Table 5 Summary of 2D versus 3D acquisition methods across the four primary MRI sequences.

From: MU-Glioma Post: A comprehensive dataset of automated MR multi-sequence segmentation and clinical features

 

2D

3D

Count

Percentage

Count

Percentage

T1

219

36.97%

375

63.13%

T1CE

229

38.55%

365

61.45%

T2

593

99.83%

1

0.17%

FLAIR

378

63.64%

216

36.36%

  1. The data shows a preference for 3D acquisition for T1-weighted sequences, while T2-weighted imaging was almost exclusively acquired using 2D methods.
Back to article page