Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Trans-ancestry genome-wide analyses of bipolar disorder in East Asian and European populations improve genetic discovery

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of bipolar disorder (BD) have predominantly included individuals of European (EUR) ancestry, underrepresenting non-EUR populations and limiting insight into disease mechanisms. Here we performed a GWAS of BD in Han Chinese individuals (5,164 cases and 13,460 controls) and conducted comparative and integrative analyses with independent East Asian (EAS, 4,479 cases and 75,725 controls) and EUR (59,287 cases and 781,022 controls) cohorts from the PGC4 GWAS. Our GWAS in EAS ancestry identified two genome-wide significant risk loci, including variants at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II region. Incorporating EAS data into trans-ancestry GWAS revealed 93 significant loci (23 novel). Heritability enrichment analyses implicated a variety of neuronal cell types. Multidimensional post-GWAS prioritization identified 39 high-confidence risk genes, of which 15 were differentially expressed in the brains of patients with BD, 12 modulated BD-relevant behaviors in mice and 18 are pharmacologically tractable. This work advances understanding of the biological underpinnings of BD and provides direction for future research in underrepresented populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic overview of data sources and analytic steps.
Fig. 2: Miami plot of Han Chinese GWAS, EAS GWAS and trans-ancestry GWAS.
Fig. 3: Cell type enrichment analyses for BD GWAS.
Fig. 4: Gene prioritization results.
Fig. 5: Differential expression of credible genes between BD cases and controls.
Fig. 6: Potential biological implications of BD credible genes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The genome-wide summary statistics of BD PGC4 GWAS are available via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27216117.v2 (ref. 85). The SNP expression weights of PsychENCODE used in this study are available at http://resource.psychencode.org/. The PsychENCODE cis-eQTL data and the BrainMeta version 2 cis-eQTL data are available via the BrainMeta portal at https://yanglab.westlake.edu.cn/software/smr/#DataResource. The cell-type-specific gene expression matrices from two BICCN studies29,30 for enrichment analysis were downloaded from the CELLxGENE database at https://cellxgene.cziscience.com/collections/bacccb91-066d-4453-b70e-59de0b4598cd and https://cellxgene.cziscience.com/collections/283d65eb-dd53-496d-adb7-7570c7caa443 separately. The summary statistics of BD cross-ancestry meta-analysis are publicly available on the Scientific Data Center of the Kunming Institute of Zoology (https://datacenter.kiz.ac.cn/Home/DataContent?data_gd=4c22800a-d798-169c-7184-430976572334). According to the related policy of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, depositing genetic data (including the summary statistics) of Chinese populations in a third-party website (without application) is not allowed before approval; alternatively, GWAS summary statistics in Chinese populations can be requested from the China National Genomics Data Center (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gvm/), with data accession number GVP000051.

Code availability

No custom code was developed for this study. All software and tools used for the analyses presented are publicly available and referenced within the respective sections in Methods of the article.

References

  1. Merikangas, K. R. et al. Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 241–251 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Craddock, N. & Jones, I. Genetics of bipolar disorder. J. Med. Genet. 36, 585–594 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Connell, K. S. et al. Genomics yields biological and phenotypic insights into bipolar disorder. Nature 639, 968–975 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mullins, N. et al. Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nat. Genet. 53, 817–829 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Koromina, M. et al. Fine-mapping genomic loci refines bipolar disorder risk genes. Nat. Neurosci. 28, 1393–1403 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McClellan, J. M. et al. An evolutionary perspective on complex neuropsychiatric disease. Neuron 112, 7–24 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gurdasani, D., Barroso, I., Zeggini, E. & Sandhu, M. S. Genomics of disease risk in globally diverse populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 520–535 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lam, M. et al. Comparative genetic architectures of schizophrenia in East Asian and European populations. Nat. Genet. 51, 1670–1678 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Z. et al. Genetic architecture of the inflammatory bowel diseases across East Asian and European ancestries. Nat. Genet. 55, 796–806 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishigaki, K. et al. Multi-ancestry genome-wide association analyses identify novel genetic mechanisms in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 54, 1640–1651 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, H. J. et al. Novel risk loci associated with genetic risk for bipolar disorder among Han Chinese individuals: a genome-wide association study and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 78, 320–330 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bulik-Sullivan, B. K. et al. LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Z., Xiao, X., Zhou, W., Zhu, D. & Amos, C. I. False positive findings during genome-wide association studies with imputation: influence of allele frequency and imputation accuracy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 31, 146–155 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bulik-Sullivan, B. et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat. Genet. 47, 1236–1241 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ikeda, M. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies two novel susceptibility loci and trans population polygenicity associated with bipolar disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 639–647 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, F. et al. Deep sequencing of the MHC region in the Chinese population contributes to studies of complex disease. Nat. Genet. 48, 740–746 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jia, X. et al. Imputing amino acid polymorphisms in human leukocyte antigens. PLoS ONE 8, e64683 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Frei, O. et al. Bivariate causal mixture model quantifies polygenic overlap between complex traits beyond genetic correlation. Nat. Commun. 10, 2417 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown, B. C., Asian Genetic Epidemiology Network Type 2 Diabetes Consortium, Ye, C. J., Price, A. L. & Zaitlen, N. Transethnic genetic-correlation estimates from summary statistics. Am. J. Hum. Genet 99, 76–88 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Doan, R. N. et al. Mutations in human accelerated regions disrupt cognition and social behavior. Cell 167, 341–354 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. GTEx Consortium. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Velmeshev, D. et al. Single-cell analysis of prenatal and postnatal human cortical development. Science 382, eadf0834 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Siletti, K. et al. Transcriptomic diversity of cell types across the adult human brain. Science 382, eadd7046 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weissbrod, O. et al. Functionally informed fine-mapping and polygenic localization of complex trait heritability. Nat. Genet. 52, 1355–1363 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Trubetskoy, V. et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature 604, 502–508 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van Bochoven, A. & Posthuma, D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat. Commun. 8, 1826 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, Z. et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat. Genet. 48, 481–487 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Qi, T. et al. Genetic control of RNA splicing and its distinct role in complex trait variation. Nat. Genet. 54, 1355–1363 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Quan, C., Ping, J., Lu, H., Zhou, G. & Lu, Y. 3DSNP 2.0: update and expansion of the noncoding genomic variant annotation database. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D950–D955 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gusev, A. et al. Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 48, 245–252 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hormozdiari, F. et al. Colocalization of GWAS and eQTL signals detects target genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 1245–1260 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. de Leeuw, C. A., Mooij, J. M., Heskes, T. & Posthuma, D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Weeks, E. M. et al. Leveraging polygenic enrichments of gene features to predict genes underlying complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 55, 1267–1276 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gandal, M. J. et al. Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Emani, P. S. et al. Single-cell genomics and regulatory networks for 388 human brains. Science 384, eadi5199 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Koopmans, F. et al. SynGO: an evidence-based, expert-curated knowledge base for the synapse. Neuron 103, 217–234 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cannon, M. et al. DGIdb 5.0: rebuilding the drug-gene interaction database for precision medicine and drug discovery platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1227–D1235 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Savage, J. E. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence. Nat. Genet. 50, 912–919 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Okbay, A. et al. Polygenic prediction of educational attainment within and between families from genome-wide association analyses in 3 million individuals. Nat. Genet. 54, 437–449 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Friligkou, E. et al. Gene discovery and biological insights into anxiety disorders from a large-scale multi-ancestry genome-wide association study. Nat. Genet. 56, 2036–2045 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Watanabe, K. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of insomnia prioritizes genes associated with metabolic and psychiatric pathways. Nat. Genet. 54, 1125–1132 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hatoum, A. S. et al. Genome-wide association study shows that executive functioning is influenced by GABAergic processes and is a neurocognitive genetic correlate of psychiatric disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 59–70 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ward, J. et al. The genomic basis of mood instability: identification of 46 loci in 363,705 UK Biobank participants, genetic correlation with psychiatric disorders, and association with gene expression and function. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 3091–3099 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Thorp, J. G. et al. Symptom-level modelling unravels the shared genetic architecture of anxiety and depression. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1432–1442 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Saunders, A. et al. Molecular diversity and specializations among the cells of the adult mouse brain. Cell 174, 1015–1030 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Duncan, L. E. et al. Mapping the cellular etiology of schizophrenia and complex brain phenotypes. Nat. Neurosci. 28, 248–258 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mertens, J. et al. Differential responses to lithium in hyperexcitable neurons from patients with bipolar disorder. Nature 527, 95–99 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Vreeker, A. et al. High educational performance is a distinctive feature of bipolar disorder: a study on cognition in bipolar disorder, schizophrenia patients, relatives and controls. Psychol. Med. 46, 807–818 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. MacCabe, J. H. et al. Excellent school performance at age 16 and risk of adult bipolar disorder: national cohort study. Br. J. Psychiatry 196, 109–115 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gale, C. R. et al. Is bipolar disorder more common in highly intelligent people? A cohort study of a million men. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 190–194 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sekar, A. et al. Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature 530, 177–183 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hörbeck, E. et al. Dissecting the impact of complement component 4A in bipolar disorder. Brain Behav. Immun. 116, 150–159 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kamitaki, N. et al. Complement genes contribute sex-biased vulnerability in diverse disorders. Nature 582, 577–581 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen, H. et al. Tracing Bai-Yue ancestry in aboriginal Li people on Hainan Island. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac210 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu, S. et al. Genomic analyses from non-invasive prenatal testing reveal genetic associations, patterns of viral infections, and Chinese population history. Cell 175, 347–359 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Forde, A., Hemani, G. & Ferguson, J. Review and further developments in statistical corrections for Winner’s Curse in genetic association studies. PLoS Genet. 19, e1010546 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Anderson, C. A. et al. Data quality control in genetic case−control association studies. Nat. Protoc. 5, 1564–1573 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Delaneau, O., Zagury, J. F., Robinson, M. R., Marchini, J. L. & Dermitzakis, E. T. Accurate, scalable and integrative haplotype estimation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5436 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Delaneau, O., Howie, B., Cox, A. J., Zagury, J. F. & Marchini, J. Haplotype estimation using sequencing reads. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 687–696 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Rubinacci, S., Delaneau, O. & Marchini, J. Genotype imputation using the Positional Burrows Wheeler Transform. PLoS Genet. 16, e1009049 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Genomes Project Consortium et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bahrami, S. et al. Genetic loci shared between major depression and intelligence with mixed directions of effect. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 795–801 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Ge, T., Chen, C. Y., Ni, Y., Feng, Y. A. & Smoller, J. W. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors. Nat. Commun. 10, 1776 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Moore, J. E. et al. Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes. Nature 583, 699–710 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Vorontsov, I. E. et al. Genome-wide map of human and mouse transcription factor binding sites aggregated from ChIP-Seq data. BMC Res. Notes 11, 756 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Girskis, K. M. et al. Rewiring of human neurodevelopmental gene regulatory programs by human accelerated regions. Neuron 109, 3239–3251 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Hubisz, M. J. & Pollard, K. S. Exploring the genesis and functions of Human Accelerated Regions sheds light on their role in human evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 29, 15–21 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Gittelman, R. M. et al. Comprehensive identification and analysis of human accelerated regulatory DNA. Genome Res. 25, 1245–1255 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Sheffield, N. C. & Bock, C. LOLA: enrichment analysis for genomic region sets and regulatory elements in R and Bioconductor. Bioinformatics 32, 587–589 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Skene, N. G. et al. Genetic identification of brain cell types underlying schizophrenia. Nat. Genet 50, 825–833 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Murphy, A. E., Schilder, B. M. & Skene, N. G. MungeSumstats: a Bioconductor package for the standardization and quality control of many GWAS summary statistics. Bioinformatics 37, 4593–4596 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Skene, N. G. & Grant, S. G. Identification of vulnerable cell types in major brain disorders using single cell transcriptomes and expression weighted cell type enrichment. Front. Neurosci. 10, 16 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wojcik, G. L. et al. Genetic analyses of diverse populations improves discovery for complex traits. Nature 570, 514–518 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Wang, D. et al. Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science 362, eaat8464 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Mai, J., Lu, M., Gao, Q., Zeng, J. & Xiao, J. Transcriptome-wide association studies: recent advances in methods, applications and available databases. Commun. Biol. 6, 899 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Stacey, D. et al. ProGeM: a framework for the prioritization of candidate causal genes at molecular quantitative trait loci. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e3 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Hemerich, D. et al. An integrative framework to prioritize genes in more than 500 loci associated with body mass index. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 111, 1035–1046 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Wainberg, M. et al. Opportunities and challenges for transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 51, 592–599 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Zuber, V. et al. Combining evidence from Mendelian randomization and colocalization: Review and comparison of approaches. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 109, 767–782 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Hukku, A., Sampson, M. G., Luca, F., Pique-Regi, R. & Wen, X. Analyzing and reconciling colocalization and transcriptome-wide association studies from the perspective of inferential reproducibility. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 109, 825–837 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Wallace, C. Statistical testing of shared genetic control for potentially related traits. Genet. Epidemiol. 37, 802–813 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Sullivan, P. bip2024. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27216117.v2 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82225016 to Ming Li and 82222024 and U24A20699 to X.X.); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFA1800500 to Ming Li, 2024YFA1803200 to X.X., 2023YFE0119400 to W.Y. and 2023YFC2605400 to S.X.); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82230044 to Y.G., U21A20364 to Z.L., 82330042 to W.Y., 81930033 to Y.F., 32030020 to S.X., 32470649 to Y.L. and 323B2013 to X.T.); the Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (202201AS070048 and 202401AS070080 to Ming Li, 202401AS070084 and 202501AV070009 to X.X. and 202305AH340006 to Y.-G.Y.); the Municipal Key R&D Program of Ningbo (2022Z127 to C.W.); the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (BE2020661 to L.H.); the Spring City Plan: the High-level Talent Promotion and Training Project of Kunming (2022SCP001 to Ming Li); the Shanghai Mental Health Centre Clinical Research Center Major Project (CRC2018ZD02 to Y.F.); the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Program (23JS1410100 to S.X.); the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) ‘Light of West China’ Program (xbzg-zdsys-202312 to X.X. and xbzg-zdsys-202404 to Ming Li); the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (21wm0425008 to N.I.); and the Open Program of Yunnan Key Laboratory of Animal Models and Human Disease Mechanisms (AMHD-2024-2, AMHD-2024-6 and AMHD-2024-8 to Ming Li). X.X. was also supported by the CAS ‘Light of West China’ Program, the CAS Youth Innovation Promotion Association and the Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program Young Talent Project. Ming Li was also supported by the Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program Yunling Scholar Project. PsychENCODE Consortium data were generated as part of the PsychENCODE Consortium. See https://doi.org/10.7303/syn26365932 for a complete list of grants and principal investigators. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Ming Li and X.X. conceived and designed the study. C.-Y.Z. performed most statistical analyses on the GWAS data, with the help of Miao Li and Y.W. P.S., L.H., Y.G., J.-Z.Y., N.Z., X.F., L.G., J.Y., H.-Y.J., Y.-Q.C., S.M., Q.G., Y.S., Y.L., N.Q., X.-Y.Y., L.W., Y.Y., C.W., L.L., D.Z., X.L., X.C., C.Z., J.C., X.S., J.T., J.C., W.F., Wei Tang, Wenxin Tang, W.L., X.T., X.Z., Y.L., C.W., Z.L., S.X., W.Y., Y.F. and F.Z. contributed to sample collections. The GeseDNA Research Team helped with sample collections. N.I., M.I. and T.S. contributed to the data in the Japanese sample. Y.-G.Y. and H.-C.S. helped with all aspects of study design and results interpretation. Ming Li, X.X. and C.-Y.Z. drafted the first version of the paper. All authors revised the paper critically and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yiru Fang, Feng Zhu, Xiao Xiao or Ming Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Neuroscience thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, CY., Li, M., Sun, P. et al. Trans-ancestry genome-wide analyses of bipolar disorder in East Asian and European populations improve genetic discovery. Nat Neurosci 29, 293–305 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-02147-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-02147-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing