Table 14 Comparative analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the hybrid deep learning algorithms.

From: Integrative hybrid deep learning for enhanced breast cancer diagnosis: leveraging the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database and the CBIS-DDSM dataset

Model

Accuracy (LB, UB)

Sensitivity (LB, UB)

Specificity (LB, UB)

Precision (LB, UB)

Recall (LB, UB)

AUC (LB, UB)

CNN

(82,87)

(79,86)

(80,85)

(81,87)

(82,86)

(0.82,0.87)

CNN-AlexNet

(84,89)

(81,85)

(84,86)

(83,88)

(82,89)

(0.84,0.89)

CNN-VGG

(83,90)

(80,91)

(81,89)

(80,91)

(82,92)

(0.83,0.90)

CNN-NiN

(85,91)

(82,90)

(83,90)

(83,91)

(84,90)

(0.85,0.91)

CNN-GoogleNet

(83,91)

(81,90)

(82,89)

(81,90)

(81,91)

(0.83,0.91)

CNN-ResNet

(84,93)

(82,90)

(80,92)

(81,92)

(83,93)

(0.84,0.93)

CNN-DenseNet

(82,92)

(85,93)

(84,90)

(86,90)

(83,91)

(0.82,0.92)

CNN-VGG + SGD

(88,96)

(86,95)

(85,96)

(86,95)

(88,96)

(0.88,0.96)

CNN-GoogleNet + SGD

(89,96)

(88,95)

(87,95)

(87,95)

(88,96)

(0.89,0.96)

CNN-DenseNet + SGD

(87,96)

(85,95)

(86,95)

(88,96)

(87,95)

(0.87,0.96)