Table 4 Comparison of intrathoracic deposition predicted by computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and rapid deposition analysis (RDA) for 20 studies on airway geometries of real patients. API: active pharmaceutical ingredients, % DD: percentage of delivered dose, accuracy is calculated as the absolute difference between RDA and CFD predicted values divided by the CFD values and multiplied by 100 then subtract the results by 100.

From: Rapid deposition analysis of inhaled aerosols in human airways

Device/API

CFD Deposition [% DD]

RDA Deposition [% DD]

Accuracy of RDA compared to CFD

Nexthaler_ICS

24.64 ± 5.05

27.01 ± 2.30

97.0%

Nexthaler_LABA

26.24 ± 5.39

28.81 ± 2.45

95.5%

Ellipta_ICS

14.91 ± 5.23

14.69 ± 1.04

90.7%

Ellipta_LABA

26.34 ± 6.58

27.61 ± 1.94

88.2%

Turbohaler_ICS

41.36 ± 7.59

35.55 ± 2.49

94.2%

Turbohaler_LABA

42.03 ± 7.82

36.02 ± 2.52

93.5%

Inhub_ICS

17.40 ± 3.42

14.66 ± 1.22

96.8%

Inhub_LABA

20.16 ± 3.80

17.26 ± 1.43

94.1%

SPECT

65.33 ± 3.91

65.43 ± 4.99

99.8%

eFlow_FormulA

51.60 ± 1.57

61.19 ± 3.57

85.2%

eFlow_FormulC

52.14 ± 1.39

62.53 ± 3.36

84.0%

Zirela

40.01 ± 12.69

42.61 ± 4.76

96.8%

Symbicort_slow

68.94 ± 5.23

61.09 ± 2.75

88.8%

Symbicort_fast

61.97 ± 7.23

52.14 ± 2.35

89.1%

Fostair_ICS

40.81 ± 1.27

37.34 ± 1.35

89.0%

Fostair_LABA

39.66 ± 1.16

35.69 ± 1.29

88.4%

Test_MDI

49.44 ± 3.38

48.63 ± 2.19

90.4%

Trimbow_ICS

34.03 ± 5.35

36.57 ± 1.39

96.5%

Trimbow_LABA

34.82 ± 5.48

37.53 ± 1.42

96.1%

Trimbow_LAMA

33.24 ± 5.23

35.61 ± 1.35

96.8%