Table 1 Study characteristics.

From: Efficacy of stellate ganglion block in treatment of electrical storm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Year

Sample Size (n)

Female, no. (%)

Ischemic heart disease, no. (%)

Previous catheter ablation, no. (%)

Mean Age (years)

Mean LVEF (%)

Timing of SGB and inclusion criteria

Batnyam et al.35

2024

15

2 (13.3)

8 (53.3)

10 (66.7)

62.8

31.8

Refractory to medical therapies

Cardona et al.33

2024

15

10 (66.7)

1 (6.7)

NA

67.8

NA

Refractory – Failure of at least one IV AAD

Chouairi et al.32

2024

117

7

61 (52.1)

66 (56.4)

63.5

26.7

Refractory to conventional therapies

Dhanse et al.21

2022

11

7 (63.6)

9 (81.8)

NA

62.7

33.9

Refractory – Failure of IV amiodarone, lidocaine and Mg

Halawa et al.22

2021

19

2 (10.5)

10 (52.6)

9 (47.3)

66.5

28

NA

Kotti et al.23

2019

11

NA

11 (100)

NA

57

35

Refractory – Failure of at least one oral and one IV AAD

Lador et al.24

2023

25

6 (24)

14 (56)

12 (48.0)

59.2

20

Refractory – Not controlled by AADs

Markman et al.25

2023

11

2 (18.2)

6 (54.5)

6 (54.5)

59

15

Refractory – NA

Otakar et al.26

2023

59

3 (5.1)

42 (71.2)

NA

67.7

30

Refractory – failure of immediate therapy, including sedation and AADs

Pasula et al.27

2023

56

16 (28.6)

43 (76.8)

NA

60

NA

Refractory – Failure of two AADs

Patel et al.28

2023

11

1 (9.1)

10 (90.9)

NA

62.1

NA

NA

Reinertsen et al. 29

2021

13

3 (23.1)

6 (46.2)

NA

64

23

Refractory – Drug refractory

Sanghai et al.30

2021

18

2 (11.1)

7 (38.9)

NA

61.1

30.9

Refractory – Failure of at least one AAD

Savastano et al.34

2024

131

22 (16.8)

37 (28.2)

NA

68

25

Refractory – Failure of at least one IV AAD

Tian et al.31

2019

30

8 (26.7)

17 (56.7)

14 (46.7)

58

34

NA

  1. Abbreviations: AAD – anti-arrhythmic drug, IV – intravenous, Mg – magnesium, NA – not available, SGB – stellate ganglion block.