Table 3 Validation outcomes of the suggested algorithm compared to other approaches.
Function | PIOA56 | SDO57 | BOA58 | IEOSA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avg | Std | Avg | Std | Avg | Std | Avg | Std | |
F1 | 9.81 × 102 | 9.93 × 102 | 11.71 × 102 | 9.10 × 109 | 9.39 × 106 | 5.88 × 107 | 9.89 × 102 | 8.61 × 102 |
F3 | 8.36 × 102 | 5.57 × 10−1 | 7.69 × 104 | 5.95 × 104 | 6.69 × 103 | 3.52 × 103 | 7.51 × 102 | 5.23 × 102 |
F4 | 9.58 × 102 | 8.63 × 10 −1 | 12.82 × 102 | 6.93 × 102 | 8.55 × 102 | 8.13 × 101 | 6.25 × 102 | 4.95 |
F5 | 9.53 × 102 | 7.25 | 10.18 × 102 | 7.23 × 101 | 9.91 × 102 | 6.92 × 101 | 9.36 × 102 | 5.25 |
F6 | 10.22 × 102 | 8.23 × 10−14 | 10.34 × 102 | 5.77 × 101 | 10.61 × 102 | 5.59 × 101 | 10.45 × 102 | 5.39 × 10 −1 |
F7 | 11.57 × 102 | 9.19 × 102 | 12.32 × 102 | 6.93 × 101 | 11.84 × 102 | 6.59 × 101 | 11.16 × 102 | 8.83 |
F8 | 22.56 × 102 | 8.75 | 23.78 × 102 | 6.73 × 101 | 22.95 × 102 | 5.93 × 101 | 22.16 × 102 | 8.93 |
F9 | 36.00 × 102 | 6.95 | 5.93 × 103 | 11.03 × 102 | 4.87 × 103 | 8.18 × 102 | 22.43 × 102 | 6.93 |
F10 | 4.91 × 103 | 3.53 | 5.67 × 103 | 7.82 × 102 | 4.89 × 103 | 5.91 × 102 | 4.83 × 103 | 5.18 × 102 |
