patients; n = 117 total samples).

Extended Data Table 1 Information about the clinical trial
Extended Data Table 2 Treatment-related adverse events during all treatments
Extended Data Table 3 Immune-related adverse events during all treatments
Extended Data Table 4 Baseline demographics and disease characteristics of patients included in the flow cytometry analysis by study group

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Zeng, L., Ruan, Z. et al. Time-of-day immunochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med 32, 1233–1240 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04181-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04181-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing