Table 26 The comparison results of the tension/compression spring design problem.

From: Learning cooking algorithm for solving global optimization problems

Algorithms

Optimal values for variables

Optimum weight

\({\text {d}}\)

\({\text {D}}\)

\({\text {N}}\)

LCA

5.566E–02

4.591E–01

7.194E+00

1.250E–02

TSA

5.446E–02

4.256E–01

8.221E+00

1.290E–02

SSA

6.779E–02

1.039E+00

1.240E+00

3.231E+13

MVO

6.903E–02

9.348E–01

2.000E+00

1.782E–02

SCA

5.548E–02

4.536E–01

7.311E+00

1.300E–02

GWO

5.419E–02

4.197E–01

8.379E+00

1.279E–02

WOA

5.714E–02

5.025E–01

6.030E+00

1.317E–02

GJO

5.702E–02

4.984E–01

6.133E+00

1.318E–02

IGWO

5.118E–02

3.444E–01

1.206E+01

1.268E–02

MWOA

5.859E–02

5.467E–01

5.179E+00

1.347E–02

MTBO

5.327E–02

3.958E–01

9.328E+00

1.273E–02

BWO

5.000E–02

3.119E–01

1.500E+01

1.326E–02

HHO

6.223E–02

6.672E–01

3.624E+00

1.453E–02

MGO

5.000E–02

3.104E–01

1.500E+01

1.319E–02

SCSO

5.833E–02

5.385E–01

5.322E+00

1.342E–02