Table 4 Neurocognitive variables as predictors of clutter underreporting (CIR-error).

From: Anosognosia in hoarding disorder is predicted by alterations in cognitive and inhibitory control

Neurocognitive Variables (N = 53)

As predictor of CIR-error

β

pa

Finger Tapping speed

0.008

0.759

Go/No-Go reaction time

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.032

0.627

Go/No-Go false alarm (no-go) errors

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.071

0.051

Go/No-Go false miss (go) errors

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.049

0.088

Go/No-Go total errors

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.115

0.002*

ContinuousĀ Performance reaction time

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.016

0.575

ContinuousĀ Performance false alarm errors

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.007

0.782

ContinuousĀ Performance false miss errors

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.046

0.089

Switching of Attention completion time

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.063

0.076

Switching of Attention errors

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.046

0.232

Choice reaction time

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.017

0.657

Memory Recognition immediate recall

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.019

0.654

Memory Recognition delayed recall

0.020

0.440

Digit Span

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.013

0.684

Maze completion time

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.015

0.658

Maze total errors

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.006

0.833

Verbal InterferenceĀ color word reading errors

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.028

0.664

Verbal Interference color word reading reaction time

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.067

0.092

Verbal InterferenceĀ ink color naming errors

0.041

0.319

Verbal InterferenceĀ ink color naming reaction time

0.004

0.907

Stroop interference by errors (ink colorĀ naming – colorĀ word reading errors)

0.043

0.250

Stroop interference by reaction time (ink colorĀ naming – colorĀ word reading reaction times)

0.128

0.010

  1. ap values < .0.05 are indicated in bold text.
  2. *Meets Bonferroni-corrected alpha threshold of p < 0.003.