Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparisons of normative references by GAMLSS and HBR framework. | Nature Neuroscience

Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparisons of normative references by GAMLSS and HBR framework.

From: Charting brain morphology in international healthy and neurological populations

Extended Data Fig. 3: Comparisons of normative references by GAMLSS and HBR framework.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a, The normative references fitted by GAMLSS and HBR framework. The units are \(\times {10}^{4}{{mm}}^{3}\) for volume measures, \(\times {10}^{4}{{mm}}^{2}\) for area measure, and \({mm}\) for thickness measure. b, The Z-scores across the site in GAMLSS and HBR fitting (n = 105 sites), the closer the median value to zero, the better the site effects mitigated. c, The classification AUC maps of each paired sites (n = 105 sites). The closer the AUCs to zero, the better the site effects mitigated. Note: GMV, gray matter volume, sGMV, subcortical gray matter volume; WMV, white matter volume; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; GAMLSS, generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape; HBR, hierarchical Bayesian regression; AUC, area under the curve.

Back to article page