Table 4 Comparison of indirect effects of relative deprivation on psychological well-being parallel mediated by self-efficacy and self-control (n = 426).

From: Roles of self-efficacy and self-control in the association between relative deprivation and psychological well-being among undergraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic

 

Coeffect

Boot SE

95% Boot CI

Effect-total effect ratio

Effect

Total indirect effect of X on Y

0.082

0.015

[0.054, 0.113]

 

 Indirect effect 1: X \(\to\) M1 \(\to\) Y

0.069

0.014

[0.043, 0.097]

84.15%

 Indirect effect 2: X \(\to\) M2 \(\to\) Y

0.013

0.006

[0.003, 0.027]

15.85%

Indirect effect contrast

 Indirect effect 1 minus indirect effect 2

0.056

0.015

[0.028, 0.086]

 
  1. Notes: X = relative deprivation, Y = psychological well-being, M1 = self-efficacy, M2 = self-control; Boot SE = Boot standard error, Boot CI = Boot confidence intervals.
Back to article page