Table 1 Results of the state-of-the-art methods. None of the comparison methods (the first seven rows) employ post-processing technique to optimize the segmentation results.

From: Transformer based 3D tooth segmentation via point cloud region partition

Method

Parameter

Inference

OAcc(%)

mIoU(%)

Size(M)

Time(ms)

Maxillary

Mandible

All

Maxillary

Mandible

All

PointNet32

3.531

50.960

60.091

68.005

64.423

27.512

49.737

40.055

PointNet++20

1.756

54.968

91.659

91.807

91.740

76.803

72.930

74.617

PointConv22

12.779

119.254

93.389

94.496

93.995

80.717

81.149

80.961

DGCNN50

1.462

141.980

94.905

96.108

95.564

85.346

89.939

87.938

PCT16

2.482

123.768

96.538

96.139

96.320

88.801

89.090

88.964

PVT14

2.690

127.880

94.718

94.523

94.612

84.292

85.883

85.190

PointMLP52

15.296

114.900

95.999

95.877

95.932

87.561

88.864

88.297

PointRegion w/o post-process

2.490

90.288

96.866

96.729

96.791

90.739

91.614

91.233

PointRegion with post-process

–

–

97.336

96.921

97.109

92.775

92.308

92.511

  1. Significant values are in bold.