Table 5 Comparative performance analysis of various catalysts in the ring-opening reaction of styrene oxide.

From: Superior and efficient performance of cost-effective MIP-202 catalyst over UiO-66-(CO2H)2 in epoxide ring opening reactions

Catalyst

Nucleophile

Time (min)

Temperature (°C)

Yield (%)

TOF (h−1)a

References

MIL-pip-SO3H

Methanol

20 min

r.t

99.4

91.1

32

MIL-DABCO-SO3H

Methanol

30 min

r.t

98.3

89.4

32

MIL-101(HPW)

Methanol

20 min

40

99

98.5

43

Cu-MOF

Methanol

120 min

r.t

90

5.3

44

Fe-BTC

Methanol

60 min

40

83

10

45

HKUST-1

Methanol

150 min

40

94

5.6

46

PNVP/TiCl4

Methanol

15 min

r.t

98

80

47

MIL-101(Cr)-Pyz-RSO3H

Methanol

20 min

r.t

99

94

42

MIP

Methanol

25 min

r.t

99

707

This study

MIP-a

Methanol

25 min

r.t

70

499

This study

UiO-66(CO2H)2

Methanol

120 min

60

99

54

This study

Zr-BDC-MOF

Aniline

10 min

50

99.4

41

48

Zn-BTC-MOF

Aniline

10 min

50

98.3

21

48

Cu-BTC-MOF

Aniline

10 min

50

99

63

48

AlCl3

Aniline

120 min

60

98.7

49.6

28

Al(Otf)3

Aniline

120 min

60

82.5

43.65

28

Sn(OTf)2

Aniline

120 min

60

90.4

46.55

28

[tespmim][OTf]-Al(OTf)3

Aniline

120 min

60

99.9

49.95

28

CaO-SiO2-IL

Aniline

120 min

60

51.13

37

28

MIP

Aniline

60 min

r.t

99

107

This study

MIP-a

Aniline

60 min

r.t

62

67

This study

UiO-66-(CO2H)2

Aniline

120 min

60

99

55.5

This study

  1. a \({\text{TOF}}\left( {{\text{h}}^{ - 1} } \right) = { }\frac{{\text{mmol of converted styrene oxide}}}{{{\text{mmol of catalyst }} \times {\text{ Time of reaction }}\left( {\text{ hour}} \right)}}\).