Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71775-8, published online 05 September2024


In the original version of this Article, Figures 5 and 8 contained editing marks that were not removed before publication. The original Figures 5 and 8 as well as their accompanying legends appear below.


Fig. 5
figure 5

Confusion matrix of different algorithms. SIR \(=-6\) dB. (a) CFAR, MFAP set to \({10}^{-6}\). (b) FCN. (c) LR-ASPP. (d) MobileNetV2. (e) ResNet-101. (f) Xception. (g) JSLCNN. (h) AC-UNet. (i) LDNet.


Fig. 8
figure 8

Results of RFI detection for out-of-dataset SIR. (a) Time–frequency spectrogram with SIR = 5 dB. (b) Detection results with SIR = 0 dB. (c) Detection results with SIR = 5 dB. (d) Detection results with SIR = 10 dB.


In addition, in Table 3, the “Comparison of MIoU (%)” for “LDNet” was incorrectly given as “–”. The incorrect and correct values appear below.


Incorrect:

Algorithm

MIoU

Comparison of MIoU (%)

FNR \(\times {10}^{-4}\)

FPR \(\times {10}^{-4}\)

LDNet

0.9722

1.61

0.33


Correct:

Algorithm

MIoU

Comparison of MIoU (%)

FNR \(\times {10}^{-4}\)

FPR \(\times {10}^{-4}\)

LDNet

0.9722

------

1.61

0.33


The original Article has been corrected.