Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Data
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific data
  3. data descriptors
  4. article
Wealth Composition, Distribution, and Transmission: The Graduate Center Wealth Project Data Warehouse
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Data Descriptor
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 March 2026

Wealth Composition, Distribution, and Transmission: The Graduate Center Wealth Project Data Warehouse

  • Maximilian Longmuir1,
  • Franziska Disslbacher2,
  • Severin Rapp  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0824-23251,
  • Frincasco Di Biase3,4,
  • Giacomo Rella5,
  • Francesca Subioli3,
  • Adam Rego Johnson1,
  • Matteo Targa3,
  • Salvatore Morelli1,3,
  • Manuel Schechtl6,
  • Twisha Asher1,7,
  • Luca Giangregorio3 &
  • …
  • Ignacio Flores3,8 

Scientific Data (2026) Cite this article

  • 2438 Accesses

  • 27 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Economics
  • Social sciences
  • Sociology

Abstract

Private wealth, as well as its distribution and intergenerational transmission have become much-debated issues. However, existing evidence remains fragmented, context-dependent, and sometimes contested. This data descriptor introduces the Graduate Center (GC) Wealth Project data warehouse, a collection of databases covering multiple countries and time periods, designed to address these challenges. The data warehouse consolidates most existing evidence on private wealth and undertakes a significant data harmonization effort. We supplement each data point with extensive metadata on methodology. The data warehouse features an extensive collection of information on the household wealth levels and balance sheets, along with distributional statistics from a wide range of sources. Moreover, it draws together data on wealth transfer tax revenues, and tax features such as rates, exemption thresholds, and tax schedules. The broad range of data sources in the warehouse allows users to assess the degree of heterogeneity of estimates, and how methodological choices affect measurement outcomes. The new data series and policy indicators also allow extending quantitative analysis of wealth and public policy.

Similar content being viewed by others

Global poverty estimation using private and public sector big data sources

Article Open access 07 February 2024

GEOWEALTH-US: Spatial wealth inequality data for the United States, 1960–2020

Article Open access 28 February 2024

Sustainable matrix beyond GDP: investment for inclusive growth

Article Open access 31 January 2024

Data availability

The data warehouse is available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18601154) in comma-separated csv format (file name: warehouse_meta_v1_2_SciDatar1.csv) as well as dta format (file name: warehouse_meta_v1_2_SciDatar1.dta). To review all original raw data sources, users are advised to consult the supplementary source tables (Table S1, S2 and S3). These tables are also available on the Zenodo repository (file names: Supplementary Table S1.xlsx, Supplementary Table S2.xlsx, and Supplementary Table S3.xlsx). We cannot provide the microdata from the HFCS and the LWS. The HFCS data is collected by the European Central Bank (ECB) and provided to researchers through scientific user files by the ECB. The data from the Luxembourg Wealth Study is made available to researchers through the LISSY remote execution system of the Luxembourg Income Study Cross-National Data Center. We construct aggregated secondary data from the existing micro data sets that were legally obtained from the data providers. The secondary data sets are made available with the other source data sets.

Code availability

The replication codes are located in the “Code” subfolder of the Github repository. The main repository features detailed guidance on running the replication code and additional necessary files. This includes the tables that are required to obtain the data provided in the data warehouse from raw data sources (source-specific conceptual grids, conversion tables for historical currencies). Download links for the original source data sets that are used as inputs for the replication code are also provided.

References

  1. Morelli, S. et al. Gc wealth project data warehouse https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18601154 (2024).

  2. Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Zucman, G.World inequality report 2022, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv3006zpt (Harvard University Press, 2022).

  3. Tisch, D. & Schechtl, M. The gender (tax) gap in parental transfers. evidence from administrative inheritance and gift tax data. Socio-Economic Review mwae038. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwae038 (2024).

  4. Alvaredo, F., Berman, Y. & Morelli, S. Evidence from the dead: New estimates of wealth inequality using the distribution of estates https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/a4frb Version 1 (preprint; SocArXiv) (2024).

  5. Morelli, S., Nolan, B., Palomino, J. C. & Van Kerm, P. The influence of inheritances on wealth inequality in rich countries. Journal of Public Economics 247, 105398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105398 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franconi, A. & Rella, G. Monetary policy and the wealth distribution. Working Paper, Chaire de recherche sur les enjeux économiques intergénérationnels, ESG UQAM https://creei.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/cahier_25_04_monetary_policy_wealth_distribution.pdf (2025).

  7. Morelli, S. et al. The gc wealth project. Tech. Rep., Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pwm2e (2024).

  8. LIS. Luxembourg Wealth Study Database. https://www.lisdatacenter.org/our-data/lws-database/.

  9. Household Finance and Consumption Network. The Household Finance and Consumption Survey: Methodological report for the 2021 wave. ECB Statistics Paper Series 45, European Central Bank https://doi.org/10.2866/970554 (2023).

  10. Alstadsæter, A., Johannesen, N. & Zucman, G. Who owns the wealth in tax havens? macro evidence and implications for global inequality. Journal of Public Economics 162, 89–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.008 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vellutini, C., Casamatta, G., Bousquet, L. & Poniatowski, G. Estimating international tax evasion by individuals. Taxation Paper 76, European Commission’s Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union https://doi.org/10.2778/300732 (2019).

  12. OECD. Households’ financial assets and liabilities https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=QASA_7HH. OECD Statistics (2021).

  13. Acciari, P., Alvaredo, F. & Morelli, S. The concentration of personal wealth in Italy 1995–2016. Journal of the European Economic Association https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvae002 (2024).

  14. Advani, A., Bangham, G. & Leslie, J. The UK’s wealth distribution and characteristics of high-wealth households. Fiscal Studies 42, 397–430, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12286 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Albers, T. N. H., Bartels, C. & Schularick, M. Wealth and its distribution in Germany, 1895-2018. Working Paper 9739, CESifo https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4103952 (2022).

  16. Alvaredo, F. & Saez, E. Income and wealth concentration in Spain in a historical and fiscal perspective. In Atkinson, A. B. & Piketty, T. (eds.) Top Incomes: A Global Perspective, chap. 10, 482–559 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2010).

  17. Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A. B. & Morelli, S. Top wealth shares in the UK over more than a century. Journal of Public Economics 162, 26–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.02.008 (2018). Special issue: honoring the work of Sir Anthony B. Atkinson (1944–2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anand, I. & Kumar, R. The sky and the stratosphere: Wealth concentration in india during the last (lost) decade. Review of Income and Wealth 70, 747–765, https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12661 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Assouad, L. Rethinking the Lebanese economic miracle: The extreme concentration of income and wealth in lebanon 2005-2014. Working Paper 2017/13, World Inequality Lab https://wid.world/document/rethinking-lebanese-economic-miracle-extreme-concentration-income-wealth-lebanon-2005-2014-wid-world-working-paper-201713/ (2021).

  20. Batty, M. et al. Introducing the Distributional Financial Accounts of the United States. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-017, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2019.017 (2019).

  21. Batty, M. et al. The Distributional Financial Accounts of the United States. In Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Gornick, J. C., Johnson, B. & Kennickell, A. (eds.) Measuring Distribution and Mobility of Income and Wealth, 641–677, https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/measuring-distribution-and-mobility-income-and-wealth/distributional-financial-accounts-united-states. Chapter 22 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2022).

  22. Bharti, N. K. Wealth inequality, class and caste in India, 1961–2012. WID.World Working Paper 2018/14, World Inequality Database https://wid.world/document/n-k-bharti-wealth-inequality-class-and-caste-in-india-1961-2012/ (2018).

  23. Blanchet, T. & Martínez-Toledano, C. Wealth inequality dynamics in Europe and the United States: Understanding the determinants. Journal of Monetary Economics 133, 25–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.11.010 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brandolini, A., Cannari, L., D’Alessio, G. & Faiella, I. Household wealth distribution in Italy in the 1990s. In Wolff, E. N. (ed.) International Perspectives on Household Wealth, chap. 7, 225–275, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847203175.00015 (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2006).

  25. Bricker, J., Henriques, A., Krimmel, J. & Sabelhaus, J. Measuring income and wealth at the top using administrative and survey data. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Spring, 261–331, https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2016.0016 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bricker, J., Henriques, A. & Hansen, P. How much has wealth concentration grown in the United States? A re-examination of data from 2001-2013. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2018-024, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2018.024 (2018).

  27. Bricker, J., Goodman, S., Moore, K. B. & Volz, A. H. A wealth of information: Augmenting the survey of consumer finances to characterize the full U.S. wealth distribution. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2021-053, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2021.053 (2021).

  28. Cannari, L. & D’Alessio, G. Wealth inequality in Italy: A reconstruction of 1968-1975 data and a comparison with recent estimates. Rivista di Storia Economica XXXIV, 357–396 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Catherine, S., Miller, M. & Sarin, N. Social security and trends in wealth inequality. The Journal of Finance 80, 1497–1531, https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13440 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chatterjee, A., Czajka, L. & Gethin, A. Wealth inequality in South Africa, 1993–2017. The World Bank Economic Review 36, 19–36, https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhab012 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Credit Suisse. Credit Suisse global wealth report. https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us/en/reports-research/global-wealth-report.html.

  32. Davies, J. B. & Di Matteo, L. Long run Canadian wealth inequality in international context. Review of Income and Wealth 67, 134–164, https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12453 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dell, F., Piketty, T. & Saez, E. Income and wealth concentration in Switzerland over the twentieth century. In Atkinson, A. B. & Piketty, T. (eds.) Top Incomes over the Twentieth Century: A Contrast between Continental European and English-speaking Countries https://global.oup.com/academic/product/top-incomes-over-the-twentieth-century-9780198727750?lang=en&cc=us (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007).

  34. Easton, B.Income Distribution in New Zealand. No. 28 in https://natlib.govt.nz/records/21732544?search%5Bi%5D%5Bcreator%5D=Easton%2C+B.+H.&search%5Bi%5D%5Bsubject%5D=Income+distribution+--+New+Zealand&search%5Bpath%5D=items (New Zealand Institute of Economic Research, Wellington, New Zealand, 1983).

  35. Frick, J. R., Grabka, M. M. & Hauser, R.Die verteilung der vermögen in Deutschland: empirische analysen für personen und haushalte, vol. 118 of Forschung aus der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung (HBS) https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845269412 (Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, Germany, 2010).

  36. Garbinti, B., Goupille-Lebret, J. & Piketty, T. Accounting for wealth-inequality dynamics: Methods, estimates, and simulations for France. Journal of the European Economic Association 19, 620–663, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaa025 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Iacono, R. & Palagi, E. A micro perspective on r  > g. Economica 90, 531–556, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12464 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jacobs, L., Llanes, E., Moore, K., Thompson, J. & Volz, A. H. Wealth concentration in the USA using an expanded measure of net worth. Oxford Economic Papers https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpab054. Gpab054 (2021).

  39. Jakobsen, K., Jakobsen, K., Kleven, H. & Zucman, G. Wealth taxation and wealth accumulation: Theory and evidence from Denmark. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 135, 329–388, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz032 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Katic, P. & Leigh, A. Top wealth shares in Australia 1915–2012. Review of Income and Wealth 62, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12177 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kim, N. N. Wealth inequality in Korea, 2000–2013: Evidence from inheritance tax statistics. Journal of the Korean Welfare State and Social Policy 2, 26–57 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kitao, S. & Yamada, T. Dimensions of inequality in Japan: Distributions of earnings, income and wealth between 1984 and 2014. CAMA Working Paper 36/2019, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis https://cama.crawford.anu.edu.au/publication/cama-working-paper-series/14348/dimensions-inequality-japan-distributions-earnings (2019).

  43. Kopczuk, W. & Saez, E. Top wealth shares in the United States, 1916–2000: Evidence from estate tax returns. National Tax Journal 57, 445–487, https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.2S.05 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kuhn, M., Schularick, M. & Steins, U. I. Income and wealth inequality in America, 1949–2016. Journal of Political Economy 128, 3469–3519, https://doi.org/10.1086/708815 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lundberg, J. & Waldenström, D. Wealth inequality in Sweden: What can we learn from capitalized income tax data? Review of Income and Wealth 64, 517–541, https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12294 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Martínez-Toledano, C. House price cycles, wealth inequality and portfolio reshuffling. WID.World Working Paper Series 2020/2 https://wid.world/document/house-price-cycles-wealth-inequality-and-portfolio-reshuffling-wid-world-working-paper-2020-02/. Unpublished manuscript (2022).

  47. Novokmet, F., Piketty, T. & Zucman, G. From Soviets to oligarchs: Inequality and property in Russia 1905-2016. Journal of Economic Inequality 16, 189–223, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-018-9383-0 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. OECD. Wealth Distribution Database https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=WEALTH. OECD Statistics (2021).

  49. Piketty, T. & Yang, L. Income and wealth inequality in Hong Kong, 1981–2020: The rise of pluto-communism? The World Bank Economic Review 36, 803–834, https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhac019 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Piketty, T., Postel-Vinay, G. & Rosenthal, J.-L. Wealth concentration in a developing economy: Paris and France, 1807–1994. American Economic Review 96, 236–256, https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157614 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Piketty, T., Yang, L. & Zucman, G. Capital accumulation, private property, and rising inequality in China, 1978–2015. American Economic Review 109, 2469–2496, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170973 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Roine, J. & Waldenström, D. Wealth concentration over the path of development: Sweden, 1873–2006. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111, 151–187, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.01558.x (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Roine, J. & Waldenström, D. Long-run trends in the distribution of income and wealth. In Atkinson, A. B. & Bourguignon, F. (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 2, chap. 7, 469–592, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59428-0.00008-4 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2015).

  54. Saez, E. & Zucman, G. Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131, 519–578, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw004 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Saez, E. & Zucman, G. Progressive wealth taxation. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity Fall, 437–533, https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2019.0017 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Saez, E. & Zucman, G. The rise of income and wealth inequality in America: Evidence from distributional macroeconomic accounts. Journal of Economic Perspectives 34, 3–26, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.4.3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Saez, E. & Zucman, G. Trends in US income and wealth inequality: Revising after the revisionists. Working Paper 27921, National Bureau of Economic Research https://doi.org/10.3386/w27921 (2020).

  58. Salverda, W. Top incomes, income and wealth inequality in the Netherlands: The first 100 years 1914–2014 – what’s next? WID.World Working Paper 2019/02, World Inequality Database https://wid.world/document/top-incomes-income-and-wealth-inequality-in-the-netherlands-the-first-100-years-1914-2014-whats-next-wid-world-wp-2-2019/ (2019).

  59. Smith, M., Zidar, O. & Zwick, E. Top wealth in America: New estimates under heterogeneous returns. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 138, 515–573, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjac033 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Targa, M. & Yang, L. The impact of Communist Party membership on wealth distribution and accumulation in urban China. World Development 181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106660. 106660 (2024).

  61. Toussaint, S. J., de Vicq, A., Moatsos, M. & van der Valk, T. Household wealth and its distribution in the Netherlands, 1854-2019. Working Paper 2022/19, World Inequality Lab https://wid.world/document/household-wealth-and-its-distribution-in-the-netherlands-1854-2019-world-inequality-lab-working-paper-2022-19/ (2022).

  62. van Bavel, B. & Frankema, E. Wealth inequality in the Netherlands, c. 1950-2015. the paradox of a northern European welfare state. TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History 14, 29–62, https://doi.org/10.18352/tseg.916 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. von Fintel, D. & Orthofer, A. Wealth inequality and financial inclusion: Evidence from South African tax and survey records. Economic Modelling 91, 568–578, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.001 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wolff, E. N. Household wealth trends in the United States, 1962 to 2016: Has middle class wealth recovered? Working Paper 24085, National Bureau of Economic Research https://doi.org/10.3386/w24085 (2017).

  65. Wolff, E. N. Household wealth trends in the United States, 1962 to 2019: Median wealth rebounds... but not enough. Working Paper 28383, National Bureau of Economic Research https://doi.org/10.3386/w28383 (2021).

  66. Zucman, G. Global wealth inequality. Annual Review of Economics 11, 109–138, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-025852 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Suss, J., Kemeny, T. & Connor, D. S. Geowealth-us: spatial wealth inequality data for the united states, 1960–2020. Scientific Data 11, 253, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03059-9 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  68. OECD Statistics. Revenue statistics - OECD countries: Comparative tables. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=REV.

  69. Crowe Horwath International. International Master Tax Guide 2009/10 https://books.google.com/books?id=V3XxLzh78WwC&pg=PA640&lpg=PA640&dq=FR+inheritance+tax+allowance+%222009%22&source=bl&ots=9CfAfGTYwE&sig=ACfU3U3ohJBuUlzJwTDomyLQsqB7pqstvQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiQn5ezgPXnAhXWUhUIHX35CswQ6AEwDXoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=FR%20inheritance%20tax%20allowance%20%222009%22&f=false (CCH Australia Limited, Australia, 2009).

  70. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Revenue Act of 1940 with explanation and federal tax charts. New York https://hdl.handle.net/2027/nnc1.cu04284690 (1940).

  71. Ernst & Young. The global executive https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2006-07.pdf (2006).

  72. Ernst & Young. The global executive https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2007-08.pdf (2007).

  73. Ernst & Young. The 2008 global executive: Individual tax, social security and immigration https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2008-09.pdf (2008).

  74. Ernst & Young. The 2009 global executive: Individual tax, social security and immigration https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2009-10.pdf (2009).

  75. Ernst & Young. The 2010 global executive: Individual tax, social security and immigration https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2010-11.pdf (2010).

  76. Ernst & Young. The 2011 global executive: Individual tax, social security and immigration https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2011-12.pdf (2011).

  77. Ernst & Young. International estate and inheritance tax guide 2012, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2012.pdf (2011).

  78. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax guide: Income tax, social security and immigration 2012–2013, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2012-13.pdf (2012).

  79. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax guide: Income tax, social security and immigration 2013–2014, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2013-14.pdf (2013).

  80. Ernst & Young. International estate and inheritance tax guide 2013, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2013.pdf (2013).

  81. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax guide: Income tax, social security and immigration 2014–15, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2014-15.pdf (2014).

  82. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2014 https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2014.pdf (2014).

  83. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax guide: Income tax, social security and immigration 2015–16, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2015-16.pdf (2015).

  84. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2015, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2015.pdf (2015).

  85. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2016, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2016.pdf (2016).

  86. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax and immigration guide 2016–17, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2016-17.pdf (2016).

  87. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2017, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2017.pdf (2017).

  88. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax and immigration guide 2017–18, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2017-18.pdf (2017).

  89. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2018, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2018.pdf (2018).

  90. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax and immigration guide 2018–19, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/worldwide-personal-tax-guide-2018-19.pdf (2018).

  91. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2019, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/ey-2019-worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide.pdf (2019).

  92. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax and immigration guide 2019–20, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/ey-2019-20-worldwide-personal-tax-and-immigration-guide.pdf (2019).

  93. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2020, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/ey-2020-worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide.pdf (2020).

  94. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax and immigration guide 2020–21, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/ey-worldwide-personal-tax-and-immigration-guide-4-february-2021.pdf (2021).

  95. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2021, https://bibbase.org/f/nKAPSyp34A9azBzJd/ErnstYoung2021_WorldwideEstateInheritanceTaxGuide.pdf (2021).

  96. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax and immigration guide 2021–22, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax/documents/ey-personal-tax-and-immigration-guide-11-mar-22.pdf (2022).

  97. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2022, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-us/campaigns/documents/ey-worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2022.pdf (2022).

  98. Ernst & Young. Worldwide estate and inheritance tax guide 2023, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-us/services/tax/documents/ey-worldwide-estate-and-inheritance-tax-guide-2023.pdf (2023).

  99. Ernst & Young. Worldwide personal tax and immigration guide 2022–23, https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/tax-guides/documents/ey-personal-tax-immigration-guide-05-april-2023.pdf (2023).

  100. The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. Tax manual of the Federal Revenue Act of 1942 and prior laws illustrating their effect on life insurance, endowments and annuities. Philadelphia https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/100925023. Second printing (1943).

  101. The Chase National Bank of the City of New York. The Revenue Act of 1935 and digest of new provisions. New York https://hdl.handle.net/2027/nnc1.cu04284607 (1935).

  102. Walczak, J. State inheritance and estate taxes: Rates, economic implications, and the return of interstate competition. Special Report 235, Tax Foundation https://taxfoundation.org/state-inheritance-estate-taxes-economic-implications/ (2017).

  103. OECD. Inheritance Taxation in OECD Countries. No. 28 in OECD Tax Policy Studies https://doi.org/10.1787/e2879a7d-en (OECD Publishing, Paris, 2021).

  104. Huffman, E. W. G.Comparison of the Revenue Acts of 1932 and 1934, https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.b5013299 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1934).

  105. United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Coordination of State and Federal Inheritance, Estate, and Gift Taxes: A Commission Report https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1458/ (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1961).

  106. United States Internal Revenue. Law and regulations relating to the estate tax. Regulations 37, U.S. Government Printing Office https://www.google.com/books/edition/Law_and_Regulations_Relating_to_the_Esta/Dw7ZAAAAMAAJ (1917).

  107. Copenhagen Economics. Attachment: Survey of the domestic rules on taxes levied upon death https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011SC1489&from=EN. Annex 4 from European Commission report SEC(2011) 1489 (2011).

  108. Jacobson, D. B., Raub, B. G. & Johnson, B. W. The estate tax: Ninety years and counting. Statistics of Income Bulletin 27, 118–128 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Drometer, M. et al. Wealth and inheritance taxation: An overview and country comparison. ifo DICE Report 16, 45–54 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Kley, V.The Taxation of Capitalistic Bequests. Ph.D. thesis, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7136-4. Gabler Verlag (2012).

  111. Lin, J., Mangan, J. & Milosavljevic, F. Back from the dead: Australian inheritance tax https://aibe.uq.edu.au/project/back-dead-australian-inheritance-tax. Australian Institute for Business and Economics (2018).

  112. Luzkow, J. L. The politics of taxes. In Monopoly Restored: How the Super-Rich Robbed Main Street, chap. 6, 187–239, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93994-0_6 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).

  113. Piketty, T. On the long-run evolution of inheritance: France 1820–2050. The quarterly journal of economics 126, 1071–1131, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr020 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Piketty, T. Capital and Ideology http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/fr/ideology (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2020).

  115. Plagge, A., Scheve, K. & Stasavage, D. Comparative inheritance taxation database http://hdl.handle.net/10079/mkkwhm7. ISPS Data Archive (2010).

  116. Profeta, P., Scabrosetti, S. & Winer, S. L. Wealth transfer taxation: An empirical investigation. International Tax and Public Finance 21, 720–767, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-014-9325-0 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Schinke, C. Inheritance in Germany 1911 to 2009: A mortality multiplier approach. SOEPpaper 462, SOEP — The German Socio-Economic Panel Study at DIW Berlin http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2131208 (2012).

  118. Genschel, P. & Seelkopf, L. Tax introduction database http://tid.seelkopf.eu/tidData.php. European University Institute (2019).

  119. White, C. P. The effect of the 80 per cent credit clause of the federal estate tax law on state inheritance tax laws. Journal of Political Economy 36, 625–633 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Henrekson, M. & Stenkula, M. (eds.) Swedish Taxation: Developments since 1862, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478153 (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2015).

  121. Pierson, K., Hand, M. & Thompson, F. The government finance database: A common resource for quantitative research in public financial analysis https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130119 (2015).

  122. Chakraborty, R., Kavonius, I. K., Pérez-Duarte, S. & Vermeulen, P. Is the top tail of the wealth distribution the missing link between the household finance and consumption survey and national accounts? Journal of official Statistics 35, 31–65, https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-000 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Vermeulen, P. How fat is the top tail of the wealth distribution? Review of Income and Wealth 64, 357–387, https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12279 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project underwent approximately five years of development before its launch, in July 2023, and many individuals contributed to varying degrees, during multiple stages, and to different sections of the project. First, the project would not exist without the continuous, reliable, and professional support of the Stone Center, including its director Janet Gornick, and the staff, Carolyn Fisher, Mei-Ling Israel, Jennifer Kitses, Veronica Ordaz, and Saraya McPherson. We also acknowledge the support from the Law Department of the University of Roma Tre, including the director Antonio Carratta, as well as the admin staff Giuseppina Santilli, Alessia Cantarella, Riccardo D’Alfonso, Alessio Fiorentini, Federico Melograno, and Michele Sancioni. The professional organizational and communication support from Ylenia Sina is also acknowledged. Facundo Alvaredo, Charlotte Bartels, Yonatan Berman, Miles Corak, Philipp Erfurth, Josep Espasa Reig, Giacomo Gabbuti, Janet Gornick, Demetrio Guzzardi, Elena Granaglia, Joe Hasell, Roberto Iacono, Rama Dasi Mariani, Leslie McCall, Branko Milanovic, Teresa Munzi, Jörg Neugschwender, Brian Nolan, Juan Palomino, Piotr Paradowski, Alberto Pozzolo, Marco Ranaldi, Antonio Scialà, and Philippe Van Kerm provided invaluable feedback at different stages of development of the project. Regarding the Wealth Topography database, Goncalo Costa conceptualized the database and initiated the data-gathering effort. We thank Ana Rojas Silvero for providing essential support in collecting and systematizing raw data sources on household balance sheets. Our thanks also go to Marco Ranaldi, Yaoqi Lin, and Pranabes Probeshika Dutta for their support with the initial data gathering. For the Wealth Inequality Trends section, Ercio Muñoz carried out the foundational work by gathering the initial dataset. We are indebted to Tony Shorrocks for sharing Credit Suisse data. Early contributions from Carolyn Fisher and Ian Haberman were important in completing and optimizing the structure of the methodological tables, as well as providing details for specific sources. Thanks also to Philipp Erfurth for his valuable feedback during the early stages of the process. Irene Toma, joined the project in 2025 leading the data and conceptual expansion in the context of low and lower-middle income countries. Mei Li, Nolan Lyons, Yue Pan, Alex Parton, Sarah Russo, Jack Shea, and Tsu Zhu contributed to the EIG Taxes section trough outstanding research assistance. Martino Kuntze, Ali Jehanzaib, and Ghulam Shabir, did excellent work in supporting the systematization of data in relevant sources and debugging of the EIG taxes database. Josemaria Loria, Margherita Di Chiacchio, and Samuele Guerrini made further valuable contributions to the EIG Taxes section as research assistants. This work was financially supported by the Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality at The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY).Salvatore Morelli acknowledges financial support from the grant PRIN2022 (Prot. 2022HLKRTJ) - “Wealth, income, and consumption inequality after COVID-19 - CUPF53D23003070001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality at CUNY Graduate Center, New York, USA

    Maximilian Longmuir, Severin Rapp, Adam Rego Johnson, Salvatore Morelli & Twisha Asher

  2. Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna, Austria

    Franziska Disslbacher

  3. Roma Tre University, Department of Law, Rome, Italy

    Frincasco Di Biase, Francesca Subioli, Matteo Targa, Salvatore Morelli, Luca Giangregorio & Ignacio Flores

  4. Department of Economics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Frincasco Di Biase

  5. Université du Québec à Montréal, School of Managment (ESG UQAM), Montreal, Canada

    Giacomo Rella

  6. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Public Policy, North Carolina, USA

    Manuel Schechtl

  7. The Graduate Center - CUNY, New York, USA

    Twisha Asher

  8. Paris School of Economics, Paris, France

    Ignacio Flores

Authors
  1. Maximilian Longmuir
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franziska Disslbacher
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Severin Rapp
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frincasco Di Biase
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giacomo Rella
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Francesca Subioli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Adam Rego Johnson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Matteo Targa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Salvatore Morelli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Manuel Schechtl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Twisha Asher
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Luca Giangregorio
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ignacio Flores
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the article and the dataset. The author ordering is random using the American Economic Association’s Author Randomization tool. The register entry confirmation code is RstOC1m7lbWE. Salvatore Morelli, the GC Wealth Project Director, coordinates the large team between New York and Rome and guides and oversees the development, expansion, and refinement of the data warehouse as well as the associated research projects. The development of methodological tables to supplement the inequality trends series was carried out by Salvatore Morelli, with the support of others as detailed below. Giacomo Rella led the development of the Wealth Topography database, and worked on the conceptualization, the design of the data architecture, the national accounting mapping, the automation of data gathering, and the design of the detailed metadata complementing the database. Max Longmuir followed Giacomo Rella in the development of the Wealth Topography database and worked on the conceptualization, the design of the data architecture, the national accounting mapping, the automation of data gathering, and the design of the detailed metadata complementing the database. Severin Rapp is now leading the Topography section and overseeing the future expansion of the section. Frincasco Di Biase carried out the foundational work by gathering the initial dataset for the Wealth Inequality Trends section. He also assisted in the development of methodological tables to supplement the inequality trends series. Franziska Disslbacher oversaw the development of the Wealth Inequality Trends database in 2022 and part of 2023, and contributed to the establishment of automation processes. She contributed to the creation of the estimates of the wealth inequality trends series using cross-national survey databases. She also assisted in the development of methodological tables to supplement the inequality trends series, and worked on the completion and optimization the structure of the methodological tables. Moreover, she provided details for specific sources. Matteo Targa took over Franziska’s role in 2023 and developed a quality management routine for the Wealth Inequality Trends database. He contributed to the creation of the estimates of wealth inequality trends series using cross-national survey databases. Matteo is responsible for the management, update, expansion, and streamlining process of the inequality trends section. He also assisted in the development of methodological tables to supplement the Inequality Trends section. Adam Rego Johnson had a pivotal role in establishing compilation standards and manuals for the Wealth Inequality Trends database. He also contributed significantly through editing, proofreading, and classifying the methodological tables. Adam played an important role in the reference management and the creation of the Digital Library of Research on Wealth Inequality and the Data Sources Library. Twisha Asher collected and classified tax policy specifications and researched a wealth of data on wealth transfer taxation and shaped the Estate, Inheritance, and Gift (EIG) Taxes section fundamentally. She also played a decisive role in supporting the design and documentation of the EIG database structure. Moreover, she continued to streamline the data collection and improve the code that assembles the database in collaboration with others. Twisha Asher also supervised research assistants working on wealth transfer taxation. She helped with completing and optimizing the structure of the methodological tables in the Wealth Inequality Trends database, and provided details for specific sources. Ignacio Flores had a crucial role in supervising the overall architecture of the data warehouse. His oversight was vital for the integration of different elements of the data warehouse, such that the data is cohesively and logically structured. He also helped to improve the code that assembles the EIG Taxes database, and streamlined the data collection in collaboration with others. Ignacio Flores also contributed to the creation of the estimates of wealth inequality trends series using cross-national survey databases. Ignacio has been further contributing to the project with the design of a new website visualization architecture. Manuel Schechtl made important contributions to the the EIG Taxes section, assuming oversight of the EIG database from December 2022 through July 2024. Manuel Schechtl contributed to improving the code that assembles the database and streamlining the data collection, and supervised research assistants working on wealth transfer taxation. Francesca Subioli started to work with Manuel on the supervision and the development of the tax section (early 2023), which she is leading together with Luca since 2024. She improved the coding structure, implemented a completely new and more efficient architecture of the EIG section, and laid the groundwork for the future database expansion. She also supervised research assistants working on wealth transfer taxation. Luca Giangregorio started to work with Manuel and Francesca in late 2023 on the supervision and the development of the tax section. Both Luca and Francesca carried out substantial improvements in the the coding structure of the EIG tax section, implemented a completely new and more efficient architecture of the database, and laid the groundwork for the future database expansion. e also supervised research assistants working on wealth transfer taxation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore Morelli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table S1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Table S2 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Table S3 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Longmuir, M., Disslbacher, F., Rapp, S. et al. Wealth Composition, Distribution, and Transmission: The Graduate Center Wealth Project Data Warehouse. Sci Data (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-07105-6

Download citation

  • Received: 26 September 2025

  • Accepted: 19 March 2026

  • Published: 31 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-07105-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Journal Metrics
  • Policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • Submission Guidelines
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Data (Sci Data)

ISSN 2052-4463 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing