Abstract
Nonlinear qubit master equations have recently been shown to exhibit rich dynamical phenomena such as period doubling, Hopf bifurcation, and strange attractors usually associated with classical nonlinear systems. Here we investigate nonlinear qubit models that support tunable Lorenz attractors. A Lorenz qubit could be realized experimentally by combining qubit torsion, generated by real or simulated mean field dynamics, with linear amplification and dissipation. This would extend engineered Lorenz systems to the quantum regime, allowing for their direct experimental study and possible application to quantum information processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Several recent papers1,2,3,4,5,6,7 have considered nonlinear generalizations of the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GKSL) master equation8,9 for qudits. The superoperators resulting from these evolutions each take the form of a positive trace-preserving (PTP) channel10,11 \(X \mapsto \phi (X)/\textrm{tr}[\phi (X)]\), with X a density matrix and \(\phi \) a positive map. The positivity of this normalized PTP channel follows from the positivity of \(\phi \) and \(\textrm{tr}[\phi (X)] > 0\). It’s trace preservation property is actually a trace fixing one, but these are physically equivalent when applied to normalized initial states. Kowalski and Rembieliński1, and also Rembieliński and Caban3, considered cases with linear \(\phi \) and \(\textrm{tr}[\phi (X)] \ne 1\), extending Gisin’s 1981 model12 to mixed states. We call these channels nonlinear in normalization only (NINO) to emphasize that the nonlinearity in this case serves only to conserve trace. We might think of NINO channels as being “mildly” nonlinear. In particular, they satisfy a convex quasilinearity property13, preventing superluminal signaling14,15,16,17,18. The main difference between linear completely positive trace-preserving (CPTP) and NINO channels are that the generators of linear CPTP evolution are negative definite, leading to strictly nonexpansive dynamics, whereas NINO channels support non-CP19,20,21,22 and entropy decreasing1 processes that amplify the Bloch vector1,6. Hence we can interpret the NINO master equation as extending the GKSL equation to non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Fernengel and Drossel2 studied cases where \(\phi \) is nonlinear and \(\textrm{tr}[\phi (X)]=1\), a family of state-dependent CPTP channels obtained by adding state-dependence to a Hamiltonian and set of Lindblad jump operators. This is a stronger form of nonlinearity, supporting rich dynamical phenomena such as such Hopf bifurcations and strange attractors usually associated with classical nonlinear systems2. State-dependent CPTP channels also support Bloch-ball torsion. Torsion can be created from the product of an SO(3) rotation generator \(J_\mu \) with the projection of the Bloch vector along the twist axis. Abrams and Lloyd23 and Childs and Young24 investigated state discrimination with z-axis torsion. Kłobus et al. 7 observed Feigenbaum’s universal period doubling in a mean field model simulating torsion. Torsion also arises in a qubit friendly extension25 of a rigorous duality between nonlinear mean field theory and the BBGKY hierarchy for n interacting bosons in the \(n \rightarrow \infty \) limit26,27,28,29,30. Many of these nonlinear models come from mean field theory.
Methods
In this paper we investigate qubit PTP channels with both nonlinear \(\phi \) and \(\textrm{tr}[\phi (X)] \ne 1\) that support generalized Lorenz attractors. The first version, which we call Lor63, implements Lorenz’s 1963 model31
where \(\textbf{r} = (x,y,z) = \textrm{tr}(X {\varvec{\sigma }})\) is the Bloch vector. However here we increase the nonlinearity by a factor of \(g \gg 1\) to shrink the attractor sufficiently as to contain it within the Bloch sphere. The master equation for the Lor63 qubit in the Pauli basis is
where \(a, b \in \{ 1,2,3 \}\) and
\(X \in {\mathbb C^{2 \times 2}}\) is a Hermitian positive-semidefinite matrix with unit trace. Model parameters \(\rho \), \(\sigma \), \(\beta \), g are given in Table 1. The nonlinear generator \(G^{ab}(\textbf{r})\) is a \(3 \times 3\) real matrix that depends on the Bloch vector \(\textbf{r}\). We decompose it into a linear (\(\textbf{r}\) independent) operator L plus x-axis torsion. The \(J\)'s are SO(3) generators: \( (J_a)_{bc} = - \varepsilon _{abc}\) with \(\varepsilon \) the Levi-Civita symbol. L is decomposed into symmetric and antisymmetric parts implementing a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian iL. \(\lambda _1\) is a Gell-Mann matrix. Note that \(\lambda _1\) has a positive eigenvalue corresponding to an amplifying and entropy decreasing non-CP process1. Techniques for constructing Gell-Mann matrices and other symmetric generators from jump operators are given in6.
Result and discussion
The Lor63 qubit is simulated in Fig. 1. The blue points indicate random initial conditions. Trajectories rapidly approach one of the two disc-shaped sets (pink or cyan) and bounce back and forth between them in an unpredictable manner, mirroring the aperiodic reversals of the Malkus waterwheel lying in its Fourier representation32.
Bloch ball dynamics of the Lor63 qubit. The faint yellow wireframe shows the Bloch sphere. Equator states \(\left| \pm \right\rangle = 2^{-1/2} (\left| 0 \right\rangle \pm \left| 1 \right\rangle )\) and \(\left| \pm i \right\rangle = 2^{-1/2} (\left| 0 \right\rangle \pm i \left| 1 \right\rangle )\) are also indicated with black dots and cyan lines. The model parameters used in the simulation are given in Table 1.
A Lorenz-like attractor can also be created from the z-axis torsion coming from the Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) equation24,33,34, leading to an aesthetic attracting set shown in Fig. 2. We call this channel the GP butterfly. The GP butterfly qubit has an especially simple master equation:
where \(m=10\), \(g=40\), and
is another Gell–Mann matrix. The symmetric generator \(\lambda _4\) can be implemented with Lindblad jump operators6.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have proposed nonlinear PTP channels for the generation of Lorenz-like attractors in the Bloch ball. Despite its early prominence the Lorenz system defied rigorous analysis until rather recently when, in 2002, Tucker35 established the existence of a strange attractor. Classical electrical circuits have been used to implement the Lorenz attractor and other chaotic and hyperchaotic attractors36,37,38,39, which might find cryptographic application40,41. It is tempting to speculate that chaotic attractors will find application in quantum technology as well. However it is important to recognize the very large nonlinear coupling strengths required, making experimental realization especially challenging.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Kowalski, K. & Rembieliński, J. Integrable nonlinear evolution of the qubit. Ann. Phys. 411, 167955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.167955 (2019).
Fernengel, B. & Drossel, B. Bifurcations and chaos in nonlinear Lindblad equations. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 385701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abaa85 (2020).
Rembieliński, J. & Caban, P. Nonlinear extension of the quantum dynamical semigroup. Quantum 5, 420 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-03-23-420
Kowalski, K. Linear and integrable nonlinear evolution of the qutrit. Quant. Inf. Proc. 19, 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-020-02640-6 (2020).
Buks, E. & Schwartz, D. Stability of the Grabert master equation. Phys. Rev. A 103, 052217. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.052217 (2021).
Geller, M.R. Fast quantum state discrimination with nonlinear PTP channels. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2200156 (2023). arXiv: 2111.05977. https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202200156.
Kłobus, W., Kurzyński, P., Kuś, M., Laskowski, W., Przybycień, R. & Życzkowski, K. Transition from order to chaos in reduced quantum dynamics. arXiv: 2111.13477.
Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A. & Sudarshan, E. C. G. Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems. J. Math. Phys. 17, 821. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.522979 (1976).
Lindblad, G. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
Sudarshan, E. C. G., Mathews, P. M. & Rau, J. Stochastic dynamics of quantum-mechanical systems. Phys. Rev. 121, 920. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.121.920 (1961).
Kraus, K. General state changes in quantum theory. Ann. Phys. 64, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(71)90108-4 (1971).
Gisin, N. A simple nonlinear dissipative quantum evolution equation. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 14, 2259 (1981).
Rembieliński, J. & Caban, P. Nonlinear evolution and signaling. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012027. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.012027 (2020).
Gisin, N. Weinberg’s nonlinear quantum mechanics and supraluminal communication. Phys. Lett. A 143, 1 (1990).
Polchinski, J. Weinberg’s nonlinear quantum mechanics and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 397. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.397 (1991).
Czachor, M. Mobility and non-separability. Found. Phys. Lett. 4, 351 (1991).
Gisin, N. & Rigo, M. Relevant and irrelevant nonlinear Schrodinger equations. J. Phys. A 28, 7375. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/28/24/030 (1995).
Kent, A. Nonlinearity without superluminality. Phys. Rev. A 72, 012108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012108 (2005).
Pechukas, P. Reduced dynamics need not be completely positive. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1060. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1060 (1994).
Shaji, A. & Sudarshan, E. C. G. Who’s afraid of not completely positive maps?. Phys. Lett. A 341, 48 (2005).
Carteret, H. A., Terno, D. R. & Życzkowski, K. Dynamics beyond completely positive maps: Some properties and applications. Phys. Rev. A 77, 042113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.042113 (2008).
Dominy, J. M., Shabani, A. & Lidar, D. A. A general framework for complete positivity. Quantum Inf. Process. 15, 465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-015-1148-0 (2016).
Abrams, D. S. & Lloyd, S. Nonlinear quantum mechanics implies polynomial-time solution for NP-complete and \(\#\)P problems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3992. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3992 (1998).
Childs, A. M. & Young, J. Optimal state discrimination and unstructured search in nonlinear quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 93, 022314. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.022314 (2016).
Geller, M.R. The Universe as a Nonlinear Quantum Simulation. arXiv: 2112.09005
Nachtergaele, B., Ogata, Y. & Sims, R. Propagation of correlations in quantum lattice systems. J. Stat. Phys. 124, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-006-9143-6 (2006).
Fröhlich, J., Graffi, S. & Schwarz, S. Mean-field and classical limit of many-body Schrödinger dynamics for bosons. Commun. Math. Phys. 271, 681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-007-0207-5 (2007).
Rodnianski, I. & Schlein, B. Quantum fluctuations and rate of convergence towards mean field dynamics. Commun. Math. Phys. 291, 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0867-4 (2009).
Erdős, L. & Schlein, B. Quantum dynamics with mean field interactions: A new approach. J. Stat. Phys. 134, 859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-008-9570-7 (2009).
Gokler, C. Mean Field Limit for Many-particle Interactions. arXiv: 2006.05486
Lorenz, E. N. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130 (1963).
Sparrow, C. The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors (Springer, 1982).
Meyer, D. A. & Wong, T. G. Nonlinear quantum search using the Gross–Pitaevskii equation. New J. Phys. 15, 063014 (2013).
Meyer, D. A. & Wong, T. G. Quantum search with general nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. A 89, 012312. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/6/063014 (2014).
Tucker, W. A rigorous ODE solver and Smale’s 14th problem. Found. Comput. Math. 2, 52 (2002).
Cuomo, K. M. & Oppenheim, A. V. Circuit implementation of synchronized chaos with applications to communications. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 65. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.65 (1993).
Qi, G., van Wyk, M. A., van Wyl, B. J. & Chen, G. A new hyperchaotic system and its circuit implementation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 40, 2544 (2009).
Liu, L., Du, C., Zhang, X., Li, J. & Shi, S. Dynamics and entropy analysis for a new 4-D hyperchaotic system with coexisting hidden attractors. Entropy 21, 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21030287 (2019).
Tian, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, P., Chen, M. & Wang, Y. Dynamic analysis and robust control of a chaotic system with hidden attractor. Complexity 2021, 8865522 (2021).
Al-Maadeed, T.A., Hussain, I., Anees, A. & Mustafa, M.T. An image encryption algorithm based on chaotic Lorenz system and novel primitive polynomial S-boxes. arXiv: 2006.11847.
Mafco, A.G., Martinez, A.S. & Bruno, O.M. Fast, parallel, and secure cryptography algorithm using Lorenz’s attractor. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 21, 365 (2010). arXiv:1201.3114. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183110015166.
Funding
This study was funded by National Science Foundation (No. DGE-2152159).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.G. conceived of the project and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Geller, M.R. Proposal for a Lorenz qubit. Sci Rep 13, 14106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40893-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40893-0




