Introduction

When machining deep small holes with electric discharge, it is easy to generate phenomena such as arc pulling or short circuit, which accelerates electrode wear. As the processing depth increases, this disadvantage becomes particularly prominent1. Ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining can greatly reduce the occurrence of such phenomena. In recent years, with the development of microfabrication technology, research on ultrasonic assisted machining has been increasingly valued.

Ultrasonic machining originated in the early 20th century, and since then, various countries have conducted research and experiments on ultrasonic machining technology. In the late 1920s, American scholars Wood and Lumis conducted ultrasonic drilling experiments using glass as the workpiece for processing. In the early 1940s, ultrasonic machining technology first appeared in relevant literature2. In the mid-20th century, researchers began to apply ultrasonic vibration to electrical discharge machining processes. In 1986, Indian scholar V S. R. MURTI et al.3 studied the effect of ultrasonic radiation in machining gaps on debris in electrical discharge machining. Through scanning electron microscopy, it was found that most of the processed debris is spherical with small ellipticity. Except for some isolated hollow particles, everything else is solid. The experimental results also found that ultrasonic vibration can affect the sphericity, size, and collision rate of eroded particles. In 2015, Iranian scholars Shabgard, M. R. et al.4 used scanning electron microscopy and X-ray to detect the surface integrity of workpieces. The results indicate that ultrasonic vibration of cutting tools can increase normal discharge, reduce arc discharge and open circuit pulse, and thereby improve the machining quality of workpieces. In 2016, Viorel Mihai N et al.5 discovered that the introduction of ultrasonic vibration can improve the erosion ability of electric discharge wire cutting machining. Through a large number of experiments, the influence of different process parameters and materials on their erosion ability was obtained.

In China, ultrasonic composite processing began in the 1950s. In the late 1960s, Harbin Institute of Technology combined ultrasonic vibration with cutting to produce aluminum slender shafts with excellent cutting effects6.

In the early 21st century, scholar of Harbin Institute of Technology successfully developed a rotating ultrasonic processing equipment suitable for carbon fiber materials. At the same time, the Special Processing Research Institute of the school also successfully completed the development of a four axis linkage precision micro electric discharge machining machine, which can machine micro holes with diameters ranging from 8 μm to 40 μm7.

Scholars Hu Jianhua et al. from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics8 analyzed the influence of various parameters of ultrasonic excitation voltage on the effect of micro hole machining, and obtained a relationship diagram between duty cycle and machining time. Xiaopeng Yang et al. from Taiyuan University of Technology9 designed and analyzed the ultrasonic electric discharge machining spindle system in modules according to the different functions implemented. They designed a high-precision rotating spindle that can process ceramic coatings and efficiently and precisely process metal substrates. Through experiments, they verified the machining ability of the ultrasonic electric discharge machining process for small holes in metal based ceramic coating materials for aircraft engine turbine blades.

Tianjin University scholars Ni Hao et al.10 established a mechanical model of the ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining system based on the vertical vibration of electrodes, and analyzed the influence of electrode length on the resonance frequency of the system. The study showed that when using slender electrodes, the vibration system not only has the local resonance frequency of the electrodes, but also the local resonance frequency of the driving system. When the resonance frequency of the electrodes approaches and exceeds the resonance frequency of the driving system, the deviation between the resonance frequency of the system and the resonance frequency of the electrodes increases.

The paper summarizes the current research status, and attaches a ultrasonic vibration system to the workpiece. Based on the characteristics of horizontal vibration, a new type of amplitude converter is designed to meet the needs of horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrospark machining, which has certain theoretical significance and engineering value. It can be applied to the machining of various parts with deep small hole geometries.

Horizontal ultrasonic vibration and machining clearance

At present, vertical vibration is mainly applied to the machining electrode. This auxiliary machining method drives the discharge of debris inside the hole through the up and down vibration of the electrode and the cavitation effect it generates, thereby improving machining efficiency11. The horizontal ultrasonic assisted machining studied in this article optimized the discharge gap of electric discharge and improved the workpiece erosion rate per discharge. Meanwhile, the cavitation effect generated by ultrasonic vibration also contributes to the removal of materials and debris, making it more practical.

Due to the fact that the surface of the workpiece is not absolutely smooth, the discharge point is always at the point with a relatively small discharge gap. When horizontal ultrasonic vibration is introduced into the workpiece, the workpiece will move back and forth under the excitation of the amplitude lever, which greatly increases the probability of spark discharge between various points on the workpiece surface and the electrode, thereby indirectly improving the discharge efficiency. The schematic diagram of horizontal ultrasonic vibration machining is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of horizontal vibration machining of workpieces.

Assuming that the state of the electrode and the workpiece before discharge is shown in Figure (a). At this point, the breakdown gap of the electric spark is h0, and in Figure (a), there is only one point that meets the requirements for electric spark breakdown. When the workpiece undergoes horizontal ultrasonic vibration, the protrusion of the electrode is misaligned with the protrusion of the workpiece. At this time, there is no point that meets the breakdown requirements, and a discharge gap cannot be formed, as shown in (b). When the machining electrode is moves downwards, the machining gap of the electric discharge decreases, and at this time, the area of the discharge channel area greatly increases, as shown in Figure (c). Therefore, horizontal ultrasonic vibration of the workpiece can improve the machining gap of electric discharge, increase the workpiece erosion rate of each discharge, and thus improve the machining efficiency of electric discharge machining.

Due to the workpiece vibration frequency is very fast, the discharge point will not stay the same area, which can greatly reduce the electrode loss. At the same time, the instability of the discharge point can also reduce the possibility of arc and short circuit.

Ultrasonic vibration system

The ultrasonic vibration system consists of three parts12: an ultrasonic power supply (ultrasonic generator), a transducer, and an ultrasonic amplitude converter. This paper introduces ultrasonic vibration at the processing of workpieces, and the machining schematic diagram is shown in Fig. 2:

Fig. 2
figure 2

Ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining system.

Ultrasonic transducer

The ultrasonic vibration system designed in this paper uses a giant magnetostrictive transducer as the driving element of the amplitude converter, consisting of a shell, output shaft, GMM (Giant Magnetostrictive Material) rod, permanent magnet, and excitation coil13. Its basic structure is shown in Fig. 3:

Fig. 3
figure 3

Structural diagram of giant magnetostrictive transducer.

The transducer uses GMM rods as the driving element, which is made of Terfenol-D (Terbium Dysprosium Iron Rare Earth Giant Magnetostrictive Alloy). The entire driving element consists of three equally long GMM rods, with permanent magnets bonded at both ends of the rods. The outer side of the driving element is the excitation coil, with a coil diameter of 0.1 mm. At the same time, apply a certain amount of prestress on the upper side of the GMM rod.

When a certain amount of current is applied to the coil, the excitation coil generates a magnetic field under the effect of the current magnetic effect. Under the action of this magnetic field, the magnetization characteristics inside Terfenol-D will change, leading to deformation. The deformation is transmitted to the amplitude lever through the output shaft, and then to the processed workpiece.

Amplitude lever

The structure of the amplitude lever is shown in Fig. 4, which is a stepped two-stage amplitude converter with a conical transition section. Among them, the cross-sectional area of the input end is S1, the cross-sectional area of the output end is S3, the cross-sectional area of the large end at the section transition is, and the cross-sectional area of the small end is S2. Take the section jump of the amplitude lever as the coordinate origin.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Amplitude lever.

Divide the amplitude lever into sections and calculate the performance parameters of the cylindrical and conical sections in sequence. According to the solution approach of the stepped deformation amplitude pole, when x = 0, due to the sudden change in cross-section and the complexity of the situation, the force at the sudden change can be considered continuous. Assuming that the two ends of the amplitude pole are free and the amplitude at the input end is 1, the boundary conditions are:

When x=-a,

$$\:{\left.{\xi\:}_{a}\right|}_{x=-a}=1,{\left.\frac{\partial\:{\xi\:}_{a}}{\partial\:x}\right|}_{x=-a}=0$$
(1)

Furthermore, the displacement equation of the cylindrical segment can be obtained14:

$$\:{\xi\:}_{a}=\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left[k(a+x)\right]\begin{array}{cc}&\:(-a<x<0)\end{array}$$
(2)

At this point, the vibration displacement at the sudden change in cross-section:

$$\:{\xi\:}_{2}=\xi\:{{\prime\:}}_{2}=\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right),\:{\left.{S}_{1}E\frac{\partial\:{\xi\:}_{a}}{\partial\:x}\right|}_{x=0}={S}_{2}E{\left.\frac{\partial\:{\xi\:}_{b}}{\partial\:x}\right|}_{x=0}$$
(3)

When x = 0, \(\:{\xi\:}_{b}={\xi\:}_{a}\).

When x = b, \(\:{\left.{\xi\:}_{b}\right|}_{x=-b}=-{\xi\:}_{3}\).

When 0 < x < b, the displacement equation of the conical section variable amplitude rod is15:

$$\:{\xi\:}_{b}=\frac{\alpha\:}{\alpha\:x-1}\left[A\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\right(kx)+B\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}(kx\left)\right]$$
(4)

The expression for strain distribution is:

$$\:\frac{\partial\:{\xi\:}_{b}}{\partial\:x}=\frac{\alpha\:}{\alpha\:x-1}[-A\cdot\:k\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}(kx)+B\cdot\:k\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}(kx\left)\right]-\frac{{\alpha\:}^{2}}{{(\alpha\:x-1)}^{2}}\left[A\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\right(kx)+B\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}(kx\left)\right]$$
(5)

At this point, the constant can be determined, \(\:A=-\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{\alpha\:},B=\frac{\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\left(ka\right)\cdot\:{S}_{1}}{\alpha\:\cdot\:{S}_{2}}+\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{k}\) ,

The expression for particle displacement taken into Eq. (5) is16:

$$\:{\xi\:}_{b}=\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{1-\alpha\:x}\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(kx\right)-[\frac{{S}_{1}\cdot\:\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\left(ka\right)}{{S}_{2}\cdot\:(\alpha\:x-1)}+\frac{\alpha\:}{\alpha\:x-1}\cdot\:\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{k}]\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\left(kx\right)$$
(6)

In summary, the particle displacement equation of the amplitude lever is:

$$\:\left\{\begin{array}{c}{\xi\:}_{a}=cos\left[{k}_{1}(a+x)\right]\begin{array}{cc}&\:(-a<x<0)\end{array}\\\:{\xi\:}_{b}=\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{1-\alpha\:x}cos\left(kx\right)-[\frac{{S}_{1}\cdot\:\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\left(ka\right)}{{S}_{2}\cdot\:(\alpha\:x-1)}+\frac{\alpha\:}{\alpha\:x-1}\cdot\:\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{k}]sin\left(kx\right)\begin{array}{cc}&\:(0<x<b)\end{array}\end{array}\right.$$
(7)

In the above equation, \(\:\alpha\:=\frac{{R}_{1}-{R}_{2}}{{R}_{1}{L}_{2}}=\frac{{N}_{2}-1}{{N}_{2}{L}_{2}}\begin{array}{cc}&\:({N}_{2}=\frac{{R}_{3}}{{R}_{2}})\end{array}\), \(\:k=\frac{2\pi\:f}{c}\)

  1. (1)

    Resonance length

If both the cylindrical and conical sections are designed according to a 1/4 amplitude converter, the resonant length of the composite amplitude converter is:

$$\:{L}_{P}={L}_{{P}_{1}}+{L}_{{P}_{2}}=\frac{\lambda\:}{4}+\frac{\lambda\:}{4}\frac{k{L}_{2}}{\pi\:}$$
(8)
  1. (2)

    Displacement node x0

Combined with the structure of the amplitude lever, it can be approximated that the displacement node is located at the center position, i.e. x = 0.

  1. (3)

    Amplification factor

    when \(\:\:{\left.{\xi\:}_{a}\right|}_{x=-a}=1,\:{\left.{\xi\:}_{b}\right|}_{x=b}=\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{1-\alpha\:b}\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(kb\right)-[\frac{{S}_{1}\cdot\:\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\left(ka\right)}{{S}_{2}\cdot\:(\alpha\:b-1)}+\frac{\alpha\:}{\alpha\:b-1}\cdot\:\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{k}]\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\left(kb\right)\) ,

so the amplification factor is:

$$\:{M}_{P}=\left|\frac{{\left.{\xi\:}_{b}\right|}_{x=b}}{{\left.{\xi\:}_{a}\right|}_{x=-a}}\right|=\left|{\left.{\xi\:}_{b}\right|}_{x=b}=\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{1-\alpha\:b}\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(kb\right)-[\frac{{S}_{1}\cdot\:\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\left(ka\right)}{{S}_{2}\cdot\:(\alpha\:b-1)}+\frac{\alpha\:}{\alpha\:b-1}\cdot\:\frac{\text{c}\text{o}\text{s}\left(ka\right)}{k}]\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}\left(kb\right)\right|$$
(9)
  1. (4)

    Calculation

    The resonant frequency of the amplitude lever is known to be 12 kHz, made of 6061 aluminum alloy. The longitudinal wave velocity c in the amplitude converter is 6.1 × 106 mm/s, and the diameters of the input end (D1), section (D2), and output end (D3) are 54 mm, 36 mm, and 16 mm, respectively. Therefore, the area coefficient.

    $$\:{N}_{2}=\frac{{D}_{2}}{{D}_{3}}=2.25.$$

When N2 = 2.25, it can be programmatically calculated that kL2 = 3.3351.

Therefore, it can be determined that the resonant length LP of the new amplitude converter is 260 mm, with a cylindrical section length of 128 mm. Meanwhile, the amplification factor MP of the amplitude lever is 6.9 mm, and the displacement node of the amplitude converter is located at the section mutation. In summary, the various parameters of the composite deformation amplitude pole are shown in Table 1:

Table 1 Variable amplitude Pole parameters.

In the experiment, the workbench length L1 of the electric discharge small hole machining machine was 60 mm, and the resonance length LP of the new amplitude lever was much smaller than half of the workbench length L1. Therefore, the performance parameters of the amplitude lever meet the experimental design conditions.

Amplitude verification experiment

In order to reduce the influence of external environment on experimental data and reduce experimental errors, the ultrasonic vibration system is fixed on the isolation platform and its output curve is measured using a laser signal sensor. The experimental equipment mainly includes: ultrasonic vibration system, laser signal sensor, laser vibrometer, and oscilloscope.

The measurement platform of this experiment is shown in Fig. 5, where the new amplitude converter is bonded to the end of the transducer through epoxy resin. Align one fiber optic probe of the OFV-552 fiber optic sensor with the output end of the target and the other with the connection base of the target to remove base vibration interference and obtain the relative vibration signal of the amplitude converter. In the experiment, the fiber optic probe is fixed with a magnetic gauge holder.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Measurement platform for vibration characteristics of variable amplitude rod.

Results

By experiments, the displacement and velocity curves of the transducer, as well as the displacement and velocity curves of the transducer connected to the amplitude converter, can be obtained. As shown in Fig. 6:

Fig. 6
figure 6

Output characteristic curve of transducer and amplitude lever.

Select a part of the curves and organize the experimental data as shown in Table 2:

Table 2 The experimental data of vibration.

In the experiment, the displacement curve measurement range of the transducer is 200 nm/V. The displacement curve measurement range of the amplitude lever is 1 μm/V. So, the output displacement of transducer is 0.28 μm, and the output displacement of Variable amplitude pole is 2 μm. Therefore the amplification factor M1 of the amplitude lever is 7.14, which is consistent with the theoretical value (6.9).

Horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining

This experiment was conducted on a high-speed small hole machining machine tool using electric discharge technology. The main equipment used during the experiment included a horizontal ultrasonic vibration system, an electric discharge small hole machining machine tool, and workpieces made of different materials. The electric discharge small hole machining machine tool consists of six parts: spindle, rotating head, coordinate worktable, machine electrical, control box, and working fluid system. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 7:

Fig. 7
figure 7

Horizontal ultrasonic-assisted electric discharge machining experimental device.

When the electric spark small hole processing machine tool starts working, the transducer is controlled to work, and the transducer transmits the displacement signal to the horn, which is amplified by the horn, so that the workpiece vibrates horizontally with the horn.

Processing speed

The experimental materials are stainless steel 304 and pig iron Z30, and their properties are shown in Table 3:

The processing depth of the hole is 16mm, and the processing diameter is 2mm.The thickness of the workpiece is 16mm. Start timing when the electrode discharges, stop timing when the workpiece is perforated. The number of experimental samples is 20. After removing abnormal data caused by external environment, 16 samples are selected as experimental data for analysis, as shown in Fig. 8:

Fig. 8
figure 8

Changes in efficiency of electric discharge machining with horizontal ultrasonic assistance.

Table 3 The properties of the workpiece materials.

The specific values are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 The experimental data of processing speed.

By calculation, it can be determined that the average speeds for conventional electrical discharge machining of stainless steel and pig iron are 0.152 mm/s and 0.139 mm/s, respectively, while the average speeds for horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining of stainless steel and pig iron are 0.202 mm/s and 0.205 mm/s, respectively. By comparison, it is found that under the action of horizontal ultrasonic vibration, the processing efficiency of stainless steel and pig iron has increased by 33% and 42%.

Electrode wear

When the machining depth of the electrode is 16 mm, the wire is changed and the electrode wear data is saved. According to the above method, collect the electrode wear of horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining and conventional electrical discharge machining, and analyze the results. The experimental data is shown in Table 5:

Table 5 Electrode wear under two Processing methods.

As shown in the table above, when the machining depth is constant (16 mm), the average electrode wear of conventional electrical discharge machining is 5.6 mm, while the average electrode wear of horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining is 3.6 mm. Therefore, horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining can reduce electrode loss.

Take the machining electrodes of horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining and conventional electrical discharge machining, and observe them under a digital microscope, as shown in Fig. 9:

Fig. 9
figure 9

Electrode wear of two processing methods.

In Fig. 9, 1 shows the electrode wear of horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining, and 2 shows the electrode wear of conventional electrical discharge machining. The scale in the figure is 5000 μm.

From the picture, it can be seen that there is a serious phenomenon of secondary machining in the process of electric discharge machining. Not only will the bottom of the electrode erode the workpiece, but the side of the electrode will also react with the eroded debris, leading to severe electrode wear. Horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining can greatly reduce the occurrence of this phenomenon.

When the working level vibrates, the workpiece drives the horizontal reciprocating vibration of the working fluid in the small hole, causing debris in the working fluid to accumulate towards the side wall of the small hole and be discharged with the machining fluid, thereby alleviating the wear of the electrode to a certain extent. Therefore, the electrode wear depth of conventional electrical discharge machining is higher than that of horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining.

Microscopic morphology analysis

Cut the parts and select a sample that is easy to observe, clean the sample, and observe it under a digital microscope. The microstructure is shown in Fig. 10:

Fig. 10
figure 10

Microscopic morphology of workpieces under two different processing methods.

In Fig. 10a and b, it can be seen that in ordinary electrical discharge machining, there will be collapse phenomenon in the small holes of stainless steel, that is, the inner surface will fluctuate. It is because in the process of electric discharge machining, as the depth increases, debris deposits at the bottom and cannot be completely discharged, which affects the uniformity of discharge, leading to local overheating or burns, resulting in some large pits on the inner wall of the hole. Ultrasonic assisted machining improves the machining gap and promotes the discharge of debris due to the horizontal vibration of the workpiece. Therefore, the inner wall condition is better than that of electrical discharge machining.

Under the action of horizontal ultrasonic vibration, the roughness inside the hole of stainless steel (about 2 μm) is significantly higher than that of ordinary electric discharge machining (about 4 μm), and the hole is smoother, with smaller surface on the hole wall compared to ordinary electric discharge machining. Although pig iron materials also have similar phenomena, they are not obvious.

In Fig. 10c and d, the biggest difference between ordinary electric discharge machining and horizontal ultrasonic assisted electric discharge machining is the bottom of the small hole -- the surface roughness of the bottom of the small hole in ordinary electric discharge machining is lower (about 4 μm) and there is internal collapse phenomenon, but the bottom of the small hole in horizontal ultrasonic assisted electric discharge machining is relatively smooth(about 1.5 μm), and the surface inside the hole are basically melted into one piece. In summary, horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining can improve the internal surface roughness of small holes and avoid collapse inside the holes.

Conclusions

The paper analyzed the promoting effect of horizontal vibration of workpieces on the machining effect of electric discharge machining based on the machining mechanism of electric discharge machining. At the same time, a complete horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining system was established and applied in experiments, achieving the following results:

  1. (1)

    Through vibration characteristic measurement experiments, it was found that the measured value (7.1) of the amplification factor of the vibration system is close to the theoretical value (6.9).

  2. (2)

    Conducted horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining experiments. The experimental results indicate that horizontal ultrasonic vibration of the workpiece can improve the efficiency of electrical discharge machining. By comparison, under the action of horizontal ultrasonic vibration, the processing efficiency of stainless steel and pig iron increased by 33% and 42%, respectively. Moreover, the effect of ultrasonic vibration varies for different metal materials. For example, when processing pig iron, the processing speed of ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining is higher than that of stainless steel.

  3. (3)

    By comparing the degree of electrode wear and the microstructure inside the hole, it was found that under the same processing depth and material conditions, the degree of electrode wear in conventional electrical discharge machining is higher than that in horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining, and its degree of oxidation corrosion is deeper. By comparing the imaging images of digital stereomicroscopes with different processing materials and methods, it can be seen that the surface roughness of small holes in horizontal ultrasonic assisted electrical discharge machining is higher than that in ordinary electrical discharge machining, and there is no local collapse phenomenon inside the hole.