Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Data
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific data
  3. data descriptors
  4. article
Global crop suitability datasets for 17 crops under present (2024) and future climate scenarios (2041–2100)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Data Descriptor
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 March 2026

Global crop suitability datasets for 17 crops under present (2024) and future climate scenarios (2041–2100)

  • Tiantian Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-88591,2 &
  • Jinwei Dong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-803X1,2 

Scientific Data , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1951 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Agroecology
  • Climate change
  • Climate-change adaptation
  • Environmental impact
  • Sustainability

Abstract

Accurately assessing crop suitability is essential for ensuring food security and guiding agricultural adaptation to climate change. However, existing suitability analyses are mainly based on empirical rules and coarse-resolution predictors, which limits their representativeness and prevents them from capturing contemporary global agricultural patterns with sufficient spatial detail. Here we propose a transferable novel framework that integrates crop samples from remote sensing-based crop layers and high-resolution environmental predictors to model the global suitability of 17 major crops, using the random forest model under present (2024) and future climate scenarios with a 1 km × 1 km resolution. The models achieve an overall accuracy exceeding 0.9 based on the independent test set. Compared with the Global Agro-edaphic suitability dataset from Global Agro-Ecological Zones-Model (GAEZ), our present suitability results show an improved accuracy, with a global pixel-level correlation coefficient (r) of 0.57, and strong agreement in classified suitability area comparisons (r = 0.99, R² = 0.97). This study offers valuable support for optimizing cropping patterns, enhancing agricultural resilience, and informing climate adaptation strategies.

Similar content being viewed by others

A global dataset for the projected impacts of climate change on four major crops

Article Open access 16 February 2022

Mapping global yields of four major crops at 5-minute resolution from 1982 to 2015 using multi-source data and machine learning

Article Open access 28 February 2025

A 30 m Multi-Year Dataset of Major Crop Distributions in Xinjiang, China (2013–2024) Based on Harmonized Landsat–Sentinel-2 Data

Article Open access 23 March 2026

Data availability

The crop suitability dataset produced in this study is available on Zenodo via the following https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1766672258.

Code availability

The Python code for generating the crop suitability datasets is available for download on Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/17853276).

References

  1. Challinor, A. J. et al. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 287–291 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner, A. S., Maclean, I. M. D., Gaston, K. J. & Bütikofer, L. Forecasting future crop suitability with microclimate data. Agric. Syst. 190, 103084 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gerten, D. et al. Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries. Nat. Sustain. 3, 200–208 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. El Behairy, R. A. et al. Assessment of Soil Capability and Crop Suitability Using Integrated Multivariate and GIS Approaches toward Agricultural Sustainability. Land 11, 1027 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baroudy, A. A. E. et al. Modeling Land Suitability for Rice Crop Using Remote Sensing and Soil Quality Indicators: The Case Study of the Nile Delta. Sustainability 12, 9653 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Akpoti, K., Kabo-bah, A. T. & Zwart, S. J. Agricultural land suitability analysis: State-of-the-art and outlooks for integration of climate change analysis. Agric. Syst. 173, 172–208 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, S., Yu, B. & Zhang, Y. Global concurrent climate extremes exacerbated by anthropogenic climate change. Sci. Adv. 9, eabo1638 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arenas-Castro, S., Gonçalves, J. F., Moreno, M. & Villar, R. Projected climate changes are expected to decrease the suitability and production of olive varieties in southern Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 709, 136161 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Z., Liu, J. & Mo, N. Suitability Assessment System for Cash Crops Production Based on GIS. in 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 884–887, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2006.227 (IEEE, Denver, CO, 2006).

  10. Jahanshiri, E. et al. A Land Evaluation Framework for Agricultural Diversification. Sustainability 12, 3110 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malczewski, J. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overviewq. (2004).

  12. Mugiyo, H. et al. Evaluation of Land Suitability Methods with Reference to Neglected and Underutilised Crop Species: A Scoping Review. Land 10, 125 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. McDowell, R. W. et al. The land use suitability concept: Introduction and an application of the concept to inform sustainable productivity within environmental constraints. Ecol. Indic. 91, 212–219 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Danvi, A., Jütten, T., Giertz, S., Zwart, S. J. & Diekkrüger, B. A spatially explicit approach to assess the suitability for rice cultivation in an inland valley in central Benin. Agric. Water Manag. 177, 95–106 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silva-Gallegos, J. J. et al. Locating Potential Zones for Cultivating Stevia rebaudiana in Mexico: Weighted Linear Combination Approach. Sugar Tech 19, 206–218 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leroux, L. et al. Maize yield estimation in West Africa from crop process-induced combinations of multi-domain remote sensing indices. Eur. J. Agron. 108, 11–26 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. IIASA/FAO. Global Agro-Ecological Zones-Model Documentation (GAEZ v3.0). (2012).

  18. Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Nabiollahi, K., Rasoli, L., Kerry, R. & Scholten, T. Land Suitability Assessment and Agricultural Production Sustainability Using Machine Learning Models. Agronomy 10, 573 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Banai-Kashani, R. A new method for site suitability analysis: The analytic hierarchy process. Environ. Manage. 13, 685–693 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Badr, G. et al. Spatial suitability assessment for vineyard site selection based on fuzzy logic. Precis. Agric. 19, 1027–1048 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ohadi, S., Littlejohn, M., Mesgaran, M., Rooney, W. & Bagavathiannan, M. Surveying the spatial distribution of feral sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and its sympatry with johnsongrass (S. halepense) in South Texas. PLOS ONE 13, e0195511 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beery, S., Cole, E., Parker, J., Perona, P. & Winner, K. Species Distribution Modeling for Machine Learning Practitioners: A Review. in ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) 329–348, https://doi.org/10.1145/3460112.3471966 (ACM, Virtual Event Australia, 2021).

  23. Mockshell, J. & Kamanda, J. Beyond the agroecological and sustainable agricultural intensification debate: Is blended sustainability the way forward? Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 16, 127–149 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Talukdar, S. et al. Coupling geographic information system integrated fuzzy logic-analytical hierarchy process with global and machine learning based sensitivity analysis for agricultural suitability mapping. Agric. Syst. 196, 103343 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zabel, F., Putzenlechner, B. & Mauser, W. Global Agricultural Land Resources – A High Resolution Suitability Evaluation and Its Perspectives until 2100 under Climate Change Conditions. PLoS ONE 9, e107522 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schneider, J. M., Zabel, F. & Mauser, W. Global inventory of suitable, cultivable and available cropland under different scenarios and policies. Sci. Data 9, 527 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., Debaveye, J. & Beernaert, F. Land Evaluation: Part III Crop Requirements. (Agricultural Publications, Brussels: G.A.D.C., 1993).

  28. Chemura, A., Gleixner, S. & Gornott, C. Dataset of the suitability of major food crops in Africa under climate change. Sci. Data 11, 294 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gardner, A. S., Trew, B. T., Maclean, I. M. D., Sharma, M. D. & Gaston, K. J. Wilderness areas under threat from global redistribution of agriculture. Curr. Biol. 33, 4721–4726.e2 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Heumann, B. W., Walsh, S. J., Verdery, A. M., McDaniel, P. M. & Rindfuss, R. R. Land Suitability Modeling Using a Geographic Socio-Environmental Niche-Based Approach: A Case Study from Northeastern Thailand. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 103, 764–784 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ozalp, A. Y. & Akinci, H. Evaluation of Land Suitability for Olive (Olea europaea L.) Cultivation Using the Random Forest Algorithm. Agriculture 13, 1208 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Burchfield, E. K. Shifting cultivation geographies in the Central and Eastern US. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 054049 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Radočaj, D., Jurišić, M., Gašparović, M., Plaščak, I. & Antonić, O. Cropland Suitability Assessment Using Satellite-Based Biophysical Vegetation Properties and Machine Learning. Agronomy 1620, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081620 (2021).

  34. Negussie, K. G., Gebrekidan, B. H., Wyss, D. & Kappas, M. Assessing land suitability for leguminous crops in the okavango river basin: A multicriteria and machine learning approach. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation 135, 104284 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tang, F. H. M. et al. CROPGRIDS: a global geo-referenced dataset of 173 crops. Sci. Data 11, 413 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Potapov, P. et al. Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century. Nat. Food 3, 19–28 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boryan, C., Yang, Z., Mueller, R. & Craig, M. Monitoring US agriculture: the US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer Program. Geocarto Int. 26, 341–358 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Szyniszewska, A. M. CassavaMap, a fine-resolution disaggregation of cassava production and harvested area in Africa in 2014. Sci. Data 7, 159 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. d’Andrimont, R. et al. From parcel to continental scale – A first European crop type map based on Sentinel-1 and LUCAS Copernicus in-situ observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 266, 112708 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mayer, L. et al. The Nippon Foundation—GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project: The Quest to See the World’s Oceans Completely Mapped by 2030. Geosciences 8, 63 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Marthews, T. R., Dadson, S. J., Lehner, B., Abele, S. & Gedney, N. A high-resolution global dataset of topographic index values for use in large-scale hydrological modelling. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 6139–6166 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. FAO & IIASA. Harmonized World Soil Database Version 2.0., https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3823en (FAO; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Rome and Laxenburg, 2023).

  43. Wang, T. et al. High-resolution global soil salinity and sodicity mapping (1980–2024): Box-Cox-based sample optimization, multi-source remote sensing features, and uncertainty quantification. Remote Sens. Environ. 330, 114991 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Miralles, D. G. et al. GLEAM4: global land evaporation and soil moisture dataset at 0.1 resolution from 1980 to near present. Sci. Data 12, 416 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 170122 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Copernicus Climate Change Service. Land cover classification gridded maps from 1992 to present derived from satellite observation. https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.006f2c9a (2021).

  50. Di, Y. et al. Recent soybean subsidy policy did not revitalize but stabilize the soybean planting areas in Northeast China. Eur. J. Agron. 147, 126841 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fu, Y. et al. High-resolution mapping of global winter-triticeae crops using a sample-free identification method. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 95–115 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Mach. Learn. PYTHON 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wadoux, A. M. J.-C., Minasny, B. & McBratney, A. B. Machine learning for digital soil mapping: Applications, challenges and suggested solutions. Earth-Sci. Rev. 210, 103359 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, N. et al. Global Soil Salinity Estimation at 10 m Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing. J. Remote Sens. 4, 0130 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Misra, P. & Yadav, A. S. Improving the Classification Accuracy using Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. 11, 659–665 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Snoek, J., Larochelle, H. & Adams, R. P. Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 25 (2012).

  58. Wang, T. & Dong, J. Global crop suitability datasets for 17 crops under present (2024) and future climate scenarios (2041–2100). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17666722 (2025).

  59. Peng, Q. et al. A twenty-year dataset of high-resolution maize distribution in China. Sci. Data 10, 658 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Remelgado, R. et al. A crop type dataset for consistent land cover classification in Central Asia. Sci. Data 7, 250 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Descals, A. et al. High-resolution global map of smallholder and industrial closed-canopy oil palm plantations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 1211–1231 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Han, J. et al. The RapeseedMap10 database: annual maps of rapeseed at a spatial resolution of 10 m based on multi-source data. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 2857–2874 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Conab. Conab - Mapeamentos Agrícolas. (2025).

  64. Han, J. et al. APRA500: a 500 m annual paddy rice dataset for monsoon Asia using multisource remote sensing data. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5555721 (2021).

  65. Jiang, J. et al. 20m Africa rice distribution map in 2023. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13729353 (2024).

  66. Schneider, M., Schelte, T., Schmitz, F. & Körner, M. EuroCrops: The Largest Harmonized Open Crop Dataset Across the European Union. Sci. Data 10, 612 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mei, Q. et al. ChinaSoyArea10m: a dataset of soybean-planting areas with a spatial resolution of 10 m across China from 2017 to 2021. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 16, 3213–3231 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Song, X.-P. et al. Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 4, 784–792 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zheng, Y., Dos Santos Luciano, A. C., Dong, J. & Yuan, W. High-resolution map of sugarcane cultivation in Brazil using a phenology-based method. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 2065–2080 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hu, J. Mapping 10-m harvested area in the major winter wheat-producing regions of China from 2018 to 2022. Sci. Data 11, 1038 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42271375, 42461144212, 42525108, and 72221002), and the Youth Interdisciplinary Team Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (JCTD-2021-04).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    Tiantian Wang & Jinwei Dong

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    Tiantian Wang & Jinwei Dong

Authors
  1. Tiantian Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinwei Dong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Tiantian Wang designed the experiments, developed the code, conducted result validation and analysis, and drafted the original manuscript. Jinwei Dong provided overall supervision of the study and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinwei Dong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Dong, J. Global crop suitability datasets for 17 crops under present (2024) and future climate scenarios (2041–2100). Sci Data (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06688-4

Download citation

  • Received: 02 June 2025

  • Accepted: 23 January 2026

  • Published: 17 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06688-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Data for crop management

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Journal Metrics
  • Policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • Submission Guidelines
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Data (Sci Data)

ISSN 2052-4463 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene