Table 3 Species discrimination rates using three barcodes and their combinations based on three methods for native seed plants of the GBA.
Barcodes | BM/BCM (%) | Barcoding gap | Tree-based | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Correct identification | Ambiguous | Incorrect identification | gap (%) | Species identification (%) | |
matK | 63.29 | 27.73 | 8.96 | 46.90 | 43.50 |
rbcL | 56.20 | 37.38 | 6.42 | 35.72 | 31.89 |
ITS2 | 87.60 | 3.02 | 9.36 | 69.72 | 70.87 |
RM | 57.99 | 7.34 | 34.66 | 52.13 | 51.41 |
MI2 | 72.68 | 1.48 | 25.82 | 74.40 | 68.80 |
RI2 | 75.29 | 1.73 | 22.96 | 74.22 | 69.58 |
RMI2 | 67.09 | 1.64 | 31.25 | 76.83 | 71.63 |