Table 1 Summarizes patient demographics and surgical outcomes.

From: A novel sandwich technique of minimally invasive surgery for corneal perforation

Patients

Sex

Age

Aetiology of perforation

Size of perforation

Initial BCVA

Lenticels

Thickness, µm

AC

formation

Postop

BCVA

Associated

Findings

1

F

68

RA

3.2 × 3.5

0.1

120

AC formed

0.6

Severe dry eye

2

F

58

RA

3.5 × 3.5

0.02

120

AC formed

0.4

Iris prolapse

3

M

32

GVHD

3.0 × 3.1

0.2

120

AC formed

0.6

Severe dry eye

4

M

31

RA

3.0 × 2.8

0.3

120

AC formed

0.8

Iris prolapse

5

M

45

Trauma

2.8 × 2.8

0.6

120

AC formed

1.0

Iris prolapse

6

M

23

GVHD

2.6 × 2.8

0.3

120

AC formed

1.0

Severe dry eye

7

F

58

RA

3.5 × 3.6

0.1

120

AC formed

0.2

Iris prolapse

8

F

79

Viral keratitis

4.2 × 3.8

HM

120

AC formed

0.05

CNV

9

M

72

RA

3.0 × 2.8

0.01

120

AC formed

0.15

Severe dry eye

  1. M: Male, F: Female, BCVA: Best Corrected Visual Acuity, AC: Anterior chamber, HM: Hand Motion, PL: Perception of Light, CF: Counting Finggers, RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis, GVHD: Graft-versus-host Disease, CNV: Corneal Neovascularization.