Introduction

The wastes from industrial and agricultural wastewater are very hazardous to human beings and can seriously damage different ecosystems1,2,3. To solve this problem, photocatalysts could provide a promising approach to degrade organic pollutants due to their low cost, biostability, nontoxic, and harmless properties4,5. Photocatalysis can be defined as the chemical reaction process involving light and a catalyst6,7,8. Over the last few years, significant progress has been made in the advancement of heterojunction photocatalysts aimed at enhancing their catalytic effectiveness. This has been achieved by generating intermediate states between the valence and conduction bands using external impurities9. Creating a heterojunction structure between two semiconductors, like ZnS and TiO2, can enhance the separation and movement of electron-hole pairs generated by light10,11. In this regard, various UV-responsive TiO2-based catalysts such as ZnO/TiO212, CdS/TiO213, WO3/TiO214, and ZnS/TiO215,16 have been fabricated and used as photocatalysts. The ZnS/TiO2photocatalyst demonstrates improved photostability and enhanced performance compared to its individual components17,18,19. However, TiO2-based composites suffer from relatively wide bandgap energy and low adsorption capacity which limits their photocatalytic applications20,21,22,23. Numerous researchers have endeavored to improve the performance of these nanocomposites by reducing the bandgap, increasing charge separation, and refining adsorption capacity through various strategies23,24,25.

Plasma catalysis is a growing field of engineering plasma that involves the usage of non-thermal plasma in combination with a catalyst to enhance the processing of input gas streams on catalytic surfaces26,27,28. Non-thermal plasma contains various chemical reactive species, including •OH, O2, H2O2, and O3, which are highly efficient in oxidizing organic compounds29,30. These species can interact with the catalyst surface31,32. Moreover, plasma can generate beneficial physical phenomena like UV-light emission and strong electric fields, which can aid in the breakdown and elimination of contaminants33,34,35,36. Due to the significant impact of plasma on the surface condition of the catalyst, it is evident that the catalyst function will be modified37. Because of large fluxes of plasma species, employing plasma on the surface of the catalyst is able to give rise to important alterations in its structure and morphology leading to catalyst dispersion38. In this regard, the integration of nitrogen and/or fluorine-based plasma with catalysts is one of the effective methods for enhancing photocatalytic performance. This process can be implemented by plasma nitriding and/or surface fluorination using nitrogen and/or fluorine-based plasma via a dielectric-barrier discharge (DBD) plasma reactor39,40,41,42,43. The N- and/or F-doping species lead to a narrower bandgap and more noticeable light-absorbing ability40,41,42,43,44,45,46. Among the fluorocarbon plasmas, tetrafluoromethane (CF4) is chosen as a non-toxic source of reactive F-species. The key effects of N2 and CF4plasma on the catalyst surface are to alter the catalyst properties, including morphology and pore volume, and boost the activity of the catalyst47,48.

This research assessed the photocatalytic effectiveness of plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites by examining their ability to degrade Acid Blue 113 (AB113) under UV light exposure. Surface modification of the nanocomposites was performed by a low-pressure DBD plasma reactor under N2 and CF4 gases. To our knowledge, no report about the plasma surface modification of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite has been presented in the literature yet. This study served to highlight the potential of plasma-treated photocatalysts for applications related to the restoration of environment.

Experimental section

Chemicals and catalyst preparation

In this work, the pure zinc sulfide (ZnS) and ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite were synthesized by the hydrothermal method as described below. We used the thioacetamide (C2H5NS), ethylenediamine, zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O), carbon disulfide (CS2), ethanol, acetone, and TiO2 as precursors. Nano-sized anatase TiO2 powder, with a diameter of less than 25 nm and a purity of over 99%, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Synthesis of ZnS photocatalyst

Pure ZnS nanoparticles were synthesized using thioacetamide (C2H5NS) and zinc nitrate as precursors. 0.38 g of thioacetamide was mixed with a solution containing 1.5 g of zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn (NO3)2·6H2O) in 37.5 mL of ethanol and then the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. After this step, the solution was shifted to a 100 mL autoclave. The autoclave was heated in the oven at 120C for 5 h and subsequently allowed to attain room temperature. The prepared sample was retrieved through centrifugation and then rinsed thrice with distilled water and ethanol. The resultant product was placed in the oven for a final drying process at 60 °C for 10 h.

ZnS/TiO2 photocatalyst synthesis

The synthesis of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite involved the combination of zinc diethyldithiocarbamate and the addition of ZnCl2·4H2O (6.5 mmol, 1.36 g) in 50 mL water, followed with stirring the reaction mixture at room temperature. Then, ethylenediamine (20 mmol, 1.33 mL) and CS2 (13.5 mmol, 0.8 mL) were added to the suspension of ZnCl2·4H2O in water. After mixing the mixture for 2 h, a quantity of 2.5 mL of ethylenediamine was incrementally introduced into a solution of acetone (47.5 mL) containing zinc dithiocarbamate complex and 0.125 g of TiO2nanoparticles49. After refluxing for 4 h, the solid was separated from the liquid phase through centrifugation, followed by washing with acetone and drying at ambient temperature for 24 h.

Plasma surface modification

In this work, a homemade DBD reactor has been used, and a detailed description of that is given in Refs39,50,51. The DBD plasma chamber is made of stainless steel, and the chamber volume is about 6200 cm3. The two electrodes in the DBD are made of stainless-steel plate with a diameter of 8 cm and thickness 2 cm. Both electrodes are covered by quartz dielectrics with thicknesses of 10 mm. The gap between the two dielectrics was regulated to 8 mm. The upper electrode is connected to a high-voltage power supply (14 kV peak-to-peak), while the lower electrode is grounded. The nano-powders were placed inside a thin plastic petri dish (with a diameter of 6 cm and no cap) on the lower electrode (lower dielectric). The nano-powders spread uniformly on the petri dish so that most of that were exposed to plasma radiation. Before each plasma deposition, the chamber is pumped down by a two-stage rotary vacuum pump to a pressure of 10–4 mbar, and then it is filled by the N2 and/or CF4 gas to 0.15 bar pressure to ensure high gas purity for the glow discharge. After filling the chamber with the gas, the gas flow was switched off and then the plasma ignited for the treatment process. To generate a uniform N2 (or CF4) plasma, voltage and frequency have been adjusted to 14 kV and 22 kHz. Here, the discharge power was 150 W. The plasma treatment duration was adjusted to 20 min.

Degradation of acid blue 113 (AB113) dye

The effectiveness of ZnS/TiO2 and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites in catalyzing the degradation of AB113 dye under UV irradiation was examined. AB113 dye (C32H21N5Na2O6S2, weight: 681.65 g/mol, λmax: 566 nm) is an acid dye containing a diazo group and is commonly utilized by textile manufacturers. This water-soluble azo dye produces a blue colloidal solution. The degradation of AB113 in the ZnS/TiO2 and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 composites was investigated under different conditions, such as different pH levels (3.0–8.0) obtained, through the addition of HCl or NaOH and reaction time intervals (5–25 min). A 200 mL of dye solution was put into a flask, followed by the addition of 40 mg of the catalyst (this optimum amount was obtained based on the preliminary studies). After being exposed to irradiation for a specific duration, the photocatalyst particles were separated through centrifugation. The elimination of dye was assessed by means of a spectrophotometer at the wavelength of maximum absorbance, which was 566 nm. The catalytic efficiency in the decomposition of AB113 was determined through Eqs. (1),

$$\:Degradation\:Efficiency\:\left(\%\right)=\frac{{A}_{0}-{A}_{t}}{{A}_{0}}\times\:100$$
(1)

where Ao and At denote the AB113 concentrations at time 0 and t (s), respectively, with t being the duration of irradiation.

Catalyst characterization

The FESEM was utilized to analyze the surface morphology, dimensions, and shapes of the nanocomposites at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV (TESCAN MIRA3-XMU). Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) mapping characterized the elemental distribution of the fabricated samples. Moreover, X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were generated to analyze the phase and crystal structure of the specimens. The scans were conducted in the 2θ range from 10 to 80 using an X-ray diffractometer (Philips PW 1830 diffractometer) with Cu- Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å). To investigate the influence of N2 and/or CF4-plasma treatment on the as-prepared ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite, Raman Spectra have been recorded at room temperature using a spectrometer (Bruker-Senterra) which had a laser wavelength of 532 nm. The molecular vibrations of the samples were investigated using infrared spectra recorded with the support of KBr pellets in the wavelength range of 400–4000 cm−1 with an FTIR spectrometer (PerkinElmer 100). Moreover, by applying a BELSORP-mini II instrument, N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K were obtained. The specific surface area of the nanocomposites was determined using the BET method. Porosity parameters were obtained through the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. The UV-Vis reflectance spectra were measured employing a UV-2100 Shimadzu spectrophotometer. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) was done to measure the optical properties of light-absorbing nanoparticles in the UV–visible region.

Results and discussion

A schematic representation of the plasma treatment of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite powder using a low-pressure DBD reactor is illustrated in Fig. 1. Herein, the photocatalytic tests were performed for untreated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite, N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, respectively.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the non-thermal plasma treatment of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite powder by N2 and/or CF4-plasma via a low-pressure DBD reactor.

The XRD patterns for the ZnS and TiO2 nanoparticles, untreated ZnS/TiO2, and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 are given in Fig. 2(a). The spectrum of plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2nanocomposites shows weak and broad peaks around 30° and 48° corresponding to the (111) and the (220) of the ZnS phase, respectively49,52. The characteristic peaks representing N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites were observed at 2θ = 25.5°, 37.8°, 48.1°, 53.9°, 54.1°, 62.8° corresponding to the (101), (004), (200), (211), (204), (116) and (215) crystal planes of the anatase TiO2, respectively53. From the XRD patterns, it can be concluded that all the nanocomposites show high crystallinity suggesting that the structure remains unchanged upon N2 and CF4plasma treatments. The Debye-Scherrer equation, D = Kλ/βCosθ, is used to calculate the crystalline size of the nanoparticles, where D is the nanoparticles crystalline size, K represents the Scherrer constant (0.98), λ denotes the wavelength (1.54), and β denotes the full width at half maximum (FWHM)52,53. Hence, the average crystalline size calculated using the Debye-Scherrer equation for the untreated ZnS/TiO2 is about 41.12 nm, and for the N2 and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 are about 42.85 and 44.68 nm, respectively. The result showed an increase in the crystalline size by applying plasma, which was further investigated using FESEM analysis.

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) XRD patterns, (b) FTIR, and (c) Raman spectra of ZnS/TiO2, N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites.

The FTIR spectra of the produced ZnS and TiO2 nanoparticles, ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite, and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 can be observed in Fig. 2(b). The peaks appeared at 508 and 617 cm−1in the FTIR spectrum of ZnS are related to the Zn-S vibration54, and the broad peak observed at 750 –500 cm−1 in the spectrum of the TiO2is associated with the stretching vibrations of the Ti-O in anatase titania55. These peaks can also be seen in the FTIR spectra of both the untreated and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites. In the FTIR spectra of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites, the peak observed at 1100 cm−1 is the characteristic vibration peak of the ZnS. As can be seen, the intensity of this peak decreased in the spectrum of the CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2nanocomposite which may be related to plasma chemical etching of the catalyst surface56. This effect can lead to morphological changes on the catalyst surface, which was confirmed by subsequent characterization. The bands at 1635 –1615 cm−1 and the broad peaks about 3500 –3000 cm−1 correspond to the physisorbed water molecule that appears on the FTIR spectra of the untreated and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2nanocomposites52. It can be observed that the intensity of this peak declined in the spectrum of the CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, an effect than can be due to the cleavage of hydrogen bonds and adsorbed water evaporation55.

Figure 2(c) shows the Raman spectra of the prepared nanocatalysts. The peaks at 146, 194, 399, 514, and 640 cm−1 corresponded to the Eg, Eg, B1g, A1g, and Eg modes of anatase TiO2 and ZnS/TiO2, respectively57. According to the results, no significant change was observed in terms of band position for plasma-treated nanocomposites. However, the peak intensity decreased in the case of plasma-treated nanocomposites. Plasma treatment leads to the emergence of defects in the crystal structure of ZnS/TiO2by creating oxygen vacancies, which may lead to improved photocatalytic activity58. This defect reduces the peak intensity in the Raman spectra of the plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites.

The N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and BJH plots of the prepared photocatalysts have been given in Fig. 3(a) and (b), respectively. The untreated ZnS/TiO2 and N2-plasma-treated composite shows an type -IV curve, and the CF4-plasma-treated composite shows a type -V curve, with H3-type hysteresis loop in their isotherms. This indicates that the structure of all nanocomposites is mesoporous. However, there is a change in the adsorption behavior of the CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, which may be due to changes in the morphology of the catalyst. The V-type isotherm usually indicates the weak adsorbate-adsorbate interactions. The BET surface area of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite was about 128 m2 g−1, which was higher than that of the plasma-treated ones. The specific surface area of the N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite is about 73 m2 g−1. Besides, the specific surface area of CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite is about 15 m2 g−1. Compared with untreated ZnS/TiO2, the specific surface area of plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 decreased because the surface pores were filled by the plasma species generated by N2 and/or CF4electrical discharges59. Figure 3(b) shows the BJH plots, which present additional information about the pore distribution. The average pore size of the prepared nanocomposites was 10.8, 33.9, and 51.9 for ZnS /TiO2, N2-plasma-treated and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, respectively. The reasons for the increases in the pore sizes in plasma treated ZnS/TiO2is the hitting by high energy of charged particles generated by plasma60. The ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite showed a pore volume of 0.072 cm3 g–1, while the pore volume of N2-plasma and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 were 0.053 and 0.039 cm3 g−1respectively. In the field of photocatalysis, nanostructured pores can act as pathways for charge carriers to penetrate the interior, thereby reducing the recombination rates and improving the catalytic performance61. Therefore, the N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite would offer more sites accessible for the adsorption of the organic dye than CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2.

Figure 3
figure 3

(a) Adsorption–desorption isotherms, and (b) BJH plot of ZnS/TiO2, N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites.

The UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) absorption spectrum of the untreated ZnS/TiO2 and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites was recorded within the range of 200–700 nm, as shown in Fig. 4(a). It was observed that the nanocomposites have a wide UV absorption band in the range from 200 to 390 nm. The optical absorption edge was obtained from spectra by the intercept on the wavelength axis for a tangent drawn on absorption spectra.The band gap energy (Eg) of the untreated and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites can be calculated by the equation, αhv = A (hv-Eg)n/2, where α is the absorbance, h is Planck’s constant, v is the light frequency, A is a constant, Eg is the band gap energy and the value of n depends on the type of optical transition32. In this regard, we presented the Tauc plot (obtained from the UV-Vis DRS) in Fig. 4(b) showing the band gap energy of the untreated ZnS/TiO2 and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites. For untreated ZnS/TiO2, the optical band gap energy has been 3.65. While, the band gap energy of the N2-plasma-treated and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 was found to be 3.48 and 3.26 eV, respectively. This decrease in band gap energy can boost the photocatalytic performance of the plasma-treated nanocatalysts. The reduction in band gap after plasma treatment may be due to the production of defects in the crystal structure of ZnS/TiO2by creating oxygen vacancies62, as it has been confirmed by the Raman spectroscopy results. The anion and cation vacancies in the crystal structure created by plasma treatment, can attract photogenerated electrons, increase surface charge transfer, and diminish the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic performance63.

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) DRS, and (b) Tauc plot of ZnS/TiO2, N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites.

The FESEM images of untreated ZnS/TiO2 and plasma-treated nanocomposites are presented in Fig. 5. As can be seen in this image, the untreated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite contained relatively uniform particles with spherical shape and a size distribution of 31.2–80.0 nm (average size of 41.4 nm). However, after treatment with N2 and CF4 plasmas, it can be seen that the size of the nanoparticles increases. The size distribution of the plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 was found to be 31.2–250.0 nm, with an average size of 75.6 and 87.5 nm for N2 and CF4-plasma-treated composites. This increase in the particle size can be attributed to the increase in surface energy of the nanoparticles due to the collision of energetic ions by the plasma. In fact, the system tends to reduce energy by decreasing the surface to-volume ratio (as it was observed in the BET surface area results) through increasing the size of the nanoparticles64. It can also be seen that by plasma treatment, the surface of the catalyst was etched, an effect that is more intense in the case of CF4-plasma treatment. Etching introduces structural vacancies in the crystal structure and enhances charge carrier separation and light absorption, that improves the photocatalytic performance of the plasma-treated nanocomposites65.

Figure 5
figure 5

FESEM images of (a-c) ZnS/TiO2, (d-f) N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2. (g-i) CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites, at different magnifications.

To check the produced samples’ chemical composition of the produced samples, EDS analysis was done (see Fig. 6). The EDS results confirm the presence of Zn, Ti, S, and O elements in a hybrid nanocomposite structure. The lack of other elements in the analysis implies the extreme purity of the prepared nanocomposites. No notable changes were observed in the composition of the catalysts after plasma treatment, and the surface of the catalysts has been found to be a uniform mixture of both TiO2 and ZnS. The slight decrease in Ti and O content observed in N2 and CF4 plasma-treated nanocomposites could be due to their vacancies in the structure of plasma-treated photocatalysts.

Figure 6
figure 6

EDS analysis of (a) ZnS/TiO2, (b) N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and (c) CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites. The elemental mapping of (d-h) ZnS/TiO2, (i-m) N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and (n-r) CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites.

The photocatalytic performance of untreated ZnS/TiO2 and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites have been assessed by measuring the decomposition of AB113 dye solution as a model reaction under UV light irradiation at pH 7 (see Fig. 7). After 25 min of UV irradiation, the AB113 is almost degraded completely in the presence of N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite (about 95%). In contrast, it is degraded by 64% and 46% in the presence of CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 and untreated ZnS/TiO2, respectively. Although the specific surface area of ​​ZnS/TiO2 is higher than that of plasma-treated nanocomposites, the photocatalytic performance of N2-plasma-treated nanocatalyst is almost two times higher than untreated one. This is because of the creation of defects and vacancies in the crystal structure of the plasma-treated catalysts, which leads to a narrower bandgap and more noticeable light-absorbing ability in the UV light region. Moreover, the free electrons generated in plasma medium can enhance photocatalytic activity of the prepared nanocomposite by participating in reduction reactions, preventing electron-hole recombination, and increasing charge carrier density. The findings show that although the optical band gap energy of the CF4-plasma-treated catalyst is lower than the N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, its photocatalytic activity is lower. As mentioned earlier, N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite offers more accessible sites for organic dye adsorption than CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2.

Figure 7
figure 7

AB113 undergoes photodegradation when exposed to ZnS/TiO2, N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites under UV irradiation at pH 7.

Figure 8 shows the influence of different pH levels on the decomposition of AB113 in the presence of ZnS/TiO2, N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2nanocomposites. As can be seen in this figure, the highest dye removal happened at pH 7. When the pH is low, the production of hydroxyl radicals decreases because of the low concentration of OH64. Above the optimal pH value (pH = 7), the AB113 degradation decreased as a result of the repulsion between the negatively charged surface of the catalyst and hydroxide ions. Moreover, at elevated pH levels, the oxidizing radicals are scavanged and are not able to degrade the AB113 molecules66,67. It can be concluded that the increased photocatalytic efficiency of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites treated with plasma can be ascribed to the synergistic effect of some factors, which are described as follows. The plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites possess accessible pores, which provide abundant active sites for photocatalytic degradation of product reaction and assist mass exchange between AB113 molecules and photocatalytic degradation products across the ZnS/TiO2 surface. Besides, the excited atoms in plasma can change the physicochemical properties of the treated composition. The formation of various radicals in plasma-treated samples plays a significant role in the decomposition of AB113 on the ZnS/TiO2surface under UV-light exposure. Oxygen vacancies present on the surface of plasma-treated nanocomposites can serve as traps for electrons and holes67. These properties can raise the separation efficiency of photogenerated electron-hole pairs, thereby promoting efficient UV-light photocatalytic activity for AB113 degradation.

Figure 8
figure 8

The influence of different pH levels on the decomposition of AB113 when exposed to (a) ZnS/TiO2, (b) N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and (c) CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites under UV irradiation.

The schematic illustration of the photocatalytic performance of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite is drawn in Fig. 9. While the UV light is irradiated, it generates the photons needed to create electron-hole pairs. The results showed that the band gap energy of N2 and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 was 3.48 eV and 3.26 eV, respectively, which were lower than the untreated ZnS/TiO2 (3.65 eV). In the case of the N2 plasma, there are some molecular bands in plasma medium including the N2 first positive system (B3Πg) emission and N2 second positive system (C3Πu) produced by many excitations and quenching processes, the N+2 negative system (B2+u), and the atomic nitrogen generated by electron impact dissociation (N2+ e → 2 N + e)68,69,70. Besides, in the case of the CF4 plasma, CF4 molecules are dissociated into F, CF, CF2, and CF3radicals71,72,73. These radicals, especially free fluorine, are highly efficient for dry etching processes [ 73, 74]. The free fluorine can remarkably roughen the catalyst surface and generate distortions around the adsorption sites leading to production of cation and anion vacancies74,75,76. These vacancies produced during the plasma treatment can cause the band gap of the plasma-treated photocatalyst to be narrowed. In this regard, an electron from the conduction band (CB) of ZnS moved to the CB of TiO2, whereas, the hole transmission occurs from the valance band (VB) of TiO2 to the VB of ZnS. This band structure assists dissociation of the electron-hole pairs, so that electrons diminish molecular oxygen to generate superoxide radical anions (.O2), meanwhile, holes oxidize H2O to make hydroxyl radicals (.OH). Therefore, subsequently AB113 molecules are oxidized by these active species.

Figure 9
figure 9

Schematic representation of the photocatalytic mechanism of ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite (left image) after N2 and/or CF4-plasma treatment (right image).

Conclusions

In summary, the photocatalytic performance of untreated ZnS/TiO2 and plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite particles has been investigated in the presence of nitrogen and tetrafluoromethane plasma. The ZnS/TiO2 hybrid photocatalysts were fabricated through the hydrothermal method and modified by N2 and CF4 plasma using a low-pressure DBD reactor. The characteristics of the plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites have been analyzed by FTIR, XRD, Raman, FESEM, EDS, BET, BJH, and DRS analyses. The prepared nanocomposites were employed for the mineralization of AB113 in the presence of UV light. The plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites showed a higher photocatalytic efficiency than untreated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite. It was perceived that the N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite would offer more sites accessible for the adsorption of the organic dye than CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2. After 25 min of UV irradiation, the AB113 is almost completely degraded in the presence of N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposite (about 95%). In contrast, it was degraded by 64% and 46% in the presence of CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 and untreated ZnS/TiO2, respectively. The photocatalytic performance of N2-plasma-treated nanocatalysts is nearly two times higher than that of untreated ZnS/Ti O2. This is due to the creation of defects and vacancies in the crystal structure of the plasma-treated catalysts, which leads to a narrower bandgap and superior light-absorbing ability in the UV light region. The impact of various pH values on the photocatalytic degradation of AB113 was investigated in the presence of ZnS/TiO2, N2-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2, and CF4-plasma-treated ZnS/TiO2 nanocomposites. It was found that the highest dye removal happened at pH 7. This study showed an eco-friendly efficient approach to increase the photocatalytic performance of nanocomposites to degrade organic pollutants.