Table 3 Statistics corresponding to Fig. 3. Fluorogold expression, Nav1.8, and TH colocalization were analyzed using ordinary two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons to perform genotype comparisons at each DRG. Significance was set at p < 0.05 for all datasets. All significant results are in bold.
From: Sensory neuron LKB1 mediates ovarian and reproductive function
Fig. | Dataset | Main effect | Multiple comparisons | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F (DFn, DFd) | p-value | Groups | p-value | ||
3e | Fluorogold (+) Neurons | DRG: F (4, 49) = 2.459 | p = 0.0576 | T10: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.9934 |
Genotype: F (2, 49) = 26.42 | p < 0.0001 | T10: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.2989 | ||
DRG x Genotype: F (8, 49) = 6.066 | p < 0.0001 | T10: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.3907 | ||
T11: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.4452 | ||||
T11: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.7962 | ||||
T11: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.1895 | ||||
T12: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.0910 | ||||
T12: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.0237 | ||||
T12: LKB1fl/flvs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p < 0.0001 | ||||
T13: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.0466 | ||||
T13: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.0004 | ||||
T13: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.2415 | ||||
L1: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p < 0.0001 | ||||
L1: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p < 0.0001 | ||||
L1: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.2516 | ||||
3f | Fluorogold & Nav1.8 (+) Neurons | DRG: F (4, 45) = 3.329 | p = 0.0180 | T10: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.6291 |
Genotype: F (2, 45) = 23.05 | p < 0.0001 | T10: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.3944 | ||
DRG x Genotype: F (8, 45) = 4.545 | p = 0.0004 | T10: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.0508 | ||
T11: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.3542 | ||||
T11: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.8798 | ||||
T11: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.1876 | ||||
T12: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.1493 | ||||
T12: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.2936 | ||||
T12: LKB1fl/flvs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.0062 | ||||
T13: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.2204 | ||||
T13: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.0003 | ||||
T13: LKB1fl/flvs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.0307 | ||||
L1: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.0003 | ||||
L1: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p < 0.0001 | ||||
L1: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.0790 | ||||
3 g | Fluorogold & tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (+) Neurons | DRG: F (4, 46) = 4.211 | p = 0.0055 | T10: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.3430 |
Genotype: F (2, 46) = 3.883 | p = 0.0277 | T10: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.4273 | ||
DRG x Genotype: F (8, 46) = 1.820 | p = 0.0975 | T10: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.9865 | ||
T11: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.4644 | ||||
T11: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.9754 | ||||
T11: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.6660 | ||||
T12: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.1008 | ||||
T12: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.0003 | ||||
T12: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.1141 | ||||
T13: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.9667 | ||||
T13: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.9136 | ||||
T13: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.9843 | ||||
L1: WT vs. LKB1fl/fl | p = 0.7610 | ||||
L1: WT vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.7491 | ||||
L1: LKB1fl/fl vs. Nav1.8LKB1 | p = 0.9971 | ||||