Table 4 Comparative evaluation of MIP and UiO catalysts in epoxide ring-opening reactions with various amine nucleophiles.
Entry | Catalyst | Epoxide | Amine | Major product | Time (h) | Conversion (%) | Selectivity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MIP |
|
|
| 1 | 95 | 93 |
2 | UiO |
|
|
| 2 | 97 | 93 |
3 | MIP |
|
|
| 2 | 93 | 82 |
4 | UiO |
|
|
| 2 | 98 | 82 |
5 | MIP |
|
|
| 2 | 94 | 80 |
6 | UiO |
|
|
| 2 | 98 | 80 |
7 | MIP |
|
|
| 2.5 | 93 | 90 |
8 | UiO |
|
|
| 2.5 | 98 | 90 |























