Table 1 A comparison with state-of-the-art for several studies.

From: Greylag goose optimization and multilayer perceptron for enhancing lung cancer classification

Refs

Methodology

Findings

Nanglia et al.4

SVM with Feed-Forward Back Propagation Neural Network and GA optimization

Accuracy: 98.08%

Precision: 98.17%

Recall: 96.5%

F-Score: 97%

Mohamed et al.9

Hybrid CNN and Ebola Optimization Search Algorithm (EOSA)

Accuracy: 93.21%

Specificity:

- Normal: 79.41%

- Malignant: 93.28%

- Benign: 97.95%

Sensitivity:

- Normal: 90.38%

- Malignant: 90.71%

- Benign: 13.33%

Ren et al.10

Deep Convolutional GAN and VGG-DF model with regularization and transfer learning

Accuracy: 99.84% ± 0.156%

Precision: 99.84% ± 0.153%

Sensitivity: 99.84% ± 0.156%

F1-Score: 99.84% ± 0.156%

Bhattacharjee et al.11

Random Forest classifier with K-means visualization

10-Fold Cross-Validation Accuracy: 92.14%

Inertia Score: 16.21 (lowest)

Silhouette Score: 0.815 (highest)

Vijh et al.12

Whale Optimization Algorithm with SVM

Accuracy: 95%

Sensitivity: 100%

Specificity: 92%

Shakeel et al.13

Discrete AdaBoost optimized ensemble learning generalized neural network

Error Rate: 0.0212

Prediction Rate: 99.48%

Nancy et al.14

Particle Swarm Optimization with SVM

Accuracy: 97.6%

Specificity: 99%

Joshi et al.15

SMOCS (Cuckoo Search followed by Spider Monkey Optimization) and CSSMO (Spider Monkey Optimization followed by Cuckoo Search)

Accuracy: 100%

Saxena et al.16

A chaotic algorithm based on Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA) called Marine Predator Chaotic Algorithm (MPCA)

The proposed MPCA algorithm demonstrates the best graphical visualizations and statistical analysis

Yaqoob et al.17

Harris hawks optimization and cuckoo search algorithm (HHOCSA)

The proposed HHOCSA algorithm gives the best results when compared to another methods