Table 2 Studies from literature comparing the performance efficiency of QDSSC solar cells.
Sr. no. | Photoanode | QDs | Counter electrode | Jsc (mA/cm2) | Voc (V) | FF (%) | ɳ (%) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TiO2 | CdS | Cu2S | 0.82 | 0.40 | 36 | 0.8 | |
2 | TiO2 | CdS | Cu2S | 3.70 | 0.280 | 28 | 0.29 | |
3 | TiO2 | CdS | CuS | 1.01 | 0.46 | 34 | 1.05 | |
4 | TiO2 | CdS | CuS | 0.71 | 0.58 | 48 | 1.38 | |
6 | TiO2 | CdS | CuS | 0.70 | 0.36 | 41 | 0.70 | |
7 | ZnO | CdS | Pt | 0.52 | 3.16 | - | 0.68 | |
8 | ZnO | CdS | Carbon | 0.36 | 0.14 | 21 | 0.06 | |
9 | ZnO | CdS | Carbon | 1.51 | 0.48 | 23 | 0.25 | |
10 | ZnO | CdS | Cu2S | 4.40 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 0.85 | Present work |
