Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Data
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific data
  3. data descriptors
  4. article
Transcriptomic Resource of Trissolcus cultratus: A Key Biological Control Agent for Halyomorpha halys
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Data Descriptor
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 January 2026

Transcriptomic Resource of Trissolcus cultratus: A Key Biological Control Agent for Halyomorpha halys

  • Feng-Qi Li1,
  • Yong-Zhi Zhong2,3,
  • Tim Haye2,4,
  • Francesco Tortorici  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0071-32925,
  • Sofia Victoria Prieto5,
  • Li Wang1,2,
  • Zi-Jian Song2 &
  • …
  • Jin-Ping Zhang2 

Scientific Data , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 628 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Invasive species
  • Molecular evolution

Abstract

Trissolcus cultratus, a parasitoid wasp of brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB), exhibits divergent parasitic capacities between Chinese and Swiss populations, with Chinese strains successfully reproducing on fresh and cold storage host eggs in both laboratory and field conditions, while Swiss strains fail to develop in fresh BMSB egg. We sequenced and assembled the first T. cultratus transcriptome, a total of 184,932,102 and 195,101,432 clean reads from the Chinese and Swiss strains, respectively, were de novo assembled into 19,280 and 16,322 unigenes. These assemblies predicted 9,811 and 9,582 protein-coding genes for the two strains. Among the 19,280 and 16,322 unigenes, we further identified 554 and 557 transcription factors in the Chinese and Swiss strains, respectively. This work presents the first transcriptomic dataset for T. cultratus, offering a valuable foundation for subsequent research on its population genetics.

Similar content being viewed by others

Olfactory responses of Trissolcus mitsukurii to plants attacked by target and non-target stink bugs suggest low risk for biological control

Article Open access 03 February 2022

The stage- and sex-specific transcriptome of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni

Article Open access 07 November 2023

Basal Xenobot transcriptomics reveals changes and novel control modality in cells freed from organismal influence

Article Open access 22 April 2025

Data availability

All datasets generated and analyzed during this study have been deposited in public repositories as follows: 1 Raw sequencing reads for both the Chinese and Swiss T. cultratus populations: NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject ID PRJNA86304619. Final unigene assembly: NCBI GenBank under accession numbers GLGY0000000020 and GLKP0000000021. 2 Transcriptome unigenes files: Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2862377322.

Code availability

The following softwares were used for data analysis:

1. Fastp was used for pre-processing for FastQ files. https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp.

2. FastQC was used for quality control. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.

3. Trinity 2.6.6 was used to de novo transcriptome assembly. https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityrnaseq.

4. Corset version 4.6 13 was used to enhance the final transcriptome dataset. https://github.com/Oshlack/Corset.

5. BUSCO v5.5.0 were used for assessing assembly quality. https://busco.ezlab.org/.

6. KOBAS-i was used for Gene Ontology (GO) functions and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways analysis. http://bioinfo.org/kobas.

7. Transcription factor identification was conducted using the Animal Transcription Factor Database (version 4.0). https://guolab.wchscu.cn/AnimalTFDB4/#/.

8. TransDecoder (3.0.1) 19 was employed to predict the ORFs. https://github.com/TransDecoder/TransDecoder.

9. OrthorFinder v2.5.5 was used to detect orthologous genes among species. https://github.com/davidemms/OrthoFinder.

10. PosiGene v0.1 was used for adaptive evolution analysis. https://github.com/gengit/PosiGene.

11. Salmon version 1.10.1 was used to quantify transcripts. https://github.com/COMBINE-lab/salmon.

12. DESeq 2 software version 2.11.40.8 was used to conduct differential expression analysis. https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html.

References

  1. CABI, E. Halyomorpha halys (2017).

  2. Abram, P. K. et al. Indigenous arthropod natural enemies of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug in North America and Europe. Journal of Pest Science 90, 1009–1020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0891-7 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, J. et al. Seasonal parasitism and host specificity of Trissolcus japonicus in northern China. Journal of Pest Science 90, 1127–1141, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0863-y (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avila, G. A. et al. Seasonal Abundance and Diversity of Egg Parasitoids of Halyomorpha halys in Kiwifruit Orchards in China. Insects 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050428 (2021).

  5. Haye, T., Abdallah, S., Gariepy, T. & Wyniger, D. Phenology, life table analysis and temperature requirements of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys, in Europe. Journal of Pest Science 87, 407–418, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-014-0560-z (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haye, T., Fischer, S., Zhang, J. & Gariepy, T. Can native egg parasitoids adopt the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), in Europe? Journal of Pest Science 88, 693–705, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0671-1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Konopka, J. K. et al. An exotic parasitoid provides an invasional lifeline for native parasitoids. Ecology and evolution 7, 277–284 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haye, T., Zhang, J., Risse, M. & Gariepy, T. D. A temporal trophic shift from primary parasitism to facultative hyperparasitism during interspecific competition between two coevolved scelionid egg parasitoids. Ecology and Evolution 11, 18708–18718 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Talamas, E. J., Buffington, M. L. & Hoelmer, K. Revision of Palearctic Trissolcus Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 3–186 (2017).

  10. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 29, 644–652, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1883 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davidson, N. M. & Oshlack, A. Corset: enabling differential gene expression analysis for de novoassembled transcriptomes. Genome Biology 15, 410, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0410-6 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Finn, R. D. et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D222–230, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1223 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources. Nucleic Acids Research 45, D331–D338, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1108 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shen, W. K. et al. AnimalTFDB 4.0: a comprehensive animal transcription factor database updated with variation and expression annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 51, D39–d45, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac907 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Potter, S. C. et al. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46, W200–w204, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky448 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature Protocols 8, 1494–1512, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.084 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. NCBI Sequence Read Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRP390029 (2025).

  20. Li, F. TSA: Trissolcus cultratus voucher 1 isolate China population, transcriptome shotgun assembly. Genbank. https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:GLGY00000000.1 (2025).

  21. Li, F. TSA: Trissolcus cultratus China population, transcriptome shotgun assembly. Genbank. https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:GLKP00000000.1 (2025).

  22. Li, F. et al. Transcriptomic Resource of Chinese and Swiss Trissolcus cultratus Populations: A Key Biological Control Agent for Halyomorpha halys. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28623773.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Yunnan Province Science and Technology Department–Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Fruit-Vegetable-Flower Invasive Insect Pest Management (Yunnan FVF-PM Joint Lab) (No. 202303AP140018). China’s donation to the CABI Development Fund (VM10051). Francesco Tortorici was supported by the Agritech National Research Center of Italy and received funding from the European Union Next-Generation EU (Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza “PNRR”—Missione 4, Componente 2, Investimento 1.4—D.D. 1032 17/06/2022, CN00000022). Tim Haye and Jin-Ping Zhang received core financial support from CABI and its member countries (see http://www.cabi.org/about-cabi/who-we-work-with/keydonors/ accessed on 1st August 2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Center for R&D of Fine Chemicals of Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China

    Feng-Qi Li & Li Wang

  2. MARA-CABI Joint Laboratory for Bio-Safety, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China

    Yong-Zhi Zhong, Tim Haye, Li Wang, Zi-Jian Song & Jin-Ping Zhang

  3. Anhui-CABI Joint Laboratory for Agricultural Pest Control, Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-products Safety, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, 230031, China

    Yong-Zhi Zhong

  4. CABI, Rue des Grillons 1, 2800, Delemont, Switzerland

    Tim Haye

  5. Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, largo P. Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, Italy

    Francesco Tortorici & Sofia Victoria Prieto

Authors
  1. Feng-Qi Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong-Zhi Zhong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tim Haye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesco Tortorici
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sofia Victoria Prieto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zi-Jian Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jin-Ping Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.Q.L., J.P.Z. and T.H. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.Z.Z., F.T., L.W. and Z.J.S. conducted experiments. F.Q.L., F.T. and S.V.P. analyzed data. All authors contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Ping Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplement tables

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, FQ., Zhong, YZ., Haye, T. et al. Transcriptomic Resource of Trissolcus cultratus: A Key Biological Control Agent for Halyomorpha halys. Sci Data (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06617-5

Download citation

  • Received: 24 March 2025

  • Accepted: 13 January 2026

  • Published: 23 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06617-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Journal Metrics
  • Policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • Submission Guidelines
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Data (Sci Data)

ISSN 2052-4463 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing